Trash Stream: Social Conditioning of Criminalization

The social network as one of the digital technologies has not only creates a platform for communications, especially relevant during a pandemic, but also provokes the emergence of various types of deviant behavior, primarily due to the fact that many communicate on the Internet under fictitious names; it liberates a person, creates a feeling of impunity, control over the situation, etc. Recently, trash streams have become popular on the Web, but not funny and silly, but associated with violence, insult, humiliation of human dignity, causing a feeling of disgust and contrary to public morality. In December 2020, during such a live broadcast, another victim died, which launched a process in society to discuss the need to introduce criminal liability for such acts. The paper assesses the draft criminal law, as well as initiatives to supplement the list of aggravating circumstances and some corpus delicti with an appropriate qualifying feature, and formulates the author’s draft criminal law on responsibility for organizing, conducting, facilitating and participating in direct air in trash streams.

1. Aguzarov T. K., Gracheva Yu. V., Chuchaev A. I. Ugolovno-pravovye problemy ohrany vlasti (istoriya i sovremennost’). — M., 2018.

2. Dagel’ P. S. Usloviya ustanovleniya ugolovnoj nakazuemosti // Pravovedenie. — 1975. — № 4.

3. Zlobin G. A., Kelina S. G. Nekotorye teoreticheskie voprosy kriminalizacii obshchestvenno opasnyh deyanij // Problemy pravosudiya i ugolovnogo prava. — M., 1978.

4. Kerimov D. A. Zakonodatel’naya tekhnika. — M., 1998.

5. Kogan V. M. Izuchenie effektivnosti ugolovno-pravovyh norm: aspekty i urovni analiza // Problemy pravosudiya i ugolovnogo prava. — M., 1978.

6. Kogan V. M. Social’nyj mekhanizm ugolovno-pravovogo vozdejstviya. — M., 1983.

7. Korobeev A. I. Kriminalizaciya i penalizaciya deyanij kak osnovnoe soderzhanie ugolovno-pravovoj politiki // Voprosy sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya. — Sverdlovsk, 1988.

8. Kudryavcev V. N. Kriminalizaciya: optimal’nye modeli // Ugolovnoe pravo v bor’be s prestupnost’yu. — M., 1981.

9. Kurlyandskij V. I. Ugolovnaya politika: differenciaciya i individualizaciya ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti // Osnovnye napravleniya bor’by s prestupnost’yu. — M., 1975.

10. Lesnievski-Kostareva T. A. Differenciaciya ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti. Teoriya i zakonodatel’naya praktika. — M., 2000.

11. Lopashenko N. A. Ugolovnaya politika. — M., 2009.

12. Plaksina T. A. Social’nye osnovaniya kvalificiruyushchih ubijstvo obstoyatel’stv i ih yuridicheskoj vyrazhenie v priznakah sostava prestupleniya. — Barnaul, 2006.

13. Plohova V. I. Osnovaniya ugolovno-pravovogo zapreta. Kriminalizaciya i dekriminalizaciya. — M., 1982.

14. Fefelov P. A. Kriterii ustanovleniya ugolovnoj nakazuemosti deyanij // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1970. — № 11.

15. Filosofskij enciklopedicheskij slovar’. — M., 1983.

16. Firsov I. V. Nezakonnyj oborot medicinskoj produkcii : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2016.