Regulatory Platforms in the Field of Legal Regulation of the Use of Artificial Intelligence

The paper is devoted to the problem of creating a flexible regulatory system that allows testing and limited use of artificial intelligence, guaranteeing the safety of the population and aimed at stimulating the development of artificial intelligence, robots and robotics objects. It is substantiated that the use of the regulatory platform is an effective mechanism for the development of a regulatory system in this area. The author determines and analyzes the essential components of the structure of the regulatory platform that include the regulation of information exchange, the introduction of mandatory conditions for participation, including the introduction of administrative and legal regimes for regulating economic activity, the regulation of monitoring the activities of the regulatory platform subject, a system for leveling risks for both subjects and participants of the regulatory platform, the formation of a mandatory system of protection against the negative consequences of the use of artificial intelligence, robots and robotics objects. The paper describes the main approaches to establishing civil liability for the use of artificial intelligence, robots and robotics objects that include: civil liability of the developer (creator) for the use of artificial intelligence, robot and robotics objects and the civil liability of the user ( owner, proprietor or person making a profit) for using artificial intelligence, robots and robotics objects.

1. Knutov A. V., Chaplinskij A. V. Licenzirovanie otdel’nyh vidov ekonomicheskoj deyatel’nosti: istoriya razvitiya i sovremennoe sostoyanie // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo upravleniya. — 2014. — № 1. — S. 73–96.

2. Laptev V. A. Ponyatie iskusstvennogo intellekta i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ za ego rabotu // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. — 2019. — № 2. — S. 79–102.

3. Lutovinova N. V. Strahovanie predprinimatel’skih riskov kak vid strahovaniya // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoj praktiki. — 2015. — № 3. — S. 75–79.

4. Miroshnichenko M. V. Cifrovaya ekonomika kak perspektivnyj mekhanizm razvitiya // Ekonomika i ekologicheskij menedzhment. — 2019. — № 2. — S. 121–129.

5. Morhat P. M. Otvetstvennost’ tret’ih lic za sovershenie yunitami iskusstvennogo intellekta prichinyayushchih vred dejstvij // Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry. — 2018. — № 3. — S. 47–49.

6. Moshkin A. S., Polevoj E. V. Obyazatel’noe strahovanie grazhdanskoj otvetstvennosti vladel’ca opasnogo ob"ekta: problemy i perspektivy // Nauchnye i obrazovatel’nye problemy grazhdanskoj zashchity. — 2016. — № 1 (29). — S. 120–123.