State or Public Figure: Criminal Law Concept
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.114.5.188-198
Abstract
The paper is devoted to a criminal-legal analysis of the main elements of a crime under art.277 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Author considers the nature of infringement on life against a state or public figure, which is committed to end his state or other political activity or out of revenge for such activity. The object of crime is examined in detail; its division into the main and additional object is given. According to the author, the ratio of the main and additional objects does not correspond to theoretical provisions, according to which they should cover public relations protected by the norms of various chapters of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. As part of a crime, provided for in art. 277 of the Criminal Code, the author identifies the victim as an optional element of the object and concludes that in the crime in question the impact is not on the foundations of the constitutional system of Russia, but on the victim, since the attack was directed at him.
About the Author
A. A. Degterev
Astrakhan State University
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law
ul. Tatishcheva, d. 20a, Astrakhan, Russia, 414056
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law
ul. Tatishcheva, d. 20a, Astrakhan, Russia, 414056
References
1. Aguzarov T. K., Gracheva Yu. V., Chuchaev A. I. Oxrana vlasti v ugolovnom prave Rossii (de lege lata i de lege ferenda). — M., 2016.
2. Antonyan Yu. M. Terrorizm. Kriminologicheskoe i ugolovno-pravovoe issledovanie. — M., 1998.
3. Brajnin Ya. M. Ugolovnyj zakon i ego primenenie. — M., 1967.
4. Vetrov N. I. Ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast. — M., 2000.
5. Dikaev S. U. Ugolovno-pravovoj analiz nekotoryx prestuplenij terroristicheskogo xaraktera (st. 277 i 360 UK) // Problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatelstva i pravoprimenitelnoj deyatelnosti : sbornik trudov doktorantov, adyunktov i soiskatelej. — Vyp. 16. — SPb., 2002.
6. Dikaev S. U., Dikaeva I. R. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za prestupleniya terroristicheskogo xaraktera. — M., 2005.
7. Ignatov A. N., Krasikov Yu. A. Kurs rossijskogo ugolovnogo prava : v 2 t. — M., 2002. — T. 2 : Osobennaya chast.
8. Kizilov A. Yu. Ugolovno-pravovaya oxrana upravlencheskoj deyatelnosti predstavitelej vlasti / pod red. A. I. Chuchaeva. — Ulyanovsk, 2002.
9. Klimkina E. I. Ponyatie posyagatelstva v ugolovnom prave // Ugolovno-pravovaya oxrana lichnosti i ee optimizaciya. — Saratov, 2003.
10. Malcev V. Ugolovno-pravovaya oxrana dolzhnostnyx licz i grazhdan v svyazi so sluzhebnoj ili obshhestvennoj deyatelnostyu // Zakonnost. — 1996. — № 1.
11. Naumov A. V. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshhaya chast : kurs lekcij. — M., 1996.
12. Rarog A. I. Kvalifikaciya prestuplenij po subektivnym priznakam. — SPb., 2003.
13. Rudinskij F. M. Lichnost i socialisticheskaya zakonnost. — Volgograd, 1976.
14. Tagancev N. S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Lekcii. Chast obshhaya : v 2 t. — M., 1994. — T. 1.
15. Tenchov E. S., Drachenov A. S. Okonchennoe prestuplenie s tochki zreniya zakonodatelnoj texniki // Voprosy yuridicheskoj texniki v ugolovnom i ugolovno-ispolnitelnom zakonodatelstve. — Yaroslavl, 1997.
16. Ter-Akopov A. A. Problemy lichnosti v ugolovnom prave // Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. — Ryazan, 1994.
17. Troshkin E., Tokmakov S. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za posyagatelstvo na zhizn gosudarstvennogo ili obshhestvennogo deyatelya // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2009. — № 5.
18. Yalovaya V. N. Analiz zakonodatelnogo zakrepleniya posyagatelstv na zhizn, predusmotrennyx st. 277, 295 i 317 UK RF // Ugolovnoe pravo: istoki, realii, perexod k ustojchivomu razvitiyu : materialy VI Rossijskogo kongressa ugolovnogo prava (26—27 maya 2011 g.). — M., 2011.
Review
For citations:
Degterev A.A. State or Public Figure: Criminal Law Concept. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(5):188-198. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.114.5.188-198
Views:
1051
Email this article 