Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Theoretical Aspects of Providing Evidence in Administrative Process

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.108.11.019-026

Abstract

The article deals with theoretical aspects of providing evidence in administrative process. Attention is drawn to the importance of evidence for administrative procedural practice. It is concluded that the administrative process is aimed at understanding the truth in the context of administrative cases. At the same time, evidence in administrative proceedings has its own features that distinguish it from evidence in other types of legal proceedings. One of the major shortcomings is the lack of systematization of administrative and procedural rules. It is noted that the measures of administrative and procedural support are twofold in nature. On the one hand, they can be aim at collecting evidence, on the other hand — at administrative-procedural prevention of offenses and drafting of administrative-procedural documents. An attempt has been made to substantiate that the process of providing evidence is present not only in such traditional administrative proceedings as proceedings in cases of administrative offenses or in administrative and disciplinary proceedings, but also in administrative and procedural proceedings. Attention has been focused on types of administrative and procedural actions undertaken in the process of providing evidence in administrative and procedural proceedings.

About the Author

P. E. Spiridonov
St. Petersburg University of State Fire Service of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia
Russian Federation

Pavel E. Spiridonov - Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and History of the State and Law.

Prosp. Moskovskiy, d. 149, St. Petersburg, 196105



References

1. Averin A. V. Istina i sudebnaya dostovernost' (Postanovka problemy). — SPb. : Izd-vo R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskij centr-Press», 2007. — 466s.

2. Bol'shaya rossijskaya enciklopediya : v 30 t. — T. 9. — M. : Bol'shaya Rossijskaya enciklopediya, 2007. — 767 s.

3. Bol'shoj tolkovyj slovar' russkogo yazyka. — SPb. : Norint, 1998. — 1536 s.

4. Morkovkin V. V., Bogachyova G. F., Luckaya N. M. Bol'shoj universal'nyj slovar' russkogo yazyka. — M. : Slovari XXI veka; AST-Press Shkola, 2016. — 1456 s.

5. Novickij V. A. Teoriya rossijskogo processual'nogo dokazyvaniya i pravoprimeneniya. — Stavropol' : Izd-vo SGU, 2002. — 584 s.

6. Romanenko N. V. O praktike Kvalifikacionnoj kollegii sudej Sverdlovskoj oblasti po privlecheniyu sudej k disciplinarnoj otvetstvennosti // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2015. — № 4. — S. 77—81.

7. Halikov A. N. Novoe ponimanie dokazatel'stv i sistemy dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 2014. — № 9. — S. 45—52.


Review

For citations:


Spiridonov P.E. Theoretical Aspects of Providing Evidence in Administrative Process. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(11):19-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.108.11.019-026

Views: 735


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)