Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Dispute resolution by means of blockchain technology

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.101.4.160-167

Abstract

One of the most important technological advances of recent times is the blockchain technology, which is gradually gaining recognition, having a significant impact on a number of industries. At the same time, the most interesting blockchain-based technology is smart contracts, which makes it possible to get rid of intermediaries and significantly reduce the costs the parties to cross-border contracts carry. With the development of new technologies, new types of disputes appear, which can not always be resolved through existing mechanisms, such as the court or international commercial arbitration. As a result, there is a need to modify existing or introduce new mechanisms that are more suitable for resolving disputes in the global digital decentralized economy. One of these mechanisms is blockchain-arbitration. Currently, several projects of such arbitration have been developed, the most interesting of which are CodeLegit, SAMBA and Kleros, each with a certain specificity. At the same time, the Kleros project, which is an attempt to create a decentralized quasi-judicial system for resolving disputes arising from smart contracts, deserves special attention. Analyzing each of these projects, the author points out some problems that may arise when using them, and suggests ways to solve them.

About the Author

O. F. Zasemkova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

PhD in Law, Lecturer of the Department of Private International Law, Lecturer at the Center for International Legal Competitions,

125993, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9



References

1. Genkin А., Mixeev А. Blockchain : Kak eto rabotaet i chto gdet nas zavtra. М. : Alpina Pablisher, 2018. 592 s.

2. Moguayer W., Buterin V. Blockchain dlya biznesa. М.: Eksmo, 2017. 224 s.

3. Swon М. Blockchain. Chema novoi ekonomiki. М.: Olimp-Bisnes, 2017. 240 s.

4. Buterin V. Decentralized Court // URL: https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4gigyd/decentralized_court/?st=jk5uaa08&sh=eae1485f (дата обращения: 29 июля 2018 г.).

5. Buterin V. Schellingcoin: A minimal-trust universal data feed // URL: https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/03/28/schellingcoin-a-minimal-trust-universal-data-feed/ (дата обращения: 29 июля 2018 г.).

6. Hourani S. Cross-Border Smart Contracts: Boosting International Digital Trade through Trust and Adequate Remedies // UNCITRAL Congress on Modernizing International Trade Law to Support Innovation and Sustainable Development. 4—7 July 2017. Vienna.

7. Lesaege Cl., Ast F. Kleros: Short Paper v1.0.5 // URL: https://kleros.io/assets/whitepaper.pdf (дата обращения: 28 июля 2018 г.).

8. Schelling T. The strategy of conflict. — Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 1980. — 309 p.

9. Simpson C. Blockchain Will Improve Int`l Dispute Resolution, Group Says // URL: http://www.miamiblockchaingroup.com/press/Law360%20Press%20Release%20Blockchain%20Will%20Improve%20 Int%27l%20Dispute%20Resolution,%20Group%20Says%20(March%2014 %202018).pdf (дата обращения: 28 июля 2018 г.).

10. Szabo N. Smart Contracts: Building Blocks for Digital Markets. 1996 // URL: http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart_ contracts_2.html (дата обращения: 30 июля 2018 г.).

11. Webb A. 8 Tech Trends to Watch in 2016 // Harvard Business Abstract. URL: https://hbr.org/2015/12/8-techtrends-to-watch-in-2016 (дата обращения: 28 июля 2018 г.).


Review

For citations:


Zasemkova O.F. Dispute resolution by means of blockchain technology. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(4):160-167. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.101.4.160-167

Views: 1407


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)