The Experience of Nature Mathematization in Criminal Proceedings Digitalization
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.115.6.125-132
Abstract
The paper explores the problem of theoretical knowledge transformation, the implementation of which is conditioned by the digitalization of legal proceedings. In the context of this problem, the experience of mathematizing nature and society, its similarity and difference with the task of digitalization through the introduction of computer technology in the functioning of the justice system is analyzed. The ontological assumptions and methodological consequences of preparing theoretical knowledge for the processes of mathematization and digitalization are examined in detail. The inclusion and experience of constructing natural and social reality in the task of constructing digital reality is revealed and described. Digitalization itself is being studied both as a kind of cognitive and intellectual technology, and as the improvement of social technology. This action is also considered from the point of view of the correspondence of the experimental and theoretical and conceptual knowledge in the field of criminal proceedings. Heuristic and cognitive capabilities of computer modeling of actions of individuals are revealed on the basis of teleological and causal types of explanation. Cases of the introduction of computer technology in the investigation of crimes and other types of law enforcement practice are considered.
Keywords
About the Author
V. I. PrzhilenskiyRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Professor, Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Sociology
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Бэкон Ф. Сочинения : в 2 т. — М. : Мысль, 1971. — Т. 1. — 568 с.
2. Валеев Д. Х., Нуриев А. Г. Электронный документооборот в сфере правосудия в условиях цифровой экономики // Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки. — 2019. — Вып. 45. — С. 467—489.
3. Воскобитова Л. А. Уголовное судопроизводство и цифровые технологии: проблемы совместимости // Lex russica. — 2019. — № 5 (150). — С. 91—104.
4. Ионин Л. Г. Социология культуры. — М. : Изд. дом ГУ ВШЭ, 2004. — 427 с.
5. Койре А. Очерки истории философской мысли. О влиянии философских концепций на развитие научных теорий. — М. : Прогресс, 1985. — 270 с.
6. Коныгин Р. А., Шестакова Л. А. Использование компьютерного трехмерного моделирования в уголовном судопроизводстве Российской Федерации // Юридический вестник Самарского университета. — 2017. — Т. 3. — № 3. — С. 99—107.
7. Пржиленский В. И., Пржиленская И. Б., Бондаренко Н. Г., Сергодеева Е. А. Лекции по философии науки. — Ростов н/Д : МарТ, 2008. — 544 с.
8. Фуко М. Надзирать и наказывать. Рождение тюрьмы. — М. : Ad Marginem, 1999. — 480 с.
Review
For citations:
Przhilenskiy V.I. The Experience of Nature Mathematization in Criminal Proceedings Digitalization. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(6):125-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.115.6.125-132