Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Approaches to Periodization of the History of Political and Legal Doctrines: Traditions and Criteria

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.117.8.011-021

Abstract

The paper is devoted to several problems. The author investigates the place and role of the history of political and legal doctrines in the system of legal education and science. The new nomenclature of scientific specialties refers this academic subject to theoretical and historical legal sciences, provided no changes are made to the proposed subject description. The main issue articulated in the paper involves the history of political and legal doctrines. This academic discipline is historical, political, legal and theoretical at the same time. Periodization in this case represents periodization of theoretical forms of reflection over political and legal institutions as one of the main problems for a historical discipline. The paper focuses on the fact that the chronological approach to periodization of the history of political and legal doctrines is the main one. However, this approach does not exclude other approaches that are also described in the paper. Moreover, the paper examines traditions established in the science and the student course. Conventionally, the history of political and legal doctrines is investigated chronologically, in a problematic or portrait ways. Needless to say, the author does not exclude the methodological approach to periodization of theoretical and legal forms of cognition of the State and legal institutions.

About the Author

A. V. Kornev
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Arkadiy V. Kornev, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of the Department of Theory of the State and Law

ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, Russia, 125993



References

1. Bulgakov S. N. Hristianskij socializm. — Novosibirsk, 1991. — 350 s.

2. Burde P. O. gosudarstve : kurs lekcij v Kollezh de Frans (1989—1992). — M., 2016. — 720 s.

3. Buchilo N. F., Isaev I. A. Istoriya i filosofiya nauki. — M., 2011. — 432 s.

4. David R., Zhoffre-Spinozi K. Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti. — M., 1996. — 400 s.

5. Dzhessop B. Gosudarstvo. Proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee. — M., 2019. — 504 s.

6. Diogen Laertskij. O zhizni, ucheniyah i izrecheniyah znamenityh filosofov. — M., 1986. — 571 s.

7. Ivin A. A. Teoriya argumentacii. — M., 2007. — 319 s.

8. Ivin A. A., Nikitina I. P. Filosofiya nauki. — M., 2017. — 352 s.

9. Iglton T. Pochemu Marks byl prav. — M., 2017. — 288 s.

10. Istoriya politicheskih i pravovyh uchenij : uchebnik / pod red. V. S. Nersesyanca. — M., 1988. — 816 s.

11. Klyuchevskij V. O. O gosudarstvennosti v Rossii. — M., 2003. — 606 s.

12. Kun T. Struktura nauchnyh revolyucij. — M., 2015. — 320 s.

13. Lazarev V. V., Lipen S. V. Istoriya i metodologiya yuridicheskoj nauki / pod red. A. V. Korneva. — M., 2016. — 496 s.

14. Lafitskij V. I. Sravnitelnoe pravovedenie v obrazah prava : v 2 t. — M., 2001. — T. 1. — 415 s.

15. Lenin V. I. Poln. sobr. soch. : v 55 t. — M., 1969. — T. 30. — 569 s.

16. Marks K., Engels F. Nemeckaya ideologiya / Sochineniya : v 39 t. — M., 1955. T. 32. — 630 s.

17. Mechnikov L. Civilizaciya i velikie istoricheskie reki. — M., 2013. — 320 s.

18. Mitropolit Ilarion (Alfeev). Iisus Hristos. — M., 2019. — 650 s.

19. Ponyatie gosudarstva v chetyrekh yazykah. — SPb. — M., 2002. — 218 s.

20. Filosofskij slovar. — M., 1981. — 445 s.


Review

For citations:


Kornev A.V. Approaches to Periodization of the History of Political and Legal Doctrines: Traditions and Criteria. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(8):11-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.117.8.011-021

Views: 2335


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)