Detention and Remand in Custody: Comparative Legal Analysis
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.112.3.145-153
Abstract
The paper analyzes the legal regulation of detention in custody of persons confined on suspicion of committing a crime, as well as of persons in respect of whom a measure of restriction in the form of remand in custody was chosen. The norms of the Federal Law “On detention in custody of suspects and accused of committing crimes”, as well as the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation relating to these relations are considered. The differences between the two types of custody are investigated: “detention” and “remand in custody”. The author identifies six fundamental criteria underlying the difference between the two types of custody: the grounds for the detention; a person or body authorized to decide on detention in custody; duration of custody; custodial facility; legal status of persons in custody; grounds for release. It is concluded that it is necessary to revise the Federal Law "On detention in custody of suspects and accused of committing crimes", changing its structure on the basis that the law actually regulates two independent processes: taking into custody when detaining a person and detention in custody when choosing a measure of restriction in the form of remand in custody.
About the Author
I. V. KaravaevRussian Federation
Ivan V. Karavaev, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Regime Organization and Supervision Department, Penal Correctional System
ul. Sennaya, d. 1, Ryazan, Russia, 390000
References
1. Vasil’eva Z. V., Kutuev E. K. Mery ugolovno-processual’nogo prinuzhdeniya: ponyatie, celi, vidy i obshchaya harakteristika. Lekciya // Yuridicheskaya nauka: istoriya i sovremennost’. — 2018. — № 11. — S. 113—142.
2. Kalinovskij K. B. Srok soderzhaniya pod strazhej dlya podsudimyh primenyaetsya i k obvinyaemym // Ugolovnyj process. — 2018. — № 9 (165).
3. Karavaev I. V., Suharev S. N., Prokudin V. V. Sootnoshenie principov soderzhaniya pod strazhej i principov ugolovno-ispolnitel’nogo zakonodatel’stva // Evrazijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. — 2018. — № 8 (123). — S. 264—266.
4. Kachalova O. V. Obosnovannost’ podozreniya kak uslovie zaklyucheniya pod strazhu: pozicii Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka i rossijskaya praktika // Rossijskoe pravosudie. — 2018. — № 3 (143). — S. 100—105.
5. Malysheva O. A., Lyatifov R. G. Zaklyuchenie pod strazhu lica v celyah ego vydachi dlya ugolovnogo presledovaniya ili ispolneniya prigovora : nauchno-prakticheskij ocherk. — Ryazan’, 2017. — 52 s.
6. Retyunskih I. A. Ob osnovaniyah zaderzhaniya lica, podozrevaemogo v sovershenii prestupleniya // Vestnik Ural’skogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. — 2016. — № 1. — S. 18—21.
7. Shestak V. A. O sovershenstvovanii processual’nyh norm, reglamentiruyushchih sroki soderzhaniya pod strazhej i poryadok ih prodleniya // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyj zhurnal. — 2018. — № 1 (36). — S. 114—117.
Review
For citations:
Karavaev I.V. Detention and Remand in Custody: Comparative Legal Analysis. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(3):145-153. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.112.3.145-153