Failure to Сomply with the Legal Requirements Applied to the Deputy (a Case Study of the City of Moscow Legislation)
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.107.10.020-028
Abstract
The study is devoted to such a specific administrative offense as failure to comply with the legal requirements of a deputy that has no parallel in Soviet administrative law. The subject of the analysis covers the norms of regional legislation. Primarily it covers the Code of Administrative Offences of the city of Moscow 2007 and related provisions of other laws of the city of Moscow. Taking into account interconnected legal norms, the author highlights the object of the administrative offense under consideration, defines the concept of “lawful demands of the deputy,” clarifies the content of other elements of the offence, namely: the objective party [sic] (objective element, actus reus), the subject (the offender), and the subjective party [sic] (state of mind, mens rea). At the same time, a number of statutory flaws are revealed and ways of their correction are proposed. In particular, the author highlights combining two administrative offenses with various direct objects in one part of the article of the Code on Administrative Offences of the City of Moscow, lack of a legal definition of the concept of “legitimate demands of the deputy,” lack of administrative responsibility imposed on sitizens for obstruction of the deputy’s work, excessive lenience of the penalty for violation of time limits given for processing the deputies’ requests in comparison with similar administrative offenses of lower public danger.
About the Authors
A. S. KulikovRussian Federation
Anton S. Kulikov, LL.M., Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), Lawyer
10 Potemkina, Kaliningrad, 236041
К V. Chirkin
Russian Federation
Kirill V. Chirkin, LL.M., Postgraduate Student of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology of Lomonosov Moscow State University, deputy of the Municipal Assembly of Lomonosov district of Moscow
10 Potemkina, Kaliningrad, 236041
References
1. Deryuga A. N. Obshchestvennaya opasnost’ — priznak administrativnogo pravonarusheniya? // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2011. — № 8. — S. 48—55.
2. Kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah. Glavy 1—10 : postatejnyj nauchnoprakticheskij kommentarij / pod obshch. red. B. V. Rossinskogo. — M. : Bibliotechka Rossijskoj gazety, 2014. — 800 s.
3. Nauchnye koncepcii razvitiya rossijskogo zakonodatel’stva / otv. red. T. Ya. Habrieva, Yu. A. Tihomirov. — M. : Yurisprudenciya, 2015. — 544 s.
4. Ozhegov S. I. Slovar’ russkogo yazyka / pod red. N. Yu. Shvedovoj. — M. : Sovetskaya enciklopediya, 1973. — 846 s.
5. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii. Obshchaya chast’ : uchebnik / pod red. L. V. Inogamovoj-Hegaj, A. I. Raroga, A. I. Chuchaeva. — M. : Kontrakt, Infra-M, 2008. — 560 s.
Review
For citations:
Kulikov A.S., Chirkin К.V. Failure to Сomply with the Legal Requirements Applied to the Deputy (a Case Study of the City of Moscow Legislation). Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(10):20-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.107.10.020-028