aprpАктуальные проблемы российского праваActual Problems of Russian Law1994-14712782-1862MSAL10.17803/1994-1471.2020.118.9.019-031aprp-2272Research ArticleГОСУДАРСТВЕННАЯ ВЛАСТЬ И МЕСТНОЕ САМОУПРАВЛЕНИЕSTATE POWER AND LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENTБольшие данные в законодательном процессеBig Data in the Legislative ProcessЗенинС. С.ZeninS. S.

Зенин Сергей Сергеевич, кандидат юридических наук, доцент, директор НИИ

Садовая-Кудринская ул., д. 9, г. Москва, Россия, 125993

Sergey S. Zenin, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Head

ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, Russia, 125993

zeninsergei@mail.ruКутейниковД. Л.KuteynikovD. L.

Кутейников Дмитрий Леонидович, кандидат юридических наук, старший преподаватель кафедры конституционного и муниципального права

Садовая-Кудринская ул., д. 9, г. Москва, Россия, 125993

Dmitriy L. Kuteynikov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Senior Lecturer, Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law

ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, Russia, 125993

kuteynikov@me.comЯпрынцевИ. М.YapryntsevI. M.

Япрынцев Иван Михайлович, кандидат юридических наук, советник судьи

Сенатская пл., д. 1, г. Санкт-Петербург, Россия, 190000

Ivan M. Yapryntsev, Cand. Sci. (Law), Advisor to the Judge

pl. Senatskaya, d. 1, St. Petersburg, Russia, 190000

imihyapryncev@msal.ruМосковский государственного юридического университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)Kutafin University Research Institute (MSAL)Конституционный Суд РФConstitutional Court of the Russian Federation2020110820201591931Copyright © Зенин С.С., Кутейников Д.Л., Япрынцев И.М., 20202020Зенин С.С., Кутейников Д.Л., Япрынцев И.М.Zenin S.S., Kuteynikov D.L., Yapryntsev I.M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://aprp.msal.ru/jour/article/view/2272

В статье представлены возможные направления использования технологии больших данных в рамках законодательной деятельности. Обозначены сущностные характеристики технологии больших данных, которые выступают предпосылкой ее внедрения в сферу публичного управления. Авторами описаны существующие практики имплементации этой технологии в сфере юриспруденции. С учетом отлаженных процессов использования больших данных в рамках частного сектора авторами оценены перспективы использования этого опыта в процессе разработки нормативных правовых актов, в том числе в корреляции с конкретными стадиями законодательного процесса. Особое внимание уделяется анализу индивидуализированного регулирования и гранулярных норм, а также основаниям и особенностям использования ми- кродиректив как результата использования больших данных при формировании норм права. В заключении авторы приводят ряд проблемных аспектов (проблема правовой определенности, обеспечение принципа равенства), которые обостряются в связи с использованием технологии больших данных в законодательной деятельности, а также обосновывают ряд дополнительных требований, способствующих минимизации приведенных угроз.

The paper elucidates possible directions of the use of the big data technology in the framework of legislative activities. The authors determine essential characteristics of the big data technology, which act as a prerequisite for its implementation in the field of public administration. The authors describe the existing practices of implementation of this technology in the field of jurisprudence. Taking into account the well-established processes of using big data in the private sector, the authors evaluate the prospects of using this experience in the process of developing regulatory legal acts, including their correlation with specific stages of the legislative process. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of individualized regulation and granular norms, as well as to the grounds and features of the use of microdirectives as a result of the use of big data in rules of law formation. In conclusion, the authors enumerate a number of problematic aspects (the problem of legal certainty, ensuring the principle of equality), which are exacerbated by the use of the big data technology in legislative activities, and substantiate application of a number of additional requirements that help to minimize these threats.

