The Role of Customary International Law in Regulating the Activities of Armed Groups in the Field of Human Rights

Over the past decades, there has been a significant increase in the number of armed groups involved in armed conflicts around the world, as well as in their impact on the rights and freedoms of the population under their control. Facing various situations of systematic violations of human rights by non-state actors, experts in the field of international human rights law began to consider the theoretical justification for the mandatory nature of the provisions on the observance and protection of human rights for armed groups. In this regard, a number of scholars have turned to the theory of customary international law, the acceptability of which is being investigated by the author of this paper. The author examines the provisions underlying this theory and the persuasiveness of the argumentation used by its supporters. Based on an analysis of the nature of customary international law, its structural elements, their interpretation by the UN International Court of Justice in its decisions and the relationship of customary international law with peremptory norms of jus cogens, the author concludes that the theory under consideration is currently unable to explain the existence of obligations of armed groups in the field of human rights.

1. Allain J.Slavery in International Law: Of Human Exploitation and Trafficking. — D., 2012. — 444 p.

2. Bellal A.The War Report: Armed Conflicts in 2018. — Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, 2019. — 157 p.

3. Clapham A.Human Rights Obligations for Non-State-Actors: Where are We Now? // Doing Peace the Rights Way: Essays in International Law and Relations in Honour of Louise Arbour / Ed. by F. Lafontaine, F. Larocque. — Intersentia, 2017. — P. 11–35.

4. Droege C.Transfers of detainees: legal framework, non-refoulement and contemporary challenges // International Review of the Red Cross. — 2008. — Vol. 90. — No 871. — P. 669–701.

5. Heffes E.Generating Respect for International Humanitarian Law: The Establishment of Courts by Organized Non-State Armed Groups in Light of the Principle of Equality of Belligerents // Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law. — 2015. — Vol. 18. — P. 181–201.

6. Henckaerts J.-M. Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law: A Contribution to the Understanding and Respect for the Rule of Law in Armed Conflict // International Review of the Red Cross. — 2005. — Vol. 87. — P. 175–212.

7. Henckaerts J.-M., Doswald-Beck L.Customary International Humanitarian Law. — L., 2005. Vol. I (Rules).

8. Koskenniemi M.From Apology to Utopia. The Structure of International Legal Argument. — L., 2006. — 704 p.9. Murray D.Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Armed Groups. — L., 2016. — 360 p.

9. O’Connell M. E. The Art of Law in the International Community. Hersch Lauterpacht Memorial Lectures. — L., 2019. — 328 p.

10. Orakhelashvili A.Natural Law and Customary Law // Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht — 2008. — No 1. — P. 69–110.

11. Orakhelashvili A.Peremptory Norms in International Law. — L., 2006. — 672 p.

12. Ryngaert C.Human Rights Obligations of Armed Groups // Belgian Review of International Law. — 2008. — Vol. 41. — No 1-2. — P. 355–381.

13. Ryngaert C.Non-State Actors in International Humanitarian Law // Participants in the International Legal System: Multiple Perspectives on Non-State Actors in International Law / Ed. by J. d’Aspremont. — L., 2011. — P. 284–294.

14. Sassòli M.Involving organized armed groups in the development of the law? in International Institute of Humanitarian Law, Non-State Actors and International Humanitarian Law. Organized Armed Groups: A Challenge for the 21st Century. — I., 2010. — P. 213–221.

15. Schachter O.International Law in Theory and Practice. — V., 1982. — 431 p.

16. Sivakumaran S.Binding Armed Opposition Groups // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. — 2006. — Vol. 55. — No 2. — P. 369–394.

17. Wood M.Customary International Law and Human Rights // European University Institute (Academy of European Law). — 2016. — No 3. — P. 1–11.

18.