Organized Crime as a Form of Self-Determination of Crime
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.98.1.156-162
Abstract
The paper discusses the influence of organized crime on the criminalization of modern Russian society — the so-called self-determination of crime. To effectively counteract the self-determination of crime, a comprehensive study of all its forms and mechanisms is necessary, special emphasis should be placed on organized crime due to its heightened social danger. The proposed approach allows a deeper and more precise study of self-determination of organized crime and related phenomena. Recently, there has been a transformation of domestic organized crime into economic crime, which explains the deep criminalization of the Russian economy. The paper also discusses another form of self-determination of crime that is closely related to organized crime — corruption. The Russian experience in combating organized crime highlights the need to develop an integrated strategy in this area. The results of the study can be applied in the educational process in the study of the Criminology Course in higher educational institutions.
About the Author
E. V. BochkarevaRussian Federation
Bochkareva Elena Vadimovna, Postgraduate of the Department of Criminology and Penal Law
125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
References
1. Astanin V. V. Antikorruptsionnaya politika Rossii: kriminologicheskie aspekty : avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — Μ., 2009. — 37 s.
2. Bochkareva E. V. K voprosu o formakh samodeterminatsii prestupnosti // Vestnik ChelGU. Seriya : Pravo. — 2017. — T. 2. — № 4. — S. 70—74.
3. Volkov V. Ni slova o proshlom // Ekspert. — 2002. — № 15 (322).
4. Gilinskiy Ya. I. Organizovannaya prestupnost’: ponyatie, istoriya, deyatel’nost’, tendentsii // Problemy izucheniya i protivodeystviya organizovannoy prestupnosti : sbornik statey po materialam Vserossiyskogo kruglogo stola. — SPb. : Petropolis, 2015. — S. 25—31.
5. Dmitriev O. V. Ekonomicheskaya prestupnost’ i protivodeystvie ey v usloviyakh rynochnoy sistemy khozyaystvovaniya / otv. red. M. P. Kleymenov. — M. : Yurist”, 2005. — 396 s.
6. Dolgova A. I Prestupnost’, ee organizovannost’ i kriminal’noe obshchestvo. — Μ. : Rossiyskaya kriminologicheskaya assotsiatsiya, 2003. — 572 c.
7. Zornikov D. V. K voprosu o preduprezhdenii «silovogo predprinimatel’stva» v malom predprinimatel’stve // Problemy sotsial’noy i kriminologicheskoy profilaktiki prestupleniy v sovremennoy Rossii : materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. — Μ., 2003. — Vyp. 2. — S. 266—268.
8. Koroleva M. V. Korruptsiya kak faktor samodeterminatsii prestupnosti // Sostoyanie protivodeystviya korruptsii i napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya bor’by s ney : materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. — Μ., 2015. — S. 71—78.
9. Kriminologiya. Osobennaya chast’ : uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata / pod obshch. red. O. S. Κapinus. — Μ. : Yurayt, 2016. — 311 s.
10. Kudryavtsev V. N., Eminov V. E. Kriminologiya : uchebnik. — M. : Norma, 2010. — 800 s.
11. Makarov V. V. Samodeterminatsiya prestupnosti posredstvom ee organizovannykh form // Povolzhskiy pedagogicheskiy poisk. — 2013. — № 4 (6). — S. 142—144.
12. Organizovannaya prestupnost’ / pod red. A. I. Dolgovoy. — M. : Kriminologicheskaya assotsiatsiya, 1998. — 328 s.
13. Topil’skaya E. V. Organizovannaya prestupnost’. — SPb., 1999. — 256 s.
Review
For citations:
Bochkareva E.V. Organized Crime as a Form of Self-Determination of Crime. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(1):156-162. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.98.1.156-162