законодательный процессбольшие данныебаза данныхгранулярные нормыперсонифицированное правовое регулированиемикродирективыlegislative processbig datadatabasegranular normspersonalized legal regulationmicrodirectivesИсследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного проекта № 18-29-16214The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 18-29-16214ReferencesAlpaydin E. Introduction to Machine Learning. 3rd ed. / Ethem Alpaydin. — Cambridge : The MIT Press, 2014.Alpaydin E. Introduction to Machine Learning. 3rd ed. / Ethem Alpaydin. — Cambridge : The MIT Press, 2014.Ben-Shahar О. and Porat А. Personalizing Negligence Law // New York University Law review. — 2016. — Vol. 3. — No. 3.Ben-Shahar O. and Porat A. Personalizing Negligence Law // New York University Law review. — 2016. — Vol. 3. — No. 3.Big data, artificial intelligence, machine learning and data protection. The United Kingdom Information Commissioner’s Office. — March. 2017.Big data, artificial intelligence, machine learning and data protection. The United Kingdom Information Commissioner’s Office. — March. 2017.Busch C. and De Franceschi A. Granular Legal Norms: Big Data and the Personalization of Private Law // Research Handbook on Data Science and Law / V. Mak, E. Tjong Tjin Tai and A. Berlee (eds). — Edward Elgar, 2018.Busch C. and De Franceschi A. Granular Legal Norms: Big Data and the Personalization of Private Law // Research Handbook on Data Science and Law / V. Mak, E. Tjong Tjin Tai and A. Berlee (eds). — Edward Elgar, 2018.Busch C. Implementing Personalized Law: Personalized Disclosures in Consumer Law and Data Privacy Law // The University of Chicago Law Abstract. — 86:309.2019. — Pp. 309—331.Busch C. Implementing Personalized Law: Personalized Disclosures in Consumer Law and Data Privacy Law // The University of Chicago Law Abstract. — 86:309.2019. — Pp. 309—331.Busch C. The Future of Pre-contractual Information Duties: From Behavioural Insights to Big Data // Research Handbook on EU Consumer and Contract Law / Ch. Twigg-Flesner (ed.). — Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016.Busch C. The Future of Pre-contractual Information Duties: From Behavioural Insights to Big Data // Research Handbook on EU Consumer and Contract Law / Ch. Twigg-Flesner (ed.). — Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016.Byers A. Big Data, Big Economic Impact // I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society. — 2015. — Vol. 10. — No. 3. — Pp. 757—764.Byers A. Big Data, Big Economic Impact // I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society. — 2015. — Vol. 10. — No. 3. — Pp. 757—764.Citron D., Pasquale F. The scored society: due process for automated predictions // Washington Law Abstract. — 2014. — No. 89. — Pp. 14—15.Citron D., Pasquale F. The scored society: due process for automated predictions // Washington Law Abstract. — 2014. — No. 89. — Pp. 14—15.Dale R. Law and Word Order: NLP in Legal Tech // Natural Language Engineering. — 2019. — 25 (1). — Pp. 211—212.Dale R. Law and Word Order: NLP in Legal Tech // Natural Language Engineering. — 2019. — 25 (1). — Pp. 211—212.Francart T., Dann J., Pappalardo R., Malagon C., Pellegrino M. The European Legislation Identifier // Knowledge of the Law in the Big Data Age. — 2019. — Vol. 317. — Pp. 137—148.Dale R. Law and Word Order: NLP in Legal Tech // Natural Language Engineering. — 2019. — 25 (1). — Pp. 211—212.Francesconi Е. Reasoning with Deontic Notions in a Decidable Framework // Knowledge of the Law in the Big Data Age. — 2019. — Vol. 317. — Pp. 63—81.Francart T., Dann J., Pappalardo R., Malagon C., Pellegrino M. The European Legislation Identifier // Knowledge of the Law in the Big Data Age. — 2019. — Vol. 317. — Pp. 137—148.Gardner S. Artificial Intelligence Poses Data Privacy Challenges // Bloomberg Law Privacy and Data Security. — 2016.Francart T., Dann J., Pappalardo R., Malagon C., Pellegrino M. The European Legislation Identifier // Knowledge of the Law in the Big Data Age. — 2019. — Vol. 317. — Pp. 137—148.Hacker P. Personalizing EU Private Law: From Disclosures to Nudges and Mandates // 25 European Review of Private Law 651. 