On Judicial Administration in the Russian Federation: Foreign Experience Case Study
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.136.3.127-136
Abstract
Each country chooses the optimal system for organizing the provision of judicial activities, based on historical and current legal understanding. The paper analyzes examples of different forms of distribution of responsibilities between the judiciary and the executive in terms of judicial administration, reveals the scope of powers of state bodies on the example of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Croatia, Great Britain, the USA, etc. The historical experience of Russia in organizing the provision of judicial activities is analyzed, a key problem in financing the budget of the judiciary is highlighted. The author noted a tendency towards a redistribution of powers towards the judiciary and directly the judicial branch of government. The key advantages of the implemented trend are indicated. The bodies of the judiciary, together with the Judicial Department under the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, are taking the right steps to gradually improve the judicial system, at present we cannot stop there, we must strive to increase the effectiveness of communicating the position of the judiciary when resolving issues of budget allocation and identifying priority projects of the judicial system development program for the next decade.
Keywords
organization of court support,
judicial administration,
Ministry of Justice,
independence of the judiciary,
organizational support system,
bodies of the judiciary,
Judicial Department under the Supreme Court,
foreign
experience in judicial administration,
forms of organizing the provision of judicial activities,
federal target program,
development of the judicial system,
the role of the judiciary in the budget process.
About the Author
D. I. Shtefan
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Daniil I. Shtefan, Postgraduate Student