Tax Incentives for Participants of Regional Investment Projects as Preferences
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.117.8.066-074
Abstract
Under the general rule, tex incentives are provided in order to stimulate certain sectors of the economy or activities, contribute to the achievement of social and political objectives before the State. Contemporary tax laws of any country provide many tax incentives, and Russian tax laws are no exception. Meanwhile, tax incentives are in full discretion of the State and are granted at all levels of public power, with the regions having fairly broad powers in this matter. In this regard, without disputing the importance of tax incentivization, it is impossible to fail to notice that the provision of tax incentives may be unequal for the competitors operating on the same commodity market, and some of them, for some reason or other, are not subject to obtaining tax preferences. Moreover, although the tax incentives are provided by the State, the rules for granting them are not related to the procedure intended to grant state preferences under antitrust legislation. The incentives granted at the regional level that may lead to an imbalance in economic entities’ operation in various territories of the Russian Federation are of primery concern. On the example of tax incentives provided for participants of regional investment projects, the paper elucidates the issue of the balance between tax incentives under the Tax Code of the Russian Federation and preferences under antitrust laws. Comparing the essential features of the legal institutions under consideration, the author comes to the conclusion that regional tax incentives should be considered as a type of preferences, although antitrust regulation does not permit proper monitoring of the procedure of granting such preferences.
About the Author
M. V. KamenkovRussian Federation
Maksim V. Kamenkov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Assistant of the Department of Administrative and Financial Law, Law Faculty, S. V. Yashchenkov St. Petersburg Notarial District
22-ya liniya Vasilyevskogo ostrova, d. 7, St. Petersburg, Russia, 199106
References
1. Zaripov V. M. Nalogovaya lgota: ponyatie i osnovnye elementy // Nalogovoe pravo v resheniyah Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii 2011 goda : po materialam IX Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. 20—21 aprelya 2012 g., Moskva. — M., 2013, 256 s.
2. Nalogovoe pravo : uchebnik dlya vuzov/ pod red. S. G. Pepelyaeva. — M. : Alpina Pablisher, 2015. — 796 s.
3. Kamyshanskij V. P. Predely svobody i ogranicheniya prav predprinimatelej v usloviyah konkurencii // Vlast zakona. — 2016. — № 3. — S. 15—25.
4. Knyazeva I. V. Antimonopolnaya politika v Rossii : uchebnoe posobie. — M. : Omega-L, 2011. — 232 s.
5. Petrov D. A. Konkurentnoe pravo: teoriya i praktika primeneniya. — M. : Yurajt, 2013. — 318 s.
6. Plekhanov D. A. O nekotoryh voprosah predostavleniya gosudarstvennyh i municipalnyh preferencij // Aktualnye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2015. — № 9. — S. 103—107.
7. Soloveva N. A. Princip spravedlivosti nalogooblozheniya i nalogovye lgoty // Nalogovoe pravo v resheniyah Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii 2011 goda : po materialam IX Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. 11—12 aprelya 2014 g., Moskva. — M., 2015. — 348 s.
8. Chornovol E. P. Celi predostavleniya hozyajstvuyushchim sub"ektam gosudarstvennyh i municipalnyh preferencij v kontekste zashchity konkurencii // Konkurentnoe pravo. — 2016. — № 4. — S. 35—38.
9. Shipunov V. A. Antimonopolnoe regulirovanie predostavleniya gosudarstvennyh i municipalnyh preferencij // URL: http://bujet.ru/article/196874.php (data obrashcheniya: 15.01.2020).
Review
For citations:
Kamenkov M.V. Tax Incentives for Participants of Regional Investment Projects as Preferences. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(8):66-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.117.8.066-074