aprpАктуальные проблемы российского праваActual Problems of Russian Law1994-14712782-1862MSAL10.17803/1994-1471.2019.99.2.170-175aprp-1169Research ArticleИНТЕГРАЦИОННОЕ ПРАВОINTEGRATION LAWПравовые аспекты разграничения компетенции институтов Европейского Союза в сфере антимонопольной политикиLegal aspects of competence delimitation of the European union institutions in the field of antitrust policyМитрофановИ. О.MitrofanovI. O.

Митрофанов Илья Олегович, аспирант кафедры интеграционного и европейского права.

125993, Россия, г. Москва, ул. Садовая-Кудринская, д. 9.

Mitrofanov Ilya Olegovich, Postgraduate of the Integration and European Law Department.

125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9.

mitrofanovil@gmail.comМосковского государственного юридического университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА).РоссияKutafin Moscow State University of Law (MSAL).Russian Federation20190102201902170175Copyright © Митрофанов И.О., 20192019Митрофанов И.О.Mitrofanov I.O.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://aprp.msal.ru/jour/article/view/1169

The paper provides an analysis of regulatory legal acts enshrining the powers of the institutions and bodies of the European Union, their interaction, as well as prospects for the further development of the mechanism for regulating the antitrust policy of the Union. According to the results of the study, the author concludes that the mechanism for regulating antimonopoly policy, established within the European Union, is adequately effective mainly due to the system of checks and balances, when no Union institution has exclusive power to make decisions. Despite this, the mechanism is developing, and it is developing along the path of decentralization. It appears that this should lead to the fact that compliance with Union antitrust laws will only increase.

антимонопольное правоЕвропейский СоюзинститутыСуд Европейского Союзаантимонопольная политикаантимонопольные органыЕвропейская конкурентная сетьantitrust lawEuropean UnioninstitutionsEuropean Court of Justiceantitrust policyantitrust authoritiesEuropean Competition NetworkReferencesКашкин С. Ю., Жупанов А. В. Тенденции развития антимонопольной политики ЕС и права конкуренции в рамках Европейского экономического пространства // Международно-правовые чтения. — 2013. — № 11. — С. 63—80.Kashkin S. Yu., Zhupanov A. V. Tendentsii razvitiya antimonopol’noy politiki ES i prava konkurentsii v ramkakh Evropeyskogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva // Mezhdunarodno-pravovye chteniya. — 2013. — № 11. — S. 63—80.Мещерякова О. М. Суд ЕС и запрет монополистической деятельности предприятий в праве ЕС // Правовая инициатива. — 2013. — № 1.Meshcheryakova O. M. Sud ES i zapret monopolisticheskoy deyatel’nosti predpriyatiy v prave ES // Pravovaya initsiativa. — 2013. — № 1.Hjelmtvedt K. The decentralization of enforcement of EU/EEA competition law // European Competition Law Abstract. — 2017. — № 38 (2). — Pp. 60—71.Hjelmtvedt K. The decentralization of enforcement of EU/EEA competition law // European Competition Law Abstract. — 2017. — № 38 (2). — Pp. 60—71.Jalabert-Doury N., Leclerc E., Blutel J. M., Schrepel T. Competition policies // International Business Law Journal. — 2016. — № 4. — Pp. 449—462.Jalabert-Doury N., Leclerc E., Blutel J. M., Schrepel T. Competition policies // International Business Law Journal. — 2016. — № 4. — Pp. 449—462.Mircea V., Matei E. The second decentralisation of competition law — a must for an orderly administration of justice in the EU // Global Competition Litigation Abstract. — 2014. — № 7 (4). — Pp. 195—199.Mircea V., Matei E. The second decentralisation of competition law — a must for an orderly administration of justice in the EU // Global Competition Litigation Abstract. — 2014. — № 7 (4). — Pp. 195—199.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.