2017.Francesconi E. Reasoning with Deontic Notions in a Decidable Framework // Knowledge of the Law in the Big Data Age. — 2019. — Vol. 317. — Pp. 63—81.Laney D. 3-D Data Management: Controlling Data Volume, Velocity and Variety // Application Delivery Strategies. — META Group. — February 6, 2001. — URL: https://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/files/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-Data-Volume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf (дата обращения: 07.05.2020).Francesconi E. Reasoning with Deontic Notions in a Decidable Framework // Knowledge of the Law in the Big Data Age. — 2019. — Vol. 317. — Pp. 63—81.Lenz R. Big Data: Ethics and Law // SSRN Electronic Journal. — 2019.Gardner S. Artificial Intelligence Poses Data Privacy Challenges // Bloomberg Law Privacy and Data Security. — 2016.Lerman J. Big Data and Its Exclusions // Stanford Law Abstract. — 2013. — Vol. 66.Gardner S. Artificial Intelligence Poses Data Privacy Challenges // Bloomberg Law Privacy and Data Security. — 2016.Mark A. Cohen. Why Is Law So Slow To Use Data? // URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/markcohen1/2019/06/24/why-is-law-so-slow-to-use-data/#14ffc709b8eb.Hacker P. Personalizing EU Private Law: From Disclosures to Nudges and Mandates // 25 European Review of Private Law 651. 2017.Medvedeva M., Vols M. & Wieling M. Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights // URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10506-019-09255-y#citeas.Hacker P. Personalizing EU Private Law: From Disclosures to Nudges and Mandates // 25 European Review of Private Law 651. 2017.Online «Legislative Explorer» uses big data to track decades of lawmaking // URL: https://www.washington.edu/news/2014/04/25/online-legislative-explorer-uses-big-data-to-track-decades-of-lawmaking/.Laney D. 3-D Data Management: Controlling Data Volume, Velocity and Variety // Application Delivery Strategies. — META Group. — February 6, 2001. — URL: https://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/files/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-Data-Volume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 07.05.2020).Porat A., Strahilevitz J. Personalizing Default Rules and Disclosure with Big Data // Michigan Law Abstract. — 2014. — Vol. 112. — Iss. 8. — 1417—1478.Laney D. 3-D Data Management: Controlling Data Volume, Velocity and Variety // Application Delivery Strategies. — META Group. — February 6, 2001. — URL: https://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/files/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-Data-Volume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 07.05.2020).Scheirer W. J., Jain L. P., Boult T. E. Probability Models for Open Set Recognition // IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (T-PAMI). — 2014. — № 11 (36).Lenz R. Big Data: Ethics and Law // SSRN Electronic Journal. — 2019.Sharyn O’Halloran S., Sameer Maskey S., Geraldine McAllister G., Park D. K., Chen K. Data Science and Political Economy: Application to Financial Regulatory Structure // The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences. — 2016. — Vol. 2. — No. 7.Lenz R. Big Data: Ethics and Law // SSRN Electronic Journal. — 2019.Using NLP and ML to Analyze Legislative Burdens Upon Businesses // URL: https://medium.com/@ODSC/using-nlp-and-ml-to-analyze-legislative-burdens-upon-businesses-e5cc106b85b0.Lerman J. Big Data and Its Exclusions // Stanford Law Abstract. — 2013. — Vol. 66.van der Sloot B., van Schendel S. International and comparative legal study on Big Data // wrr. The Hague 2016.Lerman J. Big Data and Its Exclusions // Stanford Law Abstract. — 2013. — Vol. 66.Williams B. A., Brooks C. F. and Shmargad Y. How Algorithms Discriminate Based on Data They Lack: Challenges, Solutions, and Policy Implications // Journal of Information Policy. — 2018. — Vol. 8.Lerman J. Big Data and Its Exclusions // Stanford Law Abstract. — 2013. — Vol. 66.Ződi Z. Law and Legal Science in the Age of Big Data // Human Rights and EU Conditionality in the Western Balkans. — 2017. — Vol. 3. — No. 2.Mark A. Cohen. Why Is Law So Slow To Use Data? // URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/markcohen1/2019/06/24/why-is-law-so-slow-to-use-data/#14ffc709b8eb.