Personnel Aspect in Ensuring the Judicial Activity Organization: Problems and Prospects
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.131.10.144-152
Abstract
The reform of the judicial system of the Russian Federation has been going on for over 20 years. Every year the country faces new economic realities and is forced to respond to emerging difficulties. The paper focuses on the insufficient level of remuneration of employees of the court apparatus (court officials), analyzes the causes of this problem, and provides a calculation based on open statistical data. The author puts forward proposals for finding additional sources of budget revenue, focuses on the problems of functioning of the institution of state fees and ways to eliminate them. As a way to solve the problem, a draft of amendments to tax legislation has been developed. The proposed initiative can be used as a compensatory argument for additional financing of the Russian judicial system. Raising the minimum and maximum thresholds for state duties is an inevitable reform due to the growing burden on the judicial system and the impact of inflationary processes. The judicial community should draw the attention of the executive branch of government to problems and possible ways of solving them.
About the Author
D. I. ShtefanRussian Federation
Daniil I. Shtefan, Postgraduate Student, Department of Court, Prosecutorial and Investigative Activities
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Kleandrov M. I. O Sovete sudebnoj vlasti Rossijskoj Federacii. — M. : Norma : Infra-M, 2016.
2. Kolokolov N. A. Sudebnaya sluzhba! // Administrator suda. — 2016. — № 1.
3. Momotov V. V. Sudebnaya reforma 2018 goda v Rossijskoj Federacii: koncepciya, celi, soderzhanie // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2018. — № 10. — S. 134–146 ; 2019. — № 12. — S. 68–89.
4. Nevezhin V. A. Zastol’nye rechi Stalina: Dokumenty i materialy. — M. : AIRO-XX; SPb. : Dmitrij Bulanin, 2003.
5. Roshchin D. Yu. Optimizaciya instituta sudebnyh raskhodov v grazhdanskom processe Rossijskoj Federacii // Administrator suda. — 2017. — № 2. — S. 25–28.
6. Savinov K. A. Institut gosudarstvennoj poshliny pri obrashchenii v sud: aktual’nye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya // Rossijskaya yusticiya. — 2020. — № 1. — S. 66–70.
7. Sirotyuk A. Z. Nekotorye aspekty pravovogo polozheniya (statusa) gosudarstvennogo sluzhashchego apparata suda kak predposylki sozdaniya sudebnoj sluzhby v Rossijskoj Federacii // Administrator suda. — 2017. — № 2. — S. 53–56.
8. Shamanskij D. A. Problemy social’no-ekonomicheskih garantij dlya sotrudnikov sudebnoj sistemy. Stabil’nost’ i korrupcionnye riski sudebnoj vlasti // Rossijskij sud’ya. — 2019. — № 1. — S. 42–48.
9. Yusupova A. N. Nekotorye voprosy realizacii instituta sudebnyh raskhodov v arbitrazhnom processe // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. — 2017. — № 2. — S. 18–22.
10. Report of the Joint Working Party on the London County // Civil : Justice Quarterly. — London, 1994. — P. 107–110.
Review
For citations:
Shtefan D.I. Personnel Aspect in Ensuring the Judicial Activity Organization: Problems and Prospects. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2021;16(10):144-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.131.10.144-152