Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Structure of Interrogation of Juvenile Victims of Violent Sex Crimes

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.108.11.126-134

Abstract

The development of a single certified approach to the process of obtaining the testimony of minor victims, the availability of pre-formulated questions in an understandable for a child manner is one of the ways to increase the effectiveness of interrogation. Domestic forensics does not allocate a dedicated structure for questioning juvenile victims of sexual violence. International practice has different protocols, among which we should highlight the NICHD and RATAC, individual achievements of which can be used effectively in the domestic tactics. The working stage of the interrogation must pass through the stages of establishing psychological contact, acquaintance, explanation of the purpose and procedure of the investigative action, small talks, casual talk of a minor about the sexual abuse, questions, and the use of auxiliary elements. Particular attention should be given to the instructions to minors concerning the rules for replies "I do not know, I do not remember, I do not understand", as due to their age they may not clearly understand them. The stage of a minor's casual talk provides little information, so the question stage is of high importance. We offer to pay special attention to the form of questions, since a child, based on it, concludes if the interrogator implies a "correct" answer. Having considered closed, open, direct, non-structural and abstract questions, we conclude that there is some feasibility for using open-ended questions, direct questions as clarifying, while setting other types of questions should be kept to a minimum. Unstructured questions can be used when asking only minors of senior school age, if the level of their development make it possible. Despite the criticism of anatomical dolls and charts, their use is possible in some strictly defined cases, if other means were not effective.

About the Author

I. V. Tozik
Donetsk Academy of Internal Affairs of the DPR
Russian Federation

Irina V. Tozik - Lecturer of the Department of Criminalistics and Forensic Expertise of DAIA DPR, Postgraduate of the Department of Criminology and Forensic Expertise of DAIA DPR.

Ul. Mira, d. 30, g. Snezhnoe, Donetsk People's Republic, 86500



References

1. Aver'yanova T. V., Belkin R. S., Koruhov Yu. G., Rossinskaya E. R.; pod red. prof. R. S. Belkina. Kriminalistika : uchebnik dlya vuzov. — M. : Norma, 2000. — 990 s.

2. Aleksandrov A. S., Grishin S. P., Zejkan Ya. P. Perekhresnij dopit u sudi. Navch.-prakt. posib. — Kiiv : Alerta, 2014. — 528 s.

3. Bertovskij L. V. Osobennosti doprosa detej v vozraste do 7 let // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya : Yuridicheskie nauki. — 2015. — № 3. — S. 113—133.

4. Demidov I. V. Logika : uchebnoe posobie dlya yuridicheskih vuzov / pod red. d-ra filos. nauk, prof. B. I. Kaverina. — M. : Yurisprudenciya, 2000. — 208 s.

5. Klinicheskaya psihologiya : uchebnik dlya vuzov. — 4-e izd. / pod red. B. D. Karvasarskogo. — SPb. : Piter, 2011. — 864 s.

6. Kon I. S. Vkus zapretnogo ploda : Seksologiya dlya vsekh. — M. : Sem'ya i shkola, 1997. — 464 s.

7. Kriminalistika : uchebnik. otv. red. N. P. Yablokov. — 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M. : Yurist", 2005. — 781 s.

8. Makejchik Yu., Podrez O. Obzor protokolov i praktik provedeniya oprosa detej, postradavshih ot nasiliya // URL: http://docplayer.ru/36260354-Obzor-protokolov-i-praktik-provedeniya-oprosa-detey-postradavshih-ot-nasiliya.html (data obrashcheniya: 11 marta 2019 g.).

9. Muhina V. S. Detskaya psihologiya : ucheb. dlya studentov ped. in-tov / pod red. L. A. Vengera. — 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M. : Prosveshchenie, 1985. — 272 s.

10. Pashchenko A. S. Osobennosti taktiki doprosa nesovershennoletnih zhertv domashnego nasiliya // Vestnik VolGU. Seriya 5 : Yurisprudenciya. — 2006. — № 8. — S. 162—166.

11. Rossinskaya E. R. Kriminalistika : uchebnik. — M. : Norma : Infra-M, 2016. — 464 s.

12. Tos P. Sravnitel'nyj analiz podhodov k provedeniyu doprosa nesovershennoletnih. Protokoly NICHD i RATAC: sushchestvenny li razlichiya? // The Link. Official Bulletin of the International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. — 2011. — T. 20. — № 1 (11). — S. 1—11.

13. Anderson J., Ellefson J., Lashley J., Lukas Miller A., Olinger S., Russell A., Stauffer J., Weigman J. The CornerHouse forensic interview protocol: RATAC // CornerHouse forensic interview. — 2010. — Vol. 12. — Pp. 193—331.

14. Children's Testimony: A Handbook of Psychological Research and Forensic Practice, Second Edition / Ed. by Michael E. Lamb, David J. La Rooy, Lindsay C. Malloy, and Carmit Katz. — 2011. — 460 p.

15. Holmes L. S., Finnegan M. J. The Use of Anatomical Diagrams in Child Sexual Abuse Forensic Interviews // Update. — 2002. — Vol. 15. — Number 5. — Pp. 1—4.

16. Kendrick E. Morgan Diagram Debate: The Use of Anatomical Diagrams in Child Sexual Abuse Cases // Liberty University Law Abstract. — 2013. — Vol. 8. — Iss. 1. — Article 5. — Pp. 125—168.

17. Lyon T. D. Twenty-five years of interviewing research and practice: Dolls, diagrams, and the dynamics of abuse disclosure // APSAC Advisor. — 2012. — March. — Pp. 14—19.


Review

For citations:


Tozik I.V. Structure of Interrogation of Juvenile Victims of Violent Sex Crimes. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(11):126-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.108.11.126-134

Views: 1031


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)