Texts of religious nature with an extremist-terrorist focus as an object of hermeneutic research and a source of forensically significant information in judicial linguistic expertise
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.101.4.118-127
Abstract
The relevance of the chosen research topic is due to the growing need of investigative and judicial practice in the research of speech works of religious discourse in connection with the rise of extremist sentiments in modern society. Despite the obvious need for expert practice in the development of scientific and methodological support for the examination of texts of religious content, to date they have been poorly studied in terms of their potential conflict. This led to the novelty of the studied topic and its practical significance.
The purpose of the work is to study the problems of using special linguistic knowledge in cases of verbal religious extremism, namely the problems of the theoretical aspect of forensic examination of religious materials (texts of religious discourse) with extremist-terrorist focus.
To accomplish the tasks, a corpus of sources on judicial linguistics (judicial verbal studies), judicial expertology, Russian and foreign legislation, international legal acts, and expert and judicial practice were used.
The author gives his own concept of the relationship between the concepts of «verbal (verbal) extremism», «hate speech» and «verbal religious extremism», highlighting the range of articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation containing offenses correlated with these phenomena.
The paper examines the problem of competence of linguistic experts involved in this category of cases, as well as the problem of the limits of their competence.
About the Author
V. D. Nikishin
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate Student of the Forensic Examination Department,
125993, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
References
1. Abramov A. A. Bor’ba protiv diffamacii religij v rezolyuciyah OON // ZhMP. — 2011. — № 6. — S. 61—75.
2. Brinev K. I. Sudebnaya lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza po delam o religioznom ekstremizme // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2013. — № 376. — S. 20—24.
3. Burkovskaya V. A. Kriminal’nyj religioznyj ekstremizm v sovremennoj Rossii. — M. : In-t pravovyh i sravnitel’nyh issledovanij, 2005. — 49 s.
4. Verhovskij A. M. Cena nenavisti. Nacionalizm v Rossii i protivodejstvie rasistskim prestupleniyam : sb. statej. — M. : Centr «Sova», 2005. — 256 s.
5. Galyashina E. I. Lingvistika vs ekstremizma: v pomoshch’ sud’yam, sledovatelyam, ekspertam / pod red. prof. M. V. Gorbanevskogo. — M. : Yuridicheskij mir, 2006. — 96 s.
6. Galyashina E. I. Sudebnaya ekspertiza verbal’nyh proyavlenij ekstremizma: pravovye i metodicheskie problemy // Ekspert-kriminalist. — 2009. — № 2. — S. 14—16.
7. Gromova N. S. Osobennosti i problemy proizvodstva lingvisticheskoj ekspertizy po delam o prestupleniyah ekstremistskoj napravlennosti // Materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii «Teoriya i praktika sudebnoj ekspertizy v sovremennyh usloviyah», posvyashchennoj pamyati zasluzhennogo yurista RF, doktora yuridicheskih nauk, professora Yuriya Kuz’micha Orlova (g. Moskva, 19—20 yanvarya 2017 g.). — M. : Prospekt, 2017. — S. 109—110.
8. Gromova N. S. Svoboda slova i verbal’nyj ekstremizm v Rossii: lingvo-pravovoj aspekt : monografiya. — Ekaterinburg : Ural’skij institut kommercii i prava, 2015.
9. Dubrovskij D. V. [i dr.] Yazyk vrazhdy v russkoyazychnom Internete : materialy issledovaniya po opoznavaniyu tekstov nenavisti. — SPb. : Izdatel’stvo Evropejskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2003. — 72 s.
10. Evstaf’eva A. V. «Yazyk vrazhdy» v sredstvah massovoj informacii: lingvisticheskie i ekstralingvisticheskie faktory funkcionirovaniya» : avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. — Tambov, 2009.
11. Zelenina O. V., Suslonov P. E. Metodika vyyavleniya priznakov ekstremizma. Processual’nye issledovaniya (ekspertizy) audio-, video- i pechatnyh materialov : nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. — Ekaterinburg, 2009. — 84 s.
12. Kuznecov V. G. Germenevtika i gumanitarnoe poznanie. — M. : Izd-vo MGU, 1991.
13. Kukushkina O. V., Safonova Yu. A., Sekerazh T. N. Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie osnovy sudebnoj psihologolingvisticheskoj ekspertizy tekstov po delam, svyazannym s protivodejstviem ekstremizmu / RFCSE pri Minyuste Rossii. — M., 2011. — 330 s.
