Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

The Format of the Result of Intellectual Activity as an Emerging Object of Intellectual Rights

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.104.7.057-066

Abstract

The article investigates the tendency of “formatization” of the results of intellectual activity that is also taking place in cross-border private law relations. On the basis of the analysis of foreign and Russian legal doctrines, jurisprudence and case law, the author comes to the conclusion about the independence of the format as a result of intellectual activity and about the possibility of using formats not only for audiovisual works, but also for some other categories of intellectual property regardless of protectability of the latter as objects of intellectual property rights. Taking into account the above, the author proposes a definition of the concept “format of the result of intellectual activity” that is generic in relation to the concept of “format of an audiovisual work”. The author substantiates the system of concepts included in the scope of the generic concept “format of the result of intellectual activity.” The conclusion is made that the concept of the format of the result of intellectual activity has a significant potential for development as an independent object of intellectual property.

About the Author

A. Yu. Ananieva
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Postgraduate Student of the Department of Private International Law

125993,  Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9



References

1. Anan’eva A. Format audiovizual’nogo proizvedeniya // IS. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. — 2017. — № 4, 5.

2. Gavrilov E. «Format» audiovizual’nogo proizvedeniya i nekotorye voprosy prava intellektual’noj sobstvennosti // SPS «Konsul’tantPlyus», 2016.

3. Gavrilov E. P. Avtorskoe pravo i soderzhanie proizvedeniya // Gavrilov E. P. Pravo intellektual’noj sobstvennosti. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. XXI vek. — M., 2016.

4. Gorchakov A. V. Pravovaya priroda formata audiovizual’nogo proizvedeniya : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2013.

5. Grin’ E. Televizionnaya peredacha kak slozhnyj ob»ekt intellektual’nyh prav: voprosy pravoprimenitel’noj praktiki // IS. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. — 2017. — № 7. — S. 19—24.

6. Zujkova N. V. Pravovaya ohrana logotipa // SPS «Konsul’tantPlyus», 2018.

7. Lutkova O. V. Transgranichnye avtorskie otnosheniya neisklyuchitel’nogo haraktera: material’no-pravovoe i kollizionno-pravovoe regulirovanie : monografiya. — M., 2017. — 208 s.

8. Lutkova O. V. Voprosy ohranosposobnosti ob»ektov avtorskogo prava v transgranichnyh chastnopravovyh otnosheniyah // Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika. — 2016. — T. 12. — № 3. — S. 40—51.

9. Lutkova O. V. Problema ohranosposobnosti proizvedenij s neznachitel’nym urovnem tvorchestva i povtornyh proizvedenij v avtorskom prave zarubezhnyh gosudarstv i RF // IS. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. — 2016. — № 8, 9.

10. Murzin D. V. Neohranyaemye rezul’taty intellektual’noj deyatel’nosti, kotorye dolzhny ohranyat’sya avtorskim pravom // Chastnoe pravo. Preodolevaya ispytaniya. K 60-letiyu B. M. Gongalo / M. V. Bando, R. B. Bryuhov, N. G. Valeeva [i dr.]. — M. : Statut, 2016.

11. Sherstoboeva E. Teleformat kak pravovoj gibrid: problema pravovogo statusa // Intellektual’naya sobstvennost’. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. — 2011. — № 6. — S. 39—46.


Review

For citations:


Ananieva A.Yu. The Format of the Result of Intellectual Activity as an Emerging Object of Intellectual Rights. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(7):57-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.104.7.057-066

Views: 653


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)