Legal Status of the Immigration Bureau of Japan
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.104.7.141-147
Abstract
The paper is aimed at studying the features of the migration legislation of Japan and the study of the legal status of the immigration bureau of this state. Japan is a country that has passed a special path of historical development. In many ways, this specificity was due to the state policy of isolationism. The existing cultural traditions largely determine the attitude of the Japanese government to immigration. The paper studies the history of the formation of migration control authorities of the state in question, the peculiarities of the legal status of the Immigration Bureau of the Ministry of Justice of Japan and its structure, analyzes the powers of the Immigration Bureau employees. The paper also provides information on the size of the Immigration Bureau and state funding of the activities of this body.
About the Authors
I. V. KarpovaRussian Federation
Deputy Head of the External Labor Migration Department , Colonel of Internal Service in Retirement, State Counselor of the Russian Federation, 3rd class, PhD in Economics
101000, Russia, Moscow, Chistoprudny bulvar, d. 12, korp. 3, kv. 50
K. A. Karpov
Russian Federation
Master’s Degree
125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
References
1. Bezborodova T. M. K voprosu ob opredelenii ponyatiya i administrativno-pravovogo statusa trudovogo migranta // Problemy sovremennoj ekonomiki. — 2011. — № 4. — S. 90—93.
2. Konstitucii zarubezhnyh stran: Velikobritaniya, Franciya, Germaniya, Italiya, Evropejskij Soyuz, Soedin. Shtaty Ameriki, Yaponiya, Indiya : ucheb. posobie / sost. sb., per., avt. vved. i vstup. st. V. V. Maklakov. — 5-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M. : Volters Kluver, 2006. — 581 s.
3. Plyugina I. V. Ponyatie migranta i osnovnye kategorii migrantov // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2007. — № 8 (128). — S. 107—115.
Review
For citations:
Karpova I.V., Karpov K.A. Legal Status of the Immigration Bureau of Japan. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(7):141-147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.104.7.141-147