<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">aprp</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Актуальные проблемы российского права</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Actual Problems of Russian Law</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1994-1471</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2782-1862</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MSAL</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17803/1994-1471.2024.168.11.147-158</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">aprp-4931</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕЖДУНАРОДНОЕ ПРАВО</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INTERNATIONAL LAW</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Механизмы разрешения споров в региональных торговых соглашениях: прошлое, настоящее и будущее</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Regional Trade Agreements: Past, Present and Future</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Волкова</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Volkova</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Волкова Алина Александровна, аспирант кафедры международного права юридического факультета</p><p>Ленинские горы, д. 1, стр. 13 (4‑й учеб. корпус), г. Москва, 119991</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Alina A. Volkova, Postgraduate Student, Department of International Law, Faculty of Law</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">alina.markina1997@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный университет имени М. В. Ломоносова</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>08</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>19</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>147</fpage><lpage>158</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Волкова А.А., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Волкова А.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Volkova A.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://aprp.msal.ru/jour/article/view/4931">https://aprp.msal.ru/jour/article/view/4931</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье анализируются различные виды предусмотренных региональными торговыми соглашениями механизмов разрешения межгосударственных споров и приводится их типология. Отмечается, что в современных региональных торговых соглашениях наблюдается эволюция в сторону использования независимых судебных или арбитражных механизмов, в рамках которых выносятся обязательные решения по спорам, причем с заметным отрывом лидируют варианты передачи споров на рассмотрение арбитражных трибуналов ad hoc. Однако на практике распространение региональных торговых соглашений не привело к увеличению числа торговых споров, рассматриваемых в рамках соответствующих региональных механизмов. Абсолютное большинство таких механизмов остаются незадействованными из-за того, что государства - участники таких соглашений по-прежнему предпочитают рассматривать споры между собой на уровне Всемирной торговой организации, несмотря на прекращение деятельности Апелляционного органа ВТО. Региональные механизмы используются в первую очередь для разрешения споров, которые касаются вопросов, выходящих за рамки ВТО (например, соблюдение трудовых стандартов, охраны труда и окружающей среды).</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper examines various types of mechanisms for resolving interstate disputes provided for by regional trade agreements and provides a typology of them. It is noted that modern regional trade agreements are evolving towards the use of independent judicial or arbitration mechanisms that issue binding decisions on disputes, with ad hoc arbitration tribunals leading by a significant margin. In practice, however, the proliferation of regional trade agreements has not led to an increase in the number of trade disputes being dealt with under the relevant regional mechanisms. The vast majority of such mechanisms remain unused due to the fact that states parties to such agreements still prefer to consider disputes between themselves at the level of the World Trade Organization, despite the termination of the activities of the WTO Appellate Body. Regional mechanisms are used primarily to resolve disputes that concern issues outside the WTO (such as compliance with labour standards, health and safety, and the environment).</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>региональные торговые соглашения</kwd><kwd>механизмы разрешения споров</kwd><kwd>Таможенный союз</kwd><kwd>зона свободной торговли</kwd><kwd>Всемирная торговая организация</kwd><kwd>разрешение международных торговых споров</kwd><kwd>постоянно действующий суд</kwd><kwd>ad hoc арбитраж</kwd><kwd>дипломатический механизм</kwd><kwd>юрисдикционный механизм</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>regional trade agreements</kwd><kwd>dispute resolution mechanisms</kwd><kwd>customs union</kwd><kwd>free trade area</kwd><kwd>World Trade Organization</kwd><kwd>resolution of international trade disputes</kwd><kwd>permanent court</kwd><kwd>ad hoc arbitration</kwd><kwd>diplomatic mechanism</kwd><kwd>jurisdictional mechanism</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Боклан Д. С. Евразийский экономический союз и Всемирная торговая организация: соотношение правовых режимов // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. - 2017. - № 2. - С. 223-236.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boklan D. S. Evraziyskiy ekonomicheskiy soyuz i Vsemirnaya torgovaya organizatsiya: sootnoshenie pravovykh rezhimov // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. - 2017. - № 2. - S. 223-236.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Исполинов А. С. Что скрывается за броским термином «интеграционное правосудие»? // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. - 2017. - № 3. - С. 105-120.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ispolinov A. S. Chto skryvaetsya za broskim terminom «integratsionnoe pravosudie»? // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. - 2017. - № 3. - S. 105-120.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кожеуров Я. С. Институты международного правосудия и право Евразийского экономического союза: «Cмотр правовых сил» // Российский юридический журнал. - 2016. - № 4. - С. 94-112.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kozheurov Ya. S. Instituty mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya i pravo Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza: «Cmotr pravovykh sil» // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 2016. - № 4. - S. 94–112.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Колос Д. Г. Конкуренция юрисдикции органов по разрешению споров ВТО и региональных торговых соглашений: уроки и перспективы для ЕАЭС // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 11, Право. - 2022. - № 3. - С. 21-41.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kolos D. G. Konkurentsiya yurisdiktsii organov po razresheniyu sporov VTO i regionalnykh torgovykh soglasheniy: uroki i perspektivy dlya EAES // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11, Pravo. - 2022. - № 3. - S. 21-41.