International Rules of Prenatal Diagnosis: Common Approaches Analysis
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.108.11.144-152
Abstract
The authors investigate the specifics of international legal regulation of genetic aspects in the field of prenatal diagnostics, and analyze the debates on the reasons for this procedure. Based on the key ideas of genetic scientists on genetic screening, the existence and functioning of negative aspects were revealed; the authors provide proposals for levelling the latter. According to the results of the study it seems productive to develop and regulate a particular position on the conventional level in one of the international acts regulating relations in the field of prenatal diagnosis, followed by the implementation of the relevant national legislation. The position that seems mandatorily upon the occurrence of childbearing age, adapted for the particular rule of law is the following: all subjects are required to pass a comprehensive examination for identification of inherited genetic diseases. With regard to this course of development, the author can see an active implementation of prenatal diagnosis and the state care for the health of future generations.
About the Authors
M. V. Medvedev
Academy of Postgraduate Education of the Federal Clinical Research Centre of Russia's Federal Medical-Biological Agency
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhail V. Medvedev - Dr. ofSci. (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department of Ultrasound and Prenatal Diagnosis.
Volokolamskoe sh., d. 91, Moscow, 125371
G. N. Suvorov
Academy of Postgraduate Education of the Federal Clinical Research Centre of Russia's Federal Medical-Biological Agency
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Georgiy N. Suvorov - Vice-Rector for General Affairs.
Volokolamskoe sh., d. 91, Moscow, 125371
References
1. Vasil'ev A. V., Buharova T. B., Volkov A. V., Bol'shakova G. B., Gol'dshtejn D. V. Vliyanie dalargina na proliferaciyu mul'tipotentnyh mezenhimal'nyh stromal'nyh kletok, dermal'nyh fibroblastov i kletok osteosarkomy cheloveka invitro // Geny i kletki. — 2014. — № 4. — S. 76—80.
2. Genom cheloveka : Enciklopediya, napisannaya chetyr'mya bukvami / V. Tarantul. — M., 2003.
3. Kant I. Ideya vseobshchej istorii vo vsemirno-grazhdanskom plane // Sochineniya : v 6 t. — M., 1966. — T. 6. — S. 12—13.
4. Neonatologiya : uchebn. posobie : v 2 t. / N. P Shabalov. — 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. — M., 2004. — T. 1.
5. Burke K., Clarke A. Genetic Screening // Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics / ten Have H. (ed). — Springer, Cham, 2015. — Pp. 4—5.
6. Fukuyama F. Our Posthuman Future. Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. — N. Y.: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2002.
7. Kulturkampf und Gewissen. Medizinethische Strategien der «Lebensschutz»-Bewegung / Vgl. E. Sanders, K. Achtelik, U. Jentsch. — Berlin, 2018.
8. Palmieri A. L. Graziussi Diagnosi prenatale: morale, deontologia e diritto, capitolo 31 // Medicina dell'eta prenatale Prevenzione, diagnosi e terapia dei difetti congeniti e delle principali patologie gravidiche. — Pp. 551—552.
9. Resta G. R. The first prenatal diagnosis of a fetal abnormality // J. Genet. Counsel. 1997; 6 (1): 83.
10. Shaffer B. The Right to Life, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and Abortion // Penn State International Law Abstract. — 2009. — 2. — Pp. 265—287.
11. Wilson J. M. G. & Jungner G. Principy i praktika skrininga na zabolevanie. — Zheneva : VOZ, 1968.
Review
For citations:
Medvedev M.V., Suvorov G.N. International Rules of Prenatal Diagnosis: Common Approaches Analysis. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(11):144-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.108.11.144-152
Views:
1357
Email this article 