14. Litvinov N. D., Litvinova A. N. Literatura i terror : monografiya / Obshchenac. centr «Antiterror». — Novosibirsk, 2007. — 37 c.
15. Nekotorye osobennosti proizvodstva po delam, svyazannym s proyavleniem ksenofobii / otv. red. L. A. Voskobitova. — M. : Amerikanskaya associaciya yuristov pri uchastii «OOO «Variant»», 2011.
16. Orlova O. V. Religioznyj tekst i ekstremizm — dve veshchi nesovmestnye? // URL: http://konference.siberiaexpert.com (data obrashcheniya: 20.06.2017).
17. Otvetstvennost’ za razzhiganie vrazhdy i nenavisti: psihologo-pravovaya harakteristika / pod red. A. R. Ratinova. — M. : Yurlitinform, 2005.
18. Podkatilina M. L. Sudebnaya lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza ekstremistskih materialov : monografiya / pod red. E. I. Galyashinoj. — M. : Yurlitinform, 2013. — 184 s.
19. Rossinskaya E. R., Galyashina E. I., Zinin A. M. Teoriya sudebnoj ekspertizy (Sudebnaya ekspertologiya) : uchebnik / pod red. E. R. Rossinskoj. — 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M., 2016. — 368 s.
20. Ekspertiza v sudoproizvodstve : uchebnik dlya bakalavrov / pod red. Rossinskoj E. R. — M., 2015. — 336 s.
21. Asquith N. The role of verbal-textual hostility in hate crime regulation. Final Report. — London : London Metropolitan Police Service, 2013.
22. Bhikhu P. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. — 2nd ed. — New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
23. Blasphemy, insult and hatred: finding answers in a democratic society // Science and technique of democracy. — 2010. — 47.
24. Delruelle. Incitement to hatred: when to say is to do. Seminar in Brussels, 25 November 2011.
25. Gagliardone I., Danit G., Alves T., & Martinez G. Countering online hate speech. — France : United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2015.
26. International Legal Research Group on Online Hate Speech. Final report. — Council of Europe publishing, 2014.
27. Keen E., Georgescu M., & Gomes R. (eds.) Bookmarks. A manual for combating hate speech online through human rights education. — Hungary: Council of Europe, 1999.
28. Lange Y. (ed.) Living together. A handbook on Council of Europe standards on media’s contribution to social cohesion, intercultural dialogue, understanding, tolerance and democratic participation. Council of Europe publishing, 2009, April. URL: http://www.un.org/en/sc/ctc/specialmeetings/2011/docs/coe/coe-dg-hrlalivingtogether_en.pdf.
29. Lucas B. Methods for monitoring and mapping online hate speech // GSDRC Applied Knowledge Services, 2014, July 14. URL: http://www.gsdrc.org.
30. McGonagle T. Minority rights, freedom of expression and of the media: dynamics and dilemmas // URL: https://sites.google.com/a/alulas.stream/elvinsidney/minority-rights-freedom-of-expression-and-of-themedia-dynamics-and-dilemmas-school-of-human-rights-B01K04XC5U. 2011, December 30.
31. McGonagle T. The Council of Europe against online hate speech: Conundrums and challenges. Expert paper. — Belgrade : Council of Europe Conference of Ministers responsible for Media and Information Society, 2013.
32. Perry B. & Olsson P. Cyberhate: the globalization of hate // Information & Communications Technology Law. — 2009. — 18(2). — URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13600830902814984.
33. Prentice S., Rayson P., & Taylor P. The language of Islamic extremism: Towards an automated identification of beliefs, motivations and justifications // International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. — 2010.
34. Tulkens F. When to say is to do Freedom of expression and hate speech in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. — Strasbourg : Seminar on Human Rights for European Judicial Trainers. — 2012, October 12.
35. Weber A. Manual on hate speech. — Strasbourg : Council of Europe publishing, 2009.
Review
For citations:
Nikishin V.D. Texts of religious nature with an extremist-terrorist focus as an object of hermeneutic research and a source of forensically significant information in judicial linguistic expertise. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(4):118-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.101.4.118-127
Views:
671
Email this article 