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Смбатян А. С. ВТО и региональные интеграционные объединения: соотношение «правовых сил» в урегулировании торговых споров // Российский внешнеэкономический вестник. - 2011. - № 8. - С. 74-82.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smbatyan A. S. VTO i regionalnye integratsionnye obedineniya: sootnoshenie «pravovykh sil» v uregulirovanii torgovykh sporov // Rossiyskiy vneshneekonomicheskiy vestnik. - 2011. - № 8. - S. 74-82.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Солнцев А. М., Голубев В. В. ВТО и региональные интеграционные объединения: конкуренция юрисдикций и применимых принципов права при разрешении межгосударственных споров // Вестник ВолГУ. Серия 5, Юриспруденция. - 2013. - № 1. - С. 93-98.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solntsev A. M., Golubev V. V. VTO i regionalnye integratsionnye obedineniya: konkurentsiya yurisdiktsiy i primenimykh printsipov prava pri razreshenii mezhgosudarstvennykh sporov // Vestnik VolGU. Seriya 5, Yurisprudentsiya. - 2013. - № 1. - S. 93-98.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Трунк-Федорова М. П. Разрешение споров в рамках соглашений о свободной торговле: альтернатива механизму Всемирной торговой организации? // Международное правосудие. - 2019. - № 3 (31). - С. 102-113.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trunk-Fedorova M. P. Razreshenie sporov v ramkakh soglasheniy o svobodnoy torgovle: alternativa mekhanizmu Vsemirnoy torgovoy organizatsii? // Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie. - 2019. - № 3 (31). - S. 102–113.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boklan D., Lifshits I. Eurasian Economic Union Court and WTO Dispute Settlement Body: Two Housewives in One Kitchen // Russian Law Journal. - 2019. - Vol. 7. - No. 3. P. 169-193.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boklan D., Lifshits I. Eurasian Economic Union Court and WTO Dispute Settlement Body: Two Housewives in One Kitchen // Russian Law Journal. - 2019. - Vol. 7. - No. 3. P. 169-193.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chase C., Yanovich A., Crawford J., Ugaz P. Mapping of Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Regional Trade Agreements - Innovative or Variations on a Theme? // Regional Trade Agreements and the Trading System / R. Acharya (ed.). - Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2016. - P. 608-702.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chase C., Yanovich A., Crawford J., Ugaz P. Mapping of Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Regional Trade Agreements - Innovative or Variations on a Theme? // Regional Trade Agreements and the Trading System / R. Acharya (ed.). - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. - P. 608-702.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Falls S. Outsourcing FTA Dispute Settlement Administration to Third-Party International Arbitral Institutions: Opportunities and the Role of the Permanent Court of Arbitration // The Law &amp; Practice of International Courts and Tribunals. - 2020. - Vol. 19. - No. 1. - P. 49-78.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Falls S. Outsourcing FTA Dispute Settlement Administration to Third-Party International Arbitral Institutions: Opportunities and the Role of the Permanent Court of Arbitration // The Law &amp; Practice of International Courts and Tribunals. - 2020. - Vol. 19. - No. 1. - P. 49-78.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Furculita C. (2020). FTA Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: Alternative Fora for Trade Disputes-The Case of CETA and EUJEPA // Weiß W., Furculita C. (eds.). Global Politics and EU Trade Policy. European Yearbook of International Economic Law. Springer. Cham. - P. 442-469.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Furculita C. (2020). FTA Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: Alternative Fora for Trade Disputes-The Case of CETA and EUJEPA // Weiß W., Furculita C. (eds.). Global Politics and EU Trade Policy. European Yearbook of International Economic Law. Springer. Cham. - P. 442-469.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Graewert T. Conflicting Laws and Jurisdictions in the Dispute Settlement Process of Regional Trade Agreement and the WTO // Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal. - 2008. - № 1. - P. 287-334.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Graewert T. Conflicting Laws and Jurisdictions in the Dispute Settlement Process of Regional Trade Agreement and the WTO // Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal. - 2008. - № 1. - P. 287-334.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Marceau G. The primacy of the WTO dispute settlement system // QIL. - 2015. - Vol. 23. - P. 3-13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marceau G. The primacy of the WTO dispute settlement system // QIL. - 2015. - Vol. 23. - P. 3-13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pauwelyn J. Going Global, Regional, or Both? Dispute Settlement in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and Overlaps with the WTO and Other Jurisdictions // Minnesota Journal of International Law. - 2004. - Vol. 13. - No. 2. - P. 231-304.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pauwelyn J. Going Global, Regional, or Both? Dispute Settlement in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and Overlaps with the WTO and Other Jurisdictions // Minnesota Journal of International Law. — 2004. - Vol. 13. - No. 2. - P. 231-304.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pauwelyn J., Salles L. Forum Shopping before International Tribunals: (Real) Concerns, (Im)Possible Solutions // Cornell International Law Journal. - 2009. - Vol. 42. - No. 1. - P. 77-118.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pauwelyn J., Salles L. Forum Shopping before International Tribunals: (Real) Concerns, (Im)Possible Solutions // Cornell International Law Journal. - 2009. - Vol. 42. - No. 1. - P. 77-118.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Porges A. Dispute Settlement // Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development: A Handbook / J. Chauffour, J. Maur (eds.). - Washington D. C. : The World Bank, 2011. - P. 467-501.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Porges A. Dispute Settlement // Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development: A Handbook / J. Chauffour, J. Maur (eds.). - Washington D. C.: The World Bank, 2011. - P. 467-501.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vidigal G. Regional Trade Adjudication and the Rise of Sustainability Disputes: Korea - Labor Commitments and Ukraine - Wood Export Bans // American Journal of International Law. - 2022. - Vol. 116. - No. 3. - P. 567-578.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vidigal G. Regional Trade Adjudication and the Rise of Sustainability Disputes: Korea - Labor Commitments and Ukraine - Wood Export Bans // American Journal of International Law. - 2022. - Vol. 116. - No. 3. - P. 567-578.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
