Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

The Role of Theory in the Study of Legal Regulation of Public Procurement

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.116.7.060-067

Abstract

Public procurement is a mainstream of today. We can observe as the scientific field of public procurement continues to expand, since academicians in law, public administration, finance, management and information technology tend to apply their knowledge to study public procurement. Progress in public procurement is equally evident in the political and economic fields, where public procurement is closely linked to problems of social integration, economic growth and environmental sustainability. This raises important questions as to how and by which methods we should research this area. Based on the results of the study, we conclude that applying existing theories to practical challenges has great potential to generate new possible ways of solving problems in the field of public procurement. At the same time the scholars’ will help generate data for the development of new ideas, concepts and even certain theories in the field of public procurement.

About the Author

M. V. Shmeleva
Saratov State Law Academy
Russian Federation

Marina V. Shmeleva, Founder of “Shmeleva & Partners”, Cand. Sci. (Law), Doctoral Student, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Law

 ul. Chernyshevskogo, d. 104, Saratov, 410028



References

1. Agapova E. V., Belyaeva O. A. Granicy transparentnosti publichnyh zakupok. — M. : Rusajns, 2020. — 110 s.

2. Braginskij M. I., Vitryanskij V. V. Dogovornoe pravo. — M., 2000. — Kn. 2 : Dogovory o peredache imushchestva.

3. Vavilin E. V. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskih prav. — 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M. : Statut, 2016.

4. Grinev V. P. Informacionnaya model’ pravovogo regulirovaniya zakupochnoj deyatel’nosti: instrument optimizacii vnosimyh izmenenij // Pravo i ekonomika. — 2019. — № 8. — S. 34—47.

5. Egorova M. A. Mesto samoregulirovaniya v sisteme social’nyh norm // Konkurentnoe pravo. — 2013. — № 2. — S. 19—25.

6. Egorova M. A. Osobennosti soderzhaniya ponyatiya «publichnyj interes» dlya celej antimonopol’nogo regulirovaniya // Yurist. — 2019. — № 6. — S. 56—58.

7. Egorova M. A. Peregovory o zaklyuchenii dogovora (kommentarij k st. 434.1 GK RF) // Pravo i ekonomika. — 2015. — № 12. — S. 20—28.

8. Kikavec V. V. Nalog na gosudarstvennye zakupki kak osnova balansa publichnyh i chastnyh interesov v processe finansovogo obespecheniya gosudarstvennyh i municipal’nyh zakupok v usloviyah razvitiya cifrovoj ekonomiki // Finansovoe pravo. — 2019. — № 5. — S. 38—41.

9. Levushkin A. N. Postavka tovarov dlya gosudarstvennyh nuzhd: sovremennyj vzglyad na problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Sed’moj Permskij kongress uchenyh-yuristov (g. Perm’, 18—19 noyabrya 2016 g.) : sbornik nauchnyh statej / otv. red. V. G. Golubcov, O. A. Kuznecova. — M. : Statut, 2017. — 592 s.

10. Leskina E. I. K voprosu o trudopravovom statuse kontraktnogo upravlyayushchego v sfere zakupok dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennyh i municipal’nyh nuzhd // Yurist. — 2018. — № 2. — S. 37—42.

11. Novaya koncepciya gosudarstvennyh zakupok. Aktual’nye pravovye voprosy [interv’yu s O. V. Anchishkinoj, direktorom departamenta razvitiya Federal’noj kontraktnoj sistemy Ministerstva ekonomicheskogo razvitiya RF] // SPS «Konsul’tantPlyus», 2011.

12. Rodionova O. M. Mery protivodejstviya korrupcii v ramkah cifrovyh zakupok: pravovoj analiz opyta zarubezhnyh stran // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2019. — № 8. — S. 38—42.

13. Tasalov F. A. Unifikaciya trebovanij k uchastnikam zakupki: zarubezhnyj i rossijskij opyt. Chast’ II // Pravo i ekonomika. — 2018. — № 8. — S. 29—36.

14. Tumanyanc K. A., Sinicyna E. D., Intykbaeva S. Zh. Vliyanie gosudarstvennyh zakupok na razvitie malogo predprinimatel’stva v Rossii // Buhgalterskij uchet v byudzhetnyh i nekommercheskih organizaciyah. — 2018. — № 6. — S. 17—28.

15. Cifrovoe pravo: glossarij ponyatij / pod obshch. red. V. V. Blazheeva, M. A. Egorovoj. — M. : Prospekt, 2020. — 64 s.

16. Cifrovoe pravo : uchebnik / pod obshch. red. V. V. Blazheeva, M. A. Egorovoj. — M., 2020.

17. Dimitri N. (2013). Best Value for Money in Procurement // Journal of Public Procurement, 13(2):149—175.

18. Flynn A., McKevitt D. & Davis P. (2013). The Impact of Size on Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Public Sector Tendering // International Small Business Journal. — DOI: 10.1177/02662 42613503178.

19. Grimm R. & Thai K. V. (2011). Editorial: 10th Anniversary Celebration // Journal of Public Procurement, 11(1):i-iv.

20. Gunther McGrath R. (2007). No Longer a Stepchild: How the Management Field Can Come into its Own // Academy of Management Journal, 50(6):1365-1378.

21. Hambrick D. (2007). The Field of Management’s Devotion to Theory: Too Much of a Good Thing? // Academy of Management Journal, 50(6):1346-1352.

22. Matthews D. (2005). Strategic Procurement in the Public Sector: A Mask for Financial and Administrative Policy // Journal of Public Procurement, 5(3):388—399.

23. McCue C. & Prier E. (2008) Using Agency Theory to Model Cooperative Public Purchasing // Journal of Public Procurement, 8(1):1—35.

24. Miller D. (2007). Paradigm Prison, or in Praise of A-theoretic Research // Strategic Organization, 5(2):177—184.

25. Miner J. B. (1984). The Validity and Utility of Theories in an Emerging Organizational Science // Academy of Management Review, 9(2):296—306.

26. Prier E., McCue C. & Behara R. (2010). The Value of Certification in Public Procurement: The Birth of a Profession // Journal of Public Procurement, 10(4):512—540.

27. Simon H. A. (1967). The Business School: A Problem in Organizational Design // Journal of Management Studies, 4(1):1—16.

28. Snider K. F. (2006). Procurement Leadership: From Means to Ends // Journal of Public Procurement, 6(3):274—294.

29. Snider K. F. & Rendon R. G. (2008) Public Procurement Policy: Implications for Theory and Practice // Journal of Public Procurement, 8(3):310—333.

30. Thai K. V. (2001). Public Procurement Re-Examined // Journal of Public Procurement, 1(1):9—50.

31. Van de Ven A. H. (1989). Nothing is Quite So Practical as a Good Theory // Academy of Management Review, 14(4):486—489.

32. Wibowo A. Determining Reasonable Bid Ratios Under Two-Sided Power Distribution Assumption for Public Procurement Under Capped Lowest-Cost Bidding System // International Journal of Procurement Management. — 2019. — Vol. 12, № 2. — Pp. 174—198. — DOI: 10.1504/IJPM.2019.098551.


Review

For citations:


Shmeleva M.V. The Role of Theory in the Study of Legal Regulation of Public Procurement. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(7):60-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.116.7.060-067

Views: 759


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)