TRANSFORMATION OF PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE INITIAL STAGE OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS, ENSURING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN THE INDUSTRY 4.0 ERA
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.103.6.137-146
Abstract
The paper deals with topical issues of ensuring access to justice in criminal proceedings, and substantiates the need to change the paradigm of the pre-trial proceedings. The new digital reality Industry 4.0 assumes a tremendous pace of development, profound changes in all spheres of society, including criminal proceedings. The author argues that the digital transformation of criminal proceedings in terms of ensuring access to justice is impossible unless the legislative model (algorithm) of the initial stage of criminal proceedings ensuring access to justice is changed. The key point in the transformation of the pre-trial proceedings should be the electronic interaction of the state and society (population) in the new digital reality. There are fundamentally new opportunities for participation in criminal proceedings (including remotely) and new opportunities to influence decision making and control over decision making (automatization of a crime report and the start of investigation registration, the ability to file complaints, petitions, receive notifications, copies of decisions in electronic form).
Keywords
criminal proceedings,
initial stage,
access to justice,
pre-trial proceedings,
digital transformation,
paradigm shift,
state service,
crime report registration automation,
electronic interaction,
electronic document
Supporting agencies: The publication is prepared with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Research Project No. 18-29-16018 «The concept of building criminal proceedings providing access to justice in the conditions of the development of digital technologies».
About the Author
L. N. Maslennikova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Law, Professor, Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure Law
125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
References
1. Abduvalieva A. F. Predposylki i perspektivy vnedreniya elektronnoj formy ugolovnogo dela v deyatel’nost’ sudebnyh organov // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. — 2013. — № 5. — S. 150—164.
2. Akperov R. S. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela v ugolovno-processual’nom prave Rossijskoj Federacii : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — Samara, 2010.
3. Aleksandrov A. S. O doktrinal’noj modeli sovremennogo dokazatel’stvennogo prava Rossii // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj pravovoj akademii. — 2015. — № 5. — S. 7—11.
4. Bormotova L. V. Osobennosti informacionno-kommunikacionnogo obespecheniya ugolovnogo
5. sudoproizvodstva RF // Vestnik OGU. — 2013. — № 3 (152). — S. 24—27.
6. Borozonec N. N. Pravoobespechitel’naya deyatel’nost’ prokurora v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — Krasnodar, 2016.
7. Bykov A. Yu. Pravo cifrovoj ekonomiki: nekotorye narodno-hozyajstvennye i politicheskie riski. — M. : Prospekt, 2018.
8. Gavrilov B. Ya. Rol’ instituta vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela v obespechenii prav poterpevshih na ih dostup pravosudiyu // Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. — 2018. — № 2 (31). — S. 19—27.
9. Gir’ko S. I. Proizvodstvo po ugolovnomu delu doznaniya v sokrashchennoj forme: prognozy i suzhdeniya // Rossijskij sledovatel’. — 2013. — № 21. — S. 2—5.
10. Zuev S. V. Cifrovaya sreda ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: problemy i perspektivy // Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik. — 2018. — № 4. — S. 118—121.
11. Kozhokar’ V. V. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela: voprosy teorii i praktiki : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2016.
12. Markovicheva E. V. Elementy elektronnogo pravosudiya v rossijskom ugolovnom processe // Sovremennoe ugolovno-processual’noe pravo Rossii: uroki istorii i problemy dal’nejshego reformirovaniya : sb. materialov Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., 20—21 oktyabrya 2016 g. — Orel, 2016. — S. 246—249.
13. Maslennikova L. N., Sushina T. E. Optimizaciya sudebnogo kontrolya na nachal’nom etape ugolovnogo
14. sudoproizvodstva // Rossijskaya yusticiya. — 2019. — № 3. — S. 41—43.
15. Okonenko R. I. Dokazatel’stvennoe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii i Soedinennyh Shtatov Ameriki v informacionnuyu epohu: ugolovno-processual’nyj aspekt // Yuridicheskij vestnik SamGU. — 2015. — T. 1. — № 3. — S. 145—149.
16. Osnovy cifrovoj ekonomiki : uchebnoe posobie / koll. avt. ; pod red. M. I. Stolbova, E. A. Brendelevoj. — M. : Nauchnaya biblioteka, 2018.
17. Pastuhov P. S. Elektronnoe veshchestvennoe dokazatel’stvo v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik
18. Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2015. — № 396. — S. 149—153.
19. Poznanskij Yu. N. Elektronnoe ugolovnoe delo v reshenii problemy rassledovaniya ugolovnyh del v razumnye sroki // Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. — 2015. — № 1 (33). — S. 41—44.
20. Ryabopolova Ya. P. Processual’nye dejstviya, provodimye v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: pravovye, teoreticheskie i organizacionnye osnovy : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2013.
21. Sidorov V. V. Aktual’nye voprosy primeneniya sovremennyh cifrovyh tekhnologij pri realizacii principa obzhalovaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. — 2009. —№ 2 (18). — S. 217—220.
22. Sidorov Yu. V. Otlichiya v ponimanii sushchnosti elektronnogo pravosudiya v Rossii i za rubezhom // Uchenye zapiski Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. — 2015. — Avgust № 5. — S. 108—111.
23. Soldatkina O. L. Vozmozhnosti primeneniya tekhnologii blokchejn dlya informatizacii sudebnoj sistemy // Rossijskaya yusticiya. —2019. — № 3. — S. 38—40.
24. Tabolina K. A. Nadzor prokurora za vozbuzhdeniem i rassledovaniem ugolovnyh del : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2016.
25. Chernyshev V. N., Loskutova E. S. Problemy sobiraniya i ispol’zovaniya cifrovyh dokazatel’stv. — 2017. — T. 12. — № 5. — S. 199—203.
26. Shvab K. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyuciya. — M. : E, 2017.
Review
For citations:
Maslennikova L.N. TRANSFORMATION OF PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE INITIAL STAGE OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS, ENSURING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN THE INDUSTRY 4.0 ERA. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(6):137-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.103.6.137-146
Views:
757
Email this article 