Artificial Intelligence in the Administration of Justice: Theoretical Aspects of the Legal Regulation (Articulation of the Issue)
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.117.8.096-107
Abstract
Prospects of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the administration of justice actualize a set of legal issues that are not only applied but also theoretical in nature, including the issue of the formation of the legal concept of “artificial intelligence” for the purposes of legal regulation. The legal academic literature describes a tendency to attribute signs of subjectivity to artificial intelligence, in connection with which the paper attempts to carry out a critical analysis of foundations of such approach. The authors explain inadmissibility of inclusion of such a characteristic as a legal capacity in the concept of “artificial intelligence.” They also argue that in jurisprudence it is useless to apply definitions of artificial intelligence based on the description of technical-technological characteristics because it has no influence on the legal regulation. The incorporation of artificial intelligence as a sociocultural phenomenon into legal reality requires either an independent term for its designation in the field of law or the filling of this concept with a specific legal content. The development of such content should be carried out within the framework of the paradigm of the legal science, since the use of categories and definitions of other branches and spheres of public life without being adopted to the legal field, is unlikely to be effective for the regulatory purposes.
About the Authors
I. N. SpitsinRussian Federation
Igor N. Spitsin, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Civil Procedure
ul. Komsomolskaya, d. 21, Ekaterinburg, Russia, 620137
I. N. Tarasov
Russian Federation
Igor N. Tarasov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Civil Procedure
ul. Komsomolskaya, d. 21, Ekaterinburg, Russia, 620137
References
1. Alekseev N. N. Osnovy filosofii prava. — SPb., 1999. — 216 s.
2. Arhipov S. I. Sovremennye problemy yuridicheskoj nauki : uchebnoe posobie. — Ekaterinburg, 2019. — 404 s.
3. Arhipov S. I. Sub"ekt prava: teoreticheskoe issledovanie. — SPb., 2004. — 469 s.
4. Berzhel Zh.-L. Obshchaya teoriya prava. — M. : Nota Bene, 2000. — 576 s.
5. Vasilev A. A., Shpoper D. Iskusstvennyj intellekt: pravovye aspekty // Izvestiya Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2018. — № 6 (104). — S. 23—26.
6. Vasilev A. A., Shpopper D., Mataeva M. H. Termin «iskusstvennyj intellekt» v rossijskom prave: doktrinalnyj analiz // Yurislingvistika. — 2018. — № 7—8. — S. 35—44.
7. Vasilev A. M. Pravovye kategorii. — M., 1976. — 264 s.
8. Durneva P. N. Iskusstvennyj intellekt: analiz s tochki zreniya klassicheskoj teorii pravosub"ektnosti // Grazhdanskoe pravo. — 2019. — № 5. — S. 30—33.
9. Zakirov R. F. Ispolzovanie sovremennyh IT-tekhnologij kak sredstvo dostizheniya osnovnyh zadach sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa. — 2018. — № 1. — S. 211—219.
10. Iering R. Duh rimskogo prava. — SPb., 1875. — 321 s.
11. Laptev V. A. Ponyatie iskusstvennogo intellekta i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost za ego rabotu // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. — 2019. — № 2. — S. 79—102.
12. Morhat P. M. Iskusstvennyj intellekt: pravovoj vzglyad : nauchnaya monografiya. — M., 2017. — 257 s.
13. Morhat P. M. Pravosub"ektnost iskusstvennogo intellekta v sfera prava intellektualnoj sobstvennosti: grazhdanskopravovye problemy : dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 2018. — 414 s.
14. Neznamov A. V. Klyuchevye diskussionnye napravleniya razvitiya pravovogo regulirovaniya tekhnologij iskusstvennogo intellekta i robototekhniki // Pravo i tekhnologii: v poiskah balansa : sbornik statej / pod red. K. L. Branovickogo. — Ekaterinburg, 2019. — S. 161—171.
15. Ponkin I. V., Redkina A. I. Iskusstvennyj intellekt s tochki zreniya prava // Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya : Yuridicheskie nauki. — 2018. — № 1. — T. 22. — S. 91—109.
16. Popova N. F. Osnovnye napravleniya razvitiya pravovogo regulirovaniya iskusstvennogo intellekta, robotov i ob"ektov robototekhniki v sfere grazhdanskih pravootnoshenij // Sovremennoe pravo. — 2019. — № 10. — S. 69—73.
17. Fedorina A. A. K voprosu o pravovom statuse robototekhniki i iskusstvennogo intellekta // Predprinimatelskoe pravo. Prilozhenie «Pravo i biznes». — 2018. — № 4. — S. 3—8.
18. Haritonova Yu. S. Pravovoj rezhim rezultatov deyatelnosti iskusstvennogo intellekta // Sovremennye informacionnye tekhnologii i pravo : monografiya. — M. : Statut, 2019. — S. 68—83.
19. Yastrebov O. A. Iskusstvennyj intellekt v pravovom prostranstve // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya : Yuridicheskie nauki. — 2018. — T. 22. — № 3. — S. 315—328.
20. Yastrebov O. A. Pravosubektnost elektronnogo lica: teoretiko-metodologicheskie podhody // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. — 2018. — T. 13. — № 2. — S. 36—55.
21. Brozek B. The Troublesome «Person» // Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn. Editors are Visa A. J. Kurki, Tomasz Pietrykowski. — Springer International Publishing AG, 2017. — Pp. 3—14.
22. Guihot M., Matthew A. F. & Suzor N. P. Nudging Robots: Innovative Solutions to Regulate Artificial Intelligence // Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law. — 20 (2). — Рp. 385—456.
23. Russel S. J., Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: А Modern Approach. — Third edition. — Prentice Hall, 2010. — 1132 р.
24. Scherer M. U. Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, and Strategies // Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. — 2016. — Vol. 2. — Рp. 354—400.
25. Searle J. R. Is the Brain's Mind a Computer Program? // Scientific American. — Vol. 262. — No. 1. — 1990. — Pp. 20—25.
26. Solum L. B. Legal personhood for Artificial Intelligences // North Caroline Law Review. — V. 1231. — Vol. 70. — Pp. 1232—1288.
27. Turing A. M. Computing Machinery and Intelligence // Mind, New Series. — Vol. 59. — No. 236 (Oct., 1950). — Рp. 433—460.
28.
Review
For citations:
Spitsin I.N., Tarasov I.N. Artificial Intelligence in the Administration of Justice: Theoretical Aspects of the Legal Regulation (Articulation of the Issue). Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(8):96-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.117.8.096-107