Features of Investigative Activities Results Application at the Stage of Execution of a Sentence (Case Study: Justifying the Need to Change Punishments and Measures of a Criminal‑Legal Nature, not related to Isolation from Society, towards Toughening)

The paper is devoted to the problematic issues that arise when using the results of investigative activities (IA) at the stage of execution of the sentence. The authors draw attention to the importance of the procedure for proving the facts of concealment of a convicted person from control by the criminal executive inspectorate in cases of submission of submissions to the court on toughening punishments. The information obtained in the course of the IA has a greater informational value for substantiating decisions on issues to be considered by the courts during the execution of a sentence, and their application would make it possible to better motivate the representations of the relevant institutions in the process of proving the need to change penalties and measures of a criminal legal nature that are not related with isolation from society, towards tightening. The paper focuses on the need for an integrated approach to the development of the norms of the current legislation in order to regulate in detail the procedure for conducting IA in relation to persons evading criminal punishment, and measures of legal influence, as well as using the results obtained to substantiate the submissions submitted by criminal executive inspectorates to the court.

1. Goryainov K. K. Operativno-rozysknoj kontrol’ za osuzhdennymi k nakazaniyam bez lisheniya svobody // Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. — 2018. — T. 26 (1–4). — № 4. — S. 396–400.

2. Goryainov K. K., Ivan’kov I. A. Operativno-razysknoe obespechenie ispolneniya nakazaniya i ego celi // Ugolovno-ispolnitel’naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. — 2016. — № 2. — S. 3–6.

3. Krymov A. A. K voprosu o neobhodimosti ugolovno-processual’nogo regulirovaniya nekotoryh aspektov provedeniya operativno-rezhimnyh meropriyatij v ispravitel’nyh uchrezhdeniyah // Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie. — 2016. — № 1 (33). — S. 7–11.

4. Krymov A. A. Obstoyatel’stva, podlezhashchie dokazyvaniyu v stadii ispolneniya prigovora // Ugolovnoispolnitel’noe pravo. — 2013. — № 2. — S. 23–26.

5. Nikolyuk V. V. «Novoe» i «staroe» v praktike otmeny sudom uslovnogo osuzhdeniya v svete pravovyh pozicij Konstitucionnogo Suda i Verhovnogo Suda // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2017. — № 3. — S. 120–129.

6. Ovchinnikov O. M. Operativno-rozysknoe obespechenie ispolneniya uslovno naznachennogo ugolovnogo nakazaniya // Nauchnoe mnenie. — 2014. — № 7. — S. 177–180.

7. Teoriya operativno-rozysknoj deyatel’nosti : uchebnik / pod red. K. K. Goryainova, V. S. Ovchinskogo, G. K. Sinilova. — M. : Infra-M, 2006. — 832 s.