LEGAL FORECASTING IN THE FIELD OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN THE CONTEXT OF DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.103.6.058-072
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of possibilities of application of methods and means of legal forecasting for law-making, judicial law-enforcement and rendering legal assistance in the context of the development of information technology in civil proceedings. Forecasting technologies are being examined on the example of the analysis of one of draft laws in the context of civil proceedings. The article deals with the issues of formation of working groups of futurologists, data collection during examination of the forecast background using digital technologies, creation of forecast legal models in assessing legal risks with the use of computer software applications. The author emphasizes the importance of participation of academic community in legal forecasting, as well as the need to develop the foundations of legal regulation of the use of prognostic technologies and the need for the State control in this area.
Keywords
juridical (legal,predictive) forecast,
judicial enforcement,
lawmaking,
prognostic legal situation,
forecast background,
forecast model,
legal monitoring,
information technology,
artificial intelligence,
procedural risks
Supporting agencies: As part of implementation of the grant of RFBR 18-29-16060 for the year 2018 «The Influence of Digital Technologies on Civil and Administrative Proceedings.» The Article is written using the RLS «ConsultantPlus».
About the Author
I. I. Chernykh
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure
125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
References
1. Barsegyan A. L. Avtomatizirovannoe prikaznoe proizvodstvo. Vtorzhenie v pravosudie ili horoshaya optimizaciya? // URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2018/2/14/avtomatizirovannoe_prikaznoe_proizvodstvo_vtorzhenie_v_pravosudie_ili_horoshaya_optimizaciya.
2. Borisova E. A. Snizhenie sudebnoj nagruzki stavitsya vo glavu preobrazovanij processual’nogo zakonodatel’stva // Garant.ru. URL: http://www.garant.ru/interview/1144157/#ixzz5hmtVwGip.
3. Vasil’kova S. V. Doktrinal’nyj i prakticheskij aspekty primeneniya kategorii «processual’nyj risk» v sfere elektronnogo pravosudiya // Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa. — 2018. — № 4. — S. 87—95.
4. Gavrilov O. A. Strategiya pravotvorchestva i social’noe prognozirovanie. — M., 1993. — 128 c.
5. Gatilova A. S. K voprosu o tekhnologii pravovogo prognozirovaniya // Vestnik OGU. — 2012. — № 3 (139). — S. 31—36.
6. Glazyrin V. V., Lapaeva V. V., Morshchakova T. G., Pavlodskij E. A., Syryh V. M., Chesnokova M. D., Yani S. A. Metodologiya i metodika prognozirovaniya effektivnosti dejstviya pravovyh norm. — M., 1986. — S. 88—142.
7. Glazyrin V. V. Prognozirovanie effektivnosti pravovyh norm: vozmozhnyj podhod // Trudy VNIISZ. — Vyp. 41. — M., 1988. — S. 23—33.
8. Egorova N. E., Ivanyuk O. A. Pravovaya real’nost’ i yuridicheskoe prognozirovanie // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2009. — № 12. — S. 152—156.
9. Iricyan A. Tolkovateli sudej: v SShA razrabotali programmu, ugadyvayushchuyu 7 iz 10 reshenij Verhovnogo suda // URL: http://pravo.ru/review/view/124329/?cl=A.
10. Lomteva V. S. Prognozirovanie v pravotvorchestve i pravoprimenenii : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2006. — 23 s.
11. Novichkov V. E. Arhitektura informacionnyh resursov ugolovno-politicheskogo prognozirovaniya: ponyatie, struktura, ob»em // Tavricheskij nauchnyj obozrevatel’. — 2016. — № 10 (15). — S. 83—92.
12. Ovchinskij V., Bineckij A. Sud’ya s iskusstvennym intellektom // URL: http://zavtra.ru/blogs/sud_ya_s_iskusstvennim_intellektom.
13. Pavlodskij E. A. Opyt prognozirovaniya effektivnosti pravovogo akta s pomoshch’yu ekspertnyh ocenok // Trudy VNIISZ. — Vyp. 41. — M., 1988. — S. 71—83.
14. Pogodina I. V. Problemy planirovaniya v rossijskoj yuridicheskoj praktike : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2004. — 23 s.
15. Pravovoj monitoring: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki : monografiya / D. B. Gorohov, V. I. Radchenko, N. N. Chernogor [i dr.] ; pod red. N. N. Chernogora. — M., 2010. — 232 s.
16. Radchenko V. I., Ivanyuk O. A., Plyugina I. V., Cirin A. M. Prakticheskie aspekty prognozirovaniya zakonodatel’stva i effektivnosti primeneniya prognoziruemyh norm // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2008. — № 8. — S. 3—14.
17. Reshetnikova I. V. Teoriya processual’nogo riska // Zakon. — 2012. — № 6. — S. 117—122.
18. Solomon-ml. P. G. Sudebnaya reforma v Rossii // Otechestvennye zapiski: pravosudie v Rossii. — 2003. — № 2. — S. 79—86.
19. Strel’cova E. G. Privatizaciya pravosudiya. — M., 2019. — 271 s.
20. Syryh V. M. Prognozirovanie effektivnosti norm prava na stadii ih razrabotki // Trudy VNIISZ. — Vyp. 36. — M., 1987. — S. 17—28.
21. Tomaev I. O. Big data: vozmozhnosti ispol’zovaniya v yurisprudencii // URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2018/09/25/big_data_vozmozhnosti_ispolzovaniya_v_yurisprudencii#comment_475175.
22. Tumanov D. A. Probely v grazhdanskom processual’nom prave. — M., 2008. — 208 s.
23. Halatov S. Pustye iski // URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2018/04/24/pustye_iski.
24. Halatov S. A. Processual’naya reforma: obsuzhdenie predlagaemyh novell v processual’noe zakonodatel’stvo // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. — 2017. — № 12.
25. Shargorodskij M. D. Prognoz i pravovaya nauka // Pravovedenie. — 1971. — № 1. — S. 40—50.
26. Yudin A. V. Kategoriya «risk» v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa. — 2014. — № 5. — S. 11—53.
Review
For citations:
Chernykh I.I. LEGAL FORECASTING IN THE FIELD OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN THE CONTEXT OF DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(6):58-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.103.6.058-072
Views:
1489
Email this article 