THE MEANINGS OF LAW, POLITICS, MORALITY: THE PROBLEM OF INTERACTION
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.102.5.024-033
Abstract
The problem of interaction of the semantic field of law, politics and morality has not been thoroughly dealt with in modern humanitarian literature despite the fact that the concept of the semantic field is known to humanitarians for a long time, and in separate disciplines (linguistics, cultural studies, psychology) it has been thoroughly elaborated in the process of development of the subject of the sciences in question. The purpose of the article is to identify the meaning and scope of the use of the concept of the semantic field in law, politics and moral sphere of the society, as well as to identify the problem of interaction of these fields, to propose ways of resolving the main problems encountered during the analysis. The research methodology applied by the authors represents a complex combination of ideas of dialectics, synergetics, hermeneutics, phenomenology, communication, as well as a normative-axiological approach to law. Sources on philosophy, politics, psychology, morality and law have been used. The main results of the research are as follows: the analysis of the concept of the semantic field in each of the proposed areas of social knowledge requires a meaningful reinterpretation of the conceptual apparatus and filling its elements with the meaning that corresponds to the goals, objectives and nature of the subject of the science in question, which also affects the peculiarities of the applied methods of cognition.
About the Author
Y. A. GAVRILOVARussian Federation
GAVRILOVA Yuliya Aleksandrovna, PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and History of Law and the State
400062, Russia, Volgograd, Universitetskiy prosp., d. 100
References
1. Alekseev S. S. Obshchaya teoriya prav : v 2 t. — M. : Yurid. lit., 1982. — T. 2. — 360 s.
2. Apresyan R. G. Moral’ // Novaya filosofskaya enciklopediya : v 4 t. — 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. — M. : Mysl’, 2010. — T. 2. — 634 s.
3. Voronkov S. S. Obshchaya dinamika. — Pskov : Kvadrant, 2008. — 155 s.
4. Gavrilova Yu. A. Ponyatie smyslovogo polya prava // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 5 : Yurisprudenciya. — 2008. — № 10. — S. 44—49.
5. Gavrilova Yu. A. Ponyatie tolkovaniya prava v kontekste idei smyslovogo polya // Vestnik Saratovskoj gosudarstvennoj akademii prava. — 2007. — № 5. — S. 34—38.
6. Duka O. G. Teoriya smyslovogo polya. — Omsk : Izd-vo OmGPU, 2009. — 122 s.
7. Ermolina L. A. Chelovek v prostranstve i vremeni kak v kul’turno-smyslovom pole // Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. — 2015. — № 12. — S. 19—22.
8. Zalevskaya A. A. Psiholingvisticheskie issledovaniya. Slovo. Tekst : izbrannye trudy. — M. : Gnozis, 2005. — 543 s.
9. Kistyakovskij B. A. Filosofiya i sociologiya prava (Russkaya sociologiya XX veka). — SPb. : RHGI, 1999. — 800 s.
10. Makiavelli N. Gosudar’. — M. : Planeta, 1990. — 80 s.
11. Mal’ko A. V. Teoriya pravovoj politiki. — M. : Yurlitinform, 2012. — 328 s.
12. Rozin V. M. Problema i tri znacheniya social’noj spravedlivosti // Elektronnyj filosofskij zhurnal Vox / Golos. Vyp. 14. 2013. Iyun’. S. 1—27. URL: http://vox-journal.org (data obrashcheniya: 24.09.2016).
13. Sledzevskij I. V. Dialog civilizacij kak smyslovoe pole mirovoj politiki // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. — 2011. — № 2. — S. 141—156.
14. Stepanov Yu. S. Konstanty : Slovar’ russkoj kul’tury. — Izd. 3-e, ispr. i dop. — M. : Akademicheskij proekt, 2004. — 992 s.
15. Stepin V. S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. — M. : Gardariki, 1999. — 400 s.
16. Strelec Yu. Sh. Smysl zhizni cheloveka v filosofsko-antropologicheskom izmerenii. — Orenburg : OGU, 2003. — 139 s.
17. El’konin D. B. Psihologiya igry. — M. : Pedagogika, 1978. — 360 s.
Review
For citations:
GAVRILOVA Y.A. THE MEANINGS OF LAW, POLITICS, MORALITY: THE PROBLEM OF INTERACTION. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(5):24-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.102.5.024-033