Дэви С., Арно М., Мухамед А. Основы data science и Big Data/Python и наука о данных. — СПб. : Питер, 2017.Mark A. Cohen. Why Is Law So Slow To Use Data? // URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/markcohen1/2019/06/24/why-is-law-so-slow-to-use-data/#14ffc709b8eb.Ермакова Е. П. Ситкарева Е. В. Стратегия электронного правосудия в Европейском Союзе: правосудие в сети Интернет // Юстиция. — 2014. — № 1.Mark A. Cohen. Why Is Law So Slow To Use Data? // URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/markcohen1/2019/06/24/why-is-law-so-slow-to-use-data/#14ffc709b8eb.Крусс В. И. Конституционный федерализм и состоятельность субфедерального законотворчества // Государственная власть и местное самоуправление. — 2019. — № 12.Medvedeva M., Vols M. & Wieling M. Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights // URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10506-019-09255-y#citeas.Куракин А. В., Карпухин Д. В., Попова Н. Ф. Принципы разграничения предметов ве́дения и полномочий между органами государственной власти Российской Федерации и ее субъектами // Административное и муниципальное право. — 2018. — № 11.Medvedeva M., Vols M. & Wieling M. Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights // URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10506-019-09255-y#citeas.Савельев А. И. Проблемы применения законодательства о персональных данных в эпоху «больших данных» (Big Data) // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. — 2015. — № 1.Medvedeva M., Vols M. & Wieling M. Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights // URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10506-019-09255-y#citeas.Федосеев С. В. Применение современных технологий больших данных в правовой сфере // Правовая информатика. — 2018. — № 4.Online «Legislative Explorer» uses big data to track decades of lawmaking // URL: https://www.washington.edu/news/2014/04/25/online-legislative-explorer-uses-big-data-to-track-decades-of-lawmaking/.Online «Legislative Explorer» uses big data to track decades of lawmaking // URL: https://www.washington.edu/news/2014/04/25/online-legislative-explorer-uses-big-data-to-track-decades-of-lawmaking/.Online «Legislative Explorer» uses big data to track decades of lawmaking // URL: https://www.washington.edu/news/2014/04/25/online-legislative-explorer-uses-big-data-to-track-decades-of-lawmaking/.Online «Legislative Explorer» uses big data to track decades of lawmaking // URL: https://www.washington.edu/news/2014/04/25/online-legislative-explorer-uses-big-data-to-track-decades-of-lawmaking/.Online «Legislative Explorer» uses big data to track decades of lawmaking // URL: https://www.washington.edu/news/2014/04/25/online-legislative-explorer-uses-big-data-to-track-decades-of-lawmaking/.Porat A., Strahilevitz J. Personalizing Default Rules and Disclosure with Big Data // Michigan Law Abstract. — 2014. — Vol. 112. — Iss. 8. — 1417—1478.Porat A., Strahilevitz J. Personalizing Default Rules and Disclosure with Big Data // Michigan Law Abstract. — 2014. — Vol. 112. — Iss. 8. — 1417—1478.Porat A., Strahilevitz J. Personalizing Default Rules and Disclosure with Big Data // Michigan Law Abstract. — 2014. — Vol. 112. — Iss. 8. — 1417—1478.Porat A., Strahilevitz J. Personalizing Default Rules and Disclosure with Big Data // Michigan Law Abstract. — 2014. — Vol. 112. — Iss. 8. — 1417—1478.Porat A., Strahilevitz J. Personalizing Default Rules and Disclosure with Big Data // Michigan Law Abstract. — 2014. — Vol. 112. — Iss. 8. — 1417—1478.Porat A., Strahilevitz J. Personalizing Default Rules and Disclosure with Big Data // Michigan