Legitimacy of Power and Constitutional Continuity
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.112.3.089-095
Abstract
The paper analyzes the views of Prof. Ekaterina I. Kozlova concerning the lost values of the procedures institutionalizing the Russian Parliament, the risks of inconsistent implementation of mechanisms of recognition of powers of elected deputies of legislatures, peculiarities of procedures under consideration in other countries. The author has determined the mechanisms of ensuring legitimacy of power. The paper provides arguments in favour of preserving legal traditions, customs and rituals to ensure the stability of the constitutional order. The hypothesis has been put forward that constitutional identity and continuity of historical development are covered by the concept of constitutional continuity. It is concluded that the study of the constitutional continuum as a concept reflecting the natural relations between different conditions of the constitutional order can contribute to the ensuring of the legitimacy of the power and finding the best ways of transforming the constitutional and legal system.
About the Author
S. V. KabyshevRussian Federation
Sergey V. Kabyshev, Cand. Sci. (Law), Professor, Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Giniyatullina L. N. Uchreditel’nyj yuridicheskij process v predstavitel’nom organe municipal’nogo obrazovaniya (po materialam Respubliki Tatarstan) : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — Kazan’, 2007.
2. Zor’kin V. D. Rossiya. Sut’ prava // Pravovedenie. — 2017. — № 3. — S. 4—27.
3. Isaev I. A. Legitimnost’ i legal’nost’ v konstitucionnom processe // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. — 2012. — № 6. — S. 2—6.
4. Kabyshev S. V., Postnikov A. E. Kommentarij k Federal’nomu zakonu «O vyborah deputatov Gosudarstvennoj Dumy Federal’nogo Sobraniya Rossijskoj Federacii». — M., 2003. — 896 s.
5. Kalugina T. V. Konstituirovanie predstavitel’nyh organov Rossijskoj Federacii // Lex russica. — 2016. — № 3 (112). — S. 53—68.
6. Luk’yanov A. I. Parlamentarizm v Rossii (voprosy istorii, teorii i praktiki). — M., 2010. — 304 s.
7. Mityukov M. A. V Gosudarstvennoj Dume (12 dekabrya 1993 g. — 16 yanvarya 1996 g.) : vystupleniya, stat’i, interv’yu, dokumenty, dnevnikovye zapisi. — M., 2014. — 1058 s.
8. Tihomirov Yu. A. Pravoprimenenie: teoriya i praktika. — M., 2008. — 432 s.
9. Chirkin V. E. Legalizaciya i legitimaciya gosudarstvennoj vlasti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1995. — № 8. — S. 65—73.
10. Feyel Ch. Dokimasia: la place et le rôle de l’examen préliminaire dans les institutions des cités grecques. — Nancy : Association pour la diffusion de la recherche sur l’antiquité, 2009.
11. Oliver P. C. The Constitution of Independence: The Development of Constitutional Theory in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Constitutional. — Oxford Univ., 2005.
12. Hauptschriften zur Grundlegung der Philosophie. — 1906. — Bd. 2.
Review
For citations:
Kabyshev S.V. Legitimacy of Power and Constitutional Continuity. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(3):89-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.112.3.089-095