<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">aprp</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Актуальные проблемы российского права</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Actual Problems of Russian Law</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1994-1471</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2782-1862</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MSAL</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">aprp-1097</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИНТЕГРАЦИОННОЕ ПРАВО</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INTEGRATION LAW</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>К вопросу о реформе Cуда ЕС</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Question of the Reform of the European Union Court of Justice</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пономарева</surname><given-names>Д. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Ponomareva</surname><given-names>D. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">ponomard@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>07</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>180</fpage><lpage>185</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Пономарева Д.В., 2016</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Пономарева Д.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Ponomareva D.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://aprp.msal.ru/jour/article/view/1097">https://aprp.msal.ru/jour/article/view/1097</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье проводится анализ реформы Суда ЕС как попытки решения текущих проблем функционирования судебной системы Европейского Союза. Рассмотрены основные причины ее проведения, а также предпринята попытка проанализировать основные точки зрения представителей европейского судейского сообщества на указанную инициативу. Автором делается вывод о необходимости доработки проекта реформы в целях повышения эффективности работы судебного института.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper subjects the EU Court reforms to the analysis that reveals them as attempts to solve existing problems of functioning of the judicial system of the European Union. The paper considers the main reasons for putting the reform into practice, as well as the author makes an attempt to review the major opinions of the representatives of the European judicial community with regard to the initiative. The author concludes that it is necessary to refine the reform draft in order to enhance the effectiveness of the judicial institution.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Суд ЕС</kwd><kwd>реформа</kwd><kwd>Трибунал первой инстанции</kwd><kwd>специализированные суды</kwd><kwd>судебный институт</kwd><kwd>единообразие судебной практики</kwd><kwd>требование недискриминации</kwd><kwd>процедура назначения судей</kwd><kwd>судебная система ЕС</kwd><kwd>полномочия Суда ЕС</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>EU Court</kwd><kwd>reform</kwd><kwd>tribunal of first instance</kwd><kwd>specialized courts</kwd><kwd>judicial institution</kwd><kwd>uniformity of judicial practice</kwd><kwd>requirement of non-discrimination</kwd><kwd>procedure for appointing judges</kwd><kwd>judicial system of the EU</kwd><kwd>powers of the EU Court</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vataman Dan. The Court of Justice of the European Union after the reform established by the Lisbon Treaty. Bucharest: Universul Juridic Publishing House, 2011</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vataman Dan. The Court of Justice of the European Union after the reform established by the Lisbon Treaty. Bucharest: Universul Juridic Publishing House, 2011</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Право Европейского Союза: учебник для бакалавров: в 2 т. / С. Ю. Кашкин, А. О. Четвериков; под ред. С. Ю. Кашкина. 4-е изд. перераб. и доп. М.: Юрайт, 2013. Т. 1: Общая часть. С. 498</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Право Европейского Союза: учебник для бакалавров: в 2 т. / С. Ю. Кашкин, А. О. Четвериков; под ред. С. Ю. Кашкина. 4-е изд. перераб. и доп. М.: Юрайт, 2013. Т. 1: Общая часть. С. 498</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14448-2014-INIT/en/pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14448-2014-INIT/en/pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Европейский Союз: основополагающие акты в редакции Лиссабонского договора с комментариями / отв. ред. С. Ю. Кашкин. М.: Инфра-М, 2010. С. 119-151</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Европейский Союз: основополагающие акты в редакции Лиссабонского договора с комментариями / отв. ред. С. Ю. Кашкин. М.: Инфра-М, 2010. С. 119-151</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2015/06/23-questions-answers-general-court.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2015/06/23-questions-answers-general-court.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: http://www.rapsinews.ru/international_news/20150429/273642470.html.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: http://www.rapsinews.ru/international_news/20150429/273642470.html.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Response of the Court of Justice to the Presidency's invitation to present new proposals on the procedures for increasing the number of Judges at the General Court of the European Union // URL: http://data.consilium. europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14448-2014-INIT/en/pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Response of the Court of Justice to the Presidency's invitation to present new proposals on the procedures for increasing the number of Judges at the General Court of the European Union // URL: http://data.consilium. europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14448-2014-INIT/en/pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: http://data.consilium.europa.eu.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: http://data.consilium.europa.eu.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: https://euobserver.com/justice/128508.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: https://euobserver.com/justice/128508.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: https://euobserver.com/justice/128508.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: https://euobserver.com/justice/128508.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: http://www.rapsinews.ru/international_news/20150429/273642470.html.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: http://www.rapsinews.ru/international_news/20150429/273642470.html.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ECJ reform: Judges on verge of nervous breakdown // https://www.contexte.com/article/gouvernement.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ECJ reform: Judges on verge of nervous breakdown // https://www.contexte.com/article/gouvernement.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кашкин С.Ю. Введение в право Европейского Союза: учебник. - 3-е изд., перераб. и доп. / Кашкин С.Ю., Калиниченко П.А., Четвериков А.О. - М.: Эксмо, 2010. - С. 302-324.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Кашкин С.Ю. Введение в право Европейского Союза: учебник. - 3-е изд., перераб. и доп. / Кашкин С.Ю., Калиниченко П.А., Четвериков А.О. - М.: Эксмо, 2010. - С. 302-324.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Право Европейского Союза: учебник для бакалавров: в 2 т. / С.Ю. Кашкин, А.О. Четвериков; под ред. С.Ю. Кашкина. - 4-е изд., перераб. и доп. - М.: Юрайт, 2013. - Т. 1: Общая часть. - С. 468-515.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Право Европейского Союза: учебник для бакалавров: в 2 т. / С.Ю. Кашкин, А.О. Четвериков; под ред. С.Ю. Кашкина. - 4-е изд., перераб. и доп. - М.: Юрайт, 2013. - Т. 1: Общая часть. - С. 468-515.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Право Европейского Союза: учебник для бакалавров: в 2 т. / С.Ю. Кашкин, А.О. Четвериков; под ред. С.Ю. Кашкина. - 4-е изд., перераб. и доп. - М.: Юрайт, 2013. - Т. 2: Особенная часть. - C. 1023.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Право Европейского Союза: учебник для бакалавров: в 2 т. / С.Ю. Кашкин, А.О. Четвериков; под ред. С.Ю. Кашкина. - 4-е изд., перераб. и доп. - М.: Юрайт, 2013. - Т. 2: Особенная часть. - C. 1023.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Европейский Союз: основополагающие акты в редакции Лиссабонского договора с комментариями / отв. ред.С.Ю. Кашкин. - М.: Инфра-М, 2010. - С. 119-151.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Европейский Союз: основополагающие акты в редакции Лиссабонского договора с комментариями / отв. ред.С.Ю. Кашкин. - М.: Инфра-М, 2010. - С. 119-151.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vataman Dan. The Court of Justice of the European Union after the reform established by the Lisbon Treaty. - Bucharest: Universul Juridic Publishing House, 2011. - P. 2-8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vataman Dan. The Court of Justice of the European Union after the reform established by the Lisbon Treaty. - Bucharest: Universul Juridic Publishing House, 2011. - P. 2-8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: https://www.contexte.com/article/gouvernement</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: https://www.contexte.com/article/gouvernement</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