Law Abstract. — 2014. — Vol. 112. — Iss. 8. — 1417—1478.Scheirer W. J., Jain L. P., Boult T. E. Probability Models for Open Set Recognition // IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (T-PAMI). — 2014. — № 11 (36).Scheirer W. J., Jain L. P., Boult T. E. Probability Models for Open Set Recognition // IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (T-PAMI). — 2014. — № 11 (36).Scheirer W. J., Jain L. P., Boult T. E. Probability Models for Open Set Recognition // IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (T-PAMI). — 2014. — № 11 (36).Scheirer W. J., Jain L. P., Boult T. E. Probability Models for Open Set Recognition // IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (T-PAMI). — 2014. — № 11 (36).Scheirer W. J., Jain L. P., Boult T. E. Probability Models for Open Set Recognition // IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (T-PAMI). — 2014. — № 11 (36).Scheirer W. J., Jain L. P., Boult T. E. Probability Models for Open Set Recognition // IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (T-PAMI). — 2014. — № 11 (36).Sharyn O’Halloran S., Sameer Maskey S., Geraldine McAllister G., Park D. K., Chen K. Data Science and Political Economy: Application to Financial Regulatory Structure // The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences. — 2016. — Vol. 2. — No. 7.Sharyn O’Halloran S., Sameer Maskey S., Geraldine McAllister G., Park D. K., Chen K. Data Science and Political Economy: Application to Financial Regulatory Structure // The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences. — 2016. — Vol. 2. — No. 7.Sharyn O’Halloran S., Sameer Maskey S., Geraldine McAllister G., Park D. K., Chen K. Data Science and Political Economy: Application to Financial Regulatory Structure // The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences. — 2016. — Vol. 2. — No. 7.Sharyn O’Halloran S., Sameer Maskey S., Geraldine McAllister G., Park D. K., Chen K. Data Science and Political Economy: Application to Financial Regulatory Structure // The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences. — 2016. — Vol. 2. — No. 7.Sharyn O’Halloran S., Sameer Maskey S., Geraldine McAllister G., Park D. K., Chen K. Data Science and Political Economy: Application to Financial Regulatory Structure // The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences. — 2016. — Vol. 2. — No. 7.Sharyn O’Halloran S., Sameer Maskey S., Geraldine McAllister G., Park D. K., Chen K. Data Science and Political Economy: Application to Financial Regulatory Structure // The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences. — 2016. — Vol. 2. — No. 7.Using NLP and ML to Analyze Legislative Burdens Upon Businesses // URL: https://medium.com/@ODSC/using-nlp-and-ml-to-analyze-legislative-burdens-upon-businesses-e5cc106b85b0.Using NLP and ML to Analyze Legislative Burdens Upon Businesses // URL: https://medium.com/@ODSC/using-nlp-and-ml-to-analyze-legislative-burdens-upon-businesses-e5cc106b85b0.Using NLP and ML to Analyze Legislative Burdens Upon Businesses // URL: https://medium.com/@ODSC/using-nlp-and-ml-to-analyze-legislative-burdens-upon-businesses-e5cc106b85b0.Using NLP and ML to Analyze Legislative Burdens Upon Businesses // URL: https://medium.com/@ODSC/using-nlp-and-ml-to-analyze-legislative-burdens-upon-businesses-e5cc106b85b0.Using NLP and ML to Analyze Legislative Burdens Upon Businesses // URL: https://medium.com/@ODSC/using-nlp-and-ml-to-analyze-legislative-burdens-upon-businesses-e5cc106b85b0.Using NLP and ML to Analyze Legislative Burdens Upon Businesses // URL: https://medium.com/@ODSC/using-nlp-and-ml-to-analyze-legislative-burdens-upon-businesses-e5cc106b85b0.van der Sloot B., van Schendel S. International and comparative legal study on Big Data // wrr. The Hague 2016.van der Sloot B., van Schendel S. International and comparative legal study on Big Data // wrr. The Hague 2016.van der Sloot B., van Schendel S. International and comparative legal study on Big Data // wrr. The Hague 2016.van der Sloot B., van Schendel