Approaches to arbitrability determination: arbitrability, jurisdiction and competence correlation
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.105.8.095-107
Abstract
The paper considers the issues of such a phenomenon as arbitrability, as well as its correlation with the categories of jurisdiction and competence. The study of arbitrability is relevant in the light of the resonant practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on issues of arbitrability of certain categories of disputes that has been taking place in recent years. Arbitrability is a relatively new term in domestic science and practice. Although it has received quite a wide resonance, it still not implemented in domestic regulatory legal acts. The author attempts to determine arbitrability, as well as considers existing approaches and views on arbitrability. Foreign and domestic doctrinal views on arbitrability are divided, as well as various understandings of this phenomenon. An important aspect is the differentiation of competence, jurisdiction and arbitrability. The need for diligent work to create and develop “rules of arbitrability” and “elements of arbitrability” at the legislative level is noted. The author notes that arbitrability is also a process of research by the arbitration or court of the elements that make it up.
About the Author
V. V. Eremin
St. Petersburg Investment Committee
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Specialist of the Legal Department,
191124, St. Petersburg, ul. Tverskaya, d. 20
References
1. Abova T. E. Izbrannye trudy. Grazhdanskij i arbitrazhnyj process. Grazhdanskoe i hozyajstvennoe pravo. — M. : Statut, 2007. — 1134 s.
2. Arbitrazh (tretejskoe razbiratel’stvo) v Rossijskoj Federacii : uchebnik dlya bakalavriata i magistratury / O. Yu. Skvorcov. — M. : Yurajt, 2017. — 239 s.
3. Bruckij A. V. Nekotorye voprosy praktiki primeneniya ogovorki o publichnom poryadke pri rassmotrenii gosudarstvennymi sudami zayavlenij ob otmene (vydache ispolnitel’nogo lista na prinuditel’noe ispolnenie) sostoyavshihsya arbitrazhnyh reshenij // Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa. — 2018. — № 4. — S. 229—246.
4. Vershinin A. P. Vybor sposoba zashchity grazhdanskih prav. — SPb. : SFPK SPb.GU, 2000. — 384 s.
5. Zarubina M. N., Katukova S. Yu. Princip effektivnoj interpretacii tretejskogo soglasheniya // Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa. — 2018. — № 4. — S. 267—278.
6. Karabel’nikov B. R. Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh : uchebnik. — M. : Infotropik Media, 2012. — 554 s.
7. Kolomiec A. I. Osobennosti proyavleniya sub»ektivnoj arbitrabel’nosti v praktike zaklyucheniya mezhdunarodnyh arbitrazhnyh soglashenij // Pravo i ekonomika. — 2014. — № 8. — S. 55—61.
8. Kurochkin S. A. Arbitrabel’nost’ i podvedomstvennost’: voprosy teorii // Tretejskij sud. — 2015. — № 1 (97). — S. 32—46.
9. Kurochkin S. A. Podvedomstvennost’ del tretejskim sudam // Rossijskij ezhegodnik grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo processa. — 2002—2003. — № 2. — S. 322—331.
10. Kurochkin S. A. Tretejskoe razbiratel’stvo i mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh. — M. : Statut, 2017. — 288 s.
11. Lebedev S. N. Izbrannye trudy po mezhdunarodnomu kommercheskomu arbitrazhu, pravu mezhdunarodnoj torgovli, mezhdunarodnomu chastnomu pravu, chastnomu morskomu pravu / sost. A. I. Muranov ; Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj institut mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij (Universitet) MID Rossii, kafedra mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo i grazhdanskogo prava. — M. : Statut, 2009. — 717 s.
12. Lebedev S. N. Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh: kompetenciya arbitrov i soglashenie storon / TPP SSSR. — M., 1988. — 124 s.
13. Lebed’ K. A. Rol’ arbitrazhnyh sudov v zashchite grazhdanskih prav // Rol’ grazhdanskogo prava v sovremennyh ekonomicheskih usloviyah v Rossii i drugih stranah SNG : v 2 t. / pod red. d. yu. n., prof. T. E. Abovoj. — M. : Institut gosudarstva i prava RAN, 2010. — T. 2. — S. 294—302.
14. Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh : uchebnik / S. A. Abesadze, T. K. Andreeva, V. N. Anurov [i dr.] ; pod red.O. Yu. Skvorcova [i dr.]. — 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — SPb. : Redakciya zhurnala «Tretejskij sud» ; M. : Statut, 2018. — 965 s.
15. Minina A. I. Arbitrabil’nost’: teoriya i praktika mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha. — M. : Infotropik Media, 2014. — 128 s.
16. Sevast’yanov G. V. Pravovaya priroda tretejskogo razbiratel’stva kak instituta al’ternativnogo razresheniya sporov (chastnogo processual’nogo prava). — SPb. : Redakciya zhurnala «Tretejskij sud» ; M. : Statut, 2015. — 450 c.
17. Skvorcov O. Yu. Tretejskoe razbiratel’stvo predprinimatel’skih sporov v Rossii : Problemy, tendencii, perspektivy. — M. : Volters Kluver, 2005. — 704 s.
18. Sposoby razresheniya sporov v raznosistemnyh pravoporyadkah / Yu. A. Artem’eva, E. P. Ermakova, N. A. Kovyrshina, E. P. Rusakova. — M. : Infotropik Media, 2017. — 424 s.
19. Chuprunov I. S. Arbitrabel’nost’: primenimoe pravo i vliyanie so storony sverhimperativnyh norm // Novye gorizonty mezhdunarodnogo arbitrazha : sbornik statej / A. V. Asoskov, F. Belo, N. G. Vilkova [i dr.] ; pod red. A. V. Asoskova, N. G. Vilkovoj, R. M. Hodykina. — M. : Infotropik Media, 2013. — Vyp. 1. — 384 s.
20. Black’s Law Dictionary /ed. in chief : H. C. Black. — 10th ed. — St. Paul : Thomson Reuters, 2014.
21. Arbitrability: International & Comparative Perspectives (= International Arbitration Law Library. Vol. 19) / L. A. Mistelis, S. L. Brekoulakis (eds.). — Alphen aan den Rijn : Kluwer Law International, 2009.
22. Blackaby N., Partasides C., Redfern A., Hunter M. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. — 6th ed. — Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2015.
23. Born G. B. International Commercial Arbitration. — 2nd ed. — Alphen aan den Rijn : Kluwer Law International, 2014.
24. Fouchard Ph., Gaillard E., Goldman B. Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration / E. Gaillard, J. Savage (eds.). — The Hague ; L. ; NY : Kluwer Law International, 1999.
25. Rossini C. English as a Legal Language. — London : Kluwer International Law, 1999.
26. Carbonneau T. E., Janson F. Cartesian Logic and Frontier Politics: French and American Concepts of Arbitrability // 2 Tul. J. Int’l & Comp. L. — 193 (1994). — Pp. 193—222.
Review
For citations:
Eremin V.V. Approaches to arbitrability determination: arbitrability, jurisdiction and competence correlation. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(8):95-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.105.8.095-107
Views:
852
Email this article 