The Concept of Four "Bio" in Law and Legislation

Developing biotechnologies have an impact not only on technical, technological and other economic processes, but also on industries and sectors of the economy, public relations, and change the prevailing stereotypes of behavior and habits. In this regard, new sprouts of an innovative economy, and the changing social sphere, the psychology of individual groups and communities determine the need for a unified balanced biopolitics. This policy manifests itself in the provisions of the rule of law and legislation, strategic planning documents, and in law enforcement. Due to the nontriviality of technologies, their great potential opportunities, as well as challenges, risks and threats for the population, society, biopolitics is becoming an important factor in the policy pursued in general. The author proves the need for systemic and comprehensive regulation of biotechnologies allowed for use, taking into account their biological and other types of safety, contribution (positive effects) to the developing bioeconomy and development of society. In connection with the above, the concept of the four "bio" (biotechnology — biosafety — bioeconomics — biopolitics) is proposed, which requires the development of law and legislation based on modern trends in the development of technology, economy, society and the state.

1. Akopov S. Biotekhnologii budushchego // Remedium. — 2015. — № 13. — S. 232—233.

2. Vasilevich N. I. Rossijskie biotekhnologii: budushchee sozdaetsya segodnya // Laboratoriya i proizvodstvo. — 2019. — № 2. — S. 52—57.

3. Gallyamov R. I. Politizaciya nauchnogo znaniya v kontekste biopolitiki // Gramota. — 2019. — T. 12. — Vyp. 9. — S. 101—106.

4. Garbuz S. A. Biotekhnologiya: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee // Nauka, tekhnika i obrazovanie. — 2014. — № 4. — S. 12—15.

5. Zhavoronkova N. G., Agafonov V. B. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie problemy pravovogo obespecheniya ekologicheskoj, biosfernoj i geneticheskoj bezopasnosti v sisteme nacionalnoj bezopasnosti Rossijskoj Federacii // Lex russica. — 2019. — № 9. — S. 96—108.

6. Zhelnin A. I. Biopolitika i biopoliticheskaya ekonomiya: sushchnost konceptov // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sociologiya. 2019. — Vyp. 3. — S. 320—330.

7. Kiryushkin P. A., Yakovleva E. Yu., Astapkovich M., Solodova M. A. Bioekonomika: opyt Evrosoyuza i vozmozhnosti dlya Rossii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6 : Ekonomika. — 2019. — № 4. — S. 60—77.

8. Mohov A. A. Innovacionnye biotekhnologii i informacionnye tekhnologii — drajvery bioekonomiki i smeny paradigmy prava // Problemy garmonizacii ekonomicheskih otnoshenij i prava v cifrovoj ekonomike. — M. : Yusticinform, 2020. — S. 55—64.

9. Ustojchivyj rost za schet bioekonomiki. Finskaya strategiya bioekonomiki // Ekonomika prirodopolzovaniya. — 2020. — № 1. — S. 4—34.

10. Fuko M. Rozhdenie biopolitiki. — M. : Nauka, 2010. — 448 s.

11. The Bioeconomy to 2030: desining a policy agenda // OECD. URL: www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/ oecd/economics/the-bioeconomy-to-2030_9789264056886-en ; The European Bioeconomy in 2030. Delivering Su stainable Growth by addressing the Grand Societal Challenges // URL: www.becoteps.org.

12. McCormick K., Kautto N. The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview. Sustainability, 2013, vol. 5, pp. 2589—2608.