S. International and comparative legal study on Big Data // wrr. The Hague 2016.van der Sloot B., van Schendel S. International and comparative legal study on Big Data // wrr. The Hague 2016.van der Sloot B., van Schendel S. International and comparative legal study on Big Data // wrr. The Hague 2016.Williams B. A., Brooks C. F. and Shmargad Y. How Algorithms Discriminate Based on Data They Lack: Challenges, Solutions, and Policy Implications // Journal of Information Policy. — 2018. — Vol. 8.Williams B. A., Brooks C. F. and Shmargad Y. How Algorithms Discriminate Based on Data They Lack: Challenges, Solutions, and Policy Implications // Journal of Information Policy. — 2018. — Vol. 8.Williams B. A., Brooks C. F. and Shmargad Y. How Algorithms Discriminate Based on Data They Lack: Challenges, Solutions, and Policy Implications // Journal of Information Policy. — 2018. — Vol. 8.Williams B. A., Brooks C. F. and Shmargad Y. How Algorithms Discriminate Based on Data They Lack: Challenges, Solutions, and Policy Implications // Journal of Information Policy. — 2018. — Vol. 8.Williams B. A., Brooks C. F. and Shmargad Y. How Algorithms Discriminate Based on Data They Lack: Challenges, Solutions, and Policy Implications // Journal of Information Policy. — 2018. — Vol. 8.Williams B. A., Brooks C. F. and Shmargad Y. How Algorithms Discriminate Based on Data They Lack: Challenges, Solutions, and Policy Implications // Journal of Information Policy. — 2018. — Vol. 8.Ződi Z. Law and Legal Science in the Age of Big Data // Human Rights and EU Conditionality in the Western Balkans. — 2017. — Vol. 3. — No. 2.Ződi Z. Law and Legal Science in the Age of Big Data // Human Rights and EU Conditionality in the Western Balkans. — 2017. — Vol. 3. — No. 2.Ződi Z. Law and Legal Science in the Age of Big Data // Human Rights and EU Conditionality in the Western Balkans. — 2017. — Vol. 3. — No. 2.Ződi Z. Law and Legal Science in the Age of Big Data // Human Rights and EU Conditionality in the Western Balkans. — 2017. — Vol. 3. — No. 2.Ződi Z. Law and Legal Science in the Age of Big Data // Human Rights and EU Conditionality in the Western Balkans. — 2017. — Vol. 3. — No. 2.Ződi Z. Law and Legal Science in the Age of Big Data // Human Rights and EU Conditionality in the Western Balkans. — 2017. — Vol. 3. — No. 2.Devi S., Arno M., Muhamed A. Osnovy data science i Big Data/Python i nauka o dannyh. — SPb. : Piter, 2017.Devi S., Arno M., Muhamed A. Osnovy data science i Big Data/Python i nauka o dannyh. — SPb. : Piter, 2017.Devi S., Arno M., Muhamed A. Osnovy data science i Big Data/Python i nauka o dannyh. — SPb. : Piter, 2017.Devi S., Arno M., Muhamed A. Osnovy data science i Big Data/Python i nauka o dannyh. — SPb. : Piter, 2017.Devi S., Arno M., Muhamed A. Osnovy data science i Big Data/Python i nauka o dannyh. — SPb. : Piter, 2017.Devi S., Arno M., Muhamed A. Osnovy data science i Big Data/Python i nauka o dannyh. — SPb. : Piter, 2017.Ermakova E. P. Sitkareva E. V. Strategiya elektronnogo pravosudiya v Evropejskom Soyuze: pravosudie v seti Internet // Yusticiya. — 2014. — № 1.Ermakova E. P. Sitkareva E. V. Strategiya elektronnogo pravosudiya v Evropejskom Soyuze: pravosudie v seti Internet // Yusticiya. — 2014. — № 1.Ermakova E. P. Sitkareva E. V. Strategiya elektronnogo pravosudiya v Evropejskom Soyuze: pravosudie v seti Internet // Yusticiya. — 2014. — № 1.Ermakova E. P. Sitkareva E. V. Strategiya elektronnogo pravosudiya v Evropejskom Soyuze: pravosudie v seti Internet // Yusticiya. — 2014. — № 1.Ermakova E. P. Sitkareva E. V. Strategiya elektronnogo pravosudiya v Evropejskom Soyuze: pravosudie v seti Internet // Yusticiya. — 2014. — № 1.Ermakova E. P. Sitkareva E. V. Strategiya elektronnogo pravosudiya v Evropejskom Soyuze: pravosudie v seti Internet // Yusticiya. — 2014. — № 1.Kruss V. I. Konstitucionnyj federalizm i sostoyatel’nost’ subfederal’nogo zakonotvorchestva // Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2019. — № 12.Kruss V. I. Konstitucionnyj federalizm i sostoyatel’nost’ subfederal’nogo zakonotvorchestva // Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2019. — № 12.Kruss V. I. Konstitucionnyj federalizm i sostoyatel’nost’ subfederal’nogo zakonotvorchestva // Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2019. — № 12.Kruss V. I. Konstitucionnyj federalizm i sostoyatel’nost’ subfederal’nogo zakonotvorchestva // Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2019. — № 12.Kruss V. I. Konstitucionnyj federalizm i sostoyatel’nost’ subfederal’nogo zakonotvorchestva // Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2019. — № 12.Kruss V. I. Konstitucionnyj federalizm i sostoyatel’nost’ subfederal’nogo zakonotvorchestva // Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2019. — № 12.Kurakin A. V., Karpuhin D. V., Popova N. F. Principy razgranicheniya predmetov védeniya i polnomochij mezhdu organami gosudarstvennoj vlasti Rossijskoj Federacii i ee sub"ektami // Administrativnoe i municipal’noe pravo. — 2018. — № 11.Kurakin A. V., Karpuhin D. V., Popova N. F. Principy razgranicheniya predmetov védeniya i polnomochij mezhdu organami gosudarstvennoj vlasti Rossijskoj Federacii i ee sub"ektami // Administrativnoe i municipal’noe pravo. — 2018. — № 11.Kurakin A. V., Karpuhin D. V., Popova N. F. Principy razgranicheniya predmetov védeniya i polnomochij mezhdu organami gosudarstvennoj vlasti Rossijskoj Federacii i ee sub"ektami // Administrativnoe i municipal’noe pravo. — 2018. — № 11.Kurakin A. V., Karpuhin D. V., Popova N. F. Principy razgranicheniya predmetov védeniya i polnomochij mezhdu organami gosudarstvennoj vlasti Rossijskoj Federacii i ee sub"ektami // Administrativnoe i municipal’noe pravo. — 2018. — № 11.Kurakin A. V., Karpuhin D. V., Popova N. F. Principy razgranicheniya predmetov védeniya i polnomochij mezhdu organami gosudarstvennoj vlasti Rossijskoj Federacii i ee sub"ektami // Administrativnoe i municipal’noe pravo. — 2018. — № 11.Kurakin A. V., Karpuhin D. V., Popova N. F. Principy razgranicheniya predmetov védeniya i polnomochij mezhdu organami gosudarstvennoj vlasti Rossijskoj Federacii i ee sub"ektami // Administrativnoe i municipal’noe pravo. — 2018. — № 11.Savel’ev A. I. Problemy primeneniya zakonodatel’stva o personal’nyh dannyh v epohu «bol’shih dannyh» (Big Data) // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. — 2015. — № 1.Savel’ev A. I. Problemy primeneniya zakonodatel’stva o personal’nyh dannyh v epohu «bol’shih dannyh» (Big Data) // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. — 2015. — № 1.Savel’ev A. I. Problemy primeneniya zakonodatel’stva o personal’nyh dannyh v epohu «bol’shih dannyh» (Big Data) // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. — 2015. — № 1.Savel’ev A. I. Problemy primeneniya zakonodatel’stva o personal’nyh dannyh v epohu «bol’shih dannyh» (Big Data) // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. — 2015. — № 1.Savel’ev A. I. Problemy primeneniya zakonodatel’stva o personal’nyh dannyh v epohu «bol’shih dannyh» (Big Data) // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. — 2015. — № 1.Savel’ev A. I. Problemy primeneniya zakonodatel’stva o personal’nyh dannyh v epohu «bol’shih dannyh» (Big Data) // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. — 2015. — № 1.Fedoseev S. V. Primenenie sovremennyh tekhnologij bol’shih dannyh v pravovoj sfere // Pravovaya informatika. — 2018. — № 4.Fedoseev S. V. Primenenie sovremennyh tekhnologij bol’shih dannyh v pravovoj sfere // Pravovaya informatika. — 2018. — № 4.Fedoseev S. V. Primenenie sovremennyh tekhnologij bol’shih dannyh v pravovoj sfere // Pravovaya informatika. — 2018. — № 4.Fedoseev S. V. Primenenie sovremennyh tekhnologij bol’shih dannyh v pravovoj sfere // Pravovaya informatika. — 2018. — № 4.Fedoseev S. V. Primenenie sovremennyh tekhnologij bol’shih dannyh v pravovoj sfere // Pravovaya informatika. — 2018. — № 4.Fedoseev S. V. Primenenie sovremennyh tekhnologij bol’shih dannyh v pravovoj sfere // Pravovaya informatika. — 2018. — № 4.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.