Constitutional Rights in the Sphere of Entrepreneurial Activity and Peculiarities of Holders of Such Constitutional Rights

Constitutions of the majority of countries of the world contain a detailed catalogue of human and civil rights and freedoms that tends to expand. At the same time, the essence of economic rights is defined in the regulation of the rights of the “second” generation and is associated with the recognition of property rights and the right to carry out activities aimed at obtaining income. In the process of drafting modern constitutions, States only specify the rights in question. The constitutional right to the free use of one’s abilities and property for entrepreneurial and other economic activities not prohibited by law is considered in this article as a basic, but not the only right in the sphere of entrepreneurial activity. A special feature of the implementation of the right under consideration is its special range of holders of the right in question. It is concluded that the construction of Article 34 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation has a two-component structure (denotes two types of activity: entrepreneurial and other economic activities). Such a design determines the definition of the range of holders of the right under consideration: the range of holders of the right depends on whether the issue involves only entrepreneurial or any other economic activities.

1. Arbatskaya Yu. V. Strategicheskiy audit: pravovye problemy i perspektivy // Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya : Istoriya i pravo. — 2014. — № 1. — S. 75—79.

2. Belykh S. V. Ekonomicheskaya deyatel’nost’ kak konstitutsionno-pravovaya kategoriya: ponyatie, priznaki // Biznes, menedzhment i pravo. — 2006. — № 3. — S. 44—47.

3. Laptev V. A. Konstitutsiya Rossii kak osnovnoy istochnik predprinimatel’skogo prava // Lex Russica. — 2015. —№ 6. — S. 39—47.

4. Prava cheloveka. Mezhdunarodnye i rossiyskie mekhanizmy zashchity / A. Azarov, V. Royter, K. Khyufne ; pod red. A. Azarova. — M. : Moskovskaya shkola prav cheloveka, 2003. —560 c.

5. Prikhod’ko T. V. Sovremennaya model’ ogranicheniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Federativnoy Respublike Germaniya : konstitutsionno-pravovoe issledovanie : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Omsk, 2017. — 200 s.

6. Pryakhina N. I., Shchepel’kov V. F. Sotsial’no-pravovye osnovaniya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za moshennichestvo v sfere predprinimatel’skoy deyatel’nosti // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. — 2015. — T. 9. — № 2. — S. 277—289.

7. Sidorov V. A., Kuznetsova E. L., Bolik A. V. Obshchaya ekonomicheskaya teoriya : uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov. — Maykop : ElIT, 2017. — 603 s.

8. Tyukavkin-Plotnikov A. A. O sisteme priznakov predprinimatel’skoy deyatel’nosti // Aktual’nye problemy pravotvorchestva i pravoprimenitel’noy deyatel’nosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii : materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (12 noyabrya 2011 g.). — Irkutsk, 2011. — S. 232—235.

9. Finansovo-kreditniy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ / pod obshch. red. A. G. Gryaznovoy. — M. : Finansy i statistika, 2002. — 1168 s.

10. Chegovadze L. A. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatiy predprinimatel’skoy i ekonomicheskoy deyatel’nosti // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya : Pravo. — 2001. — № 2. — S. 41—48.

11. Chuksina V. V. Globalizatsiya, prava cheloveka i obyazannosti gosudarstva // Izvestiya Irkutskoy gosudarstvennoy ekonomicheskoy akademii (Baykal’skiy gosudarstvenniy universitet ekonomiki i prava). — 2010. — № 6.

12. Ruggie J. G. Business and Human Rights // The Dovenschmidt Quarterly. — 2013. — № 4. — P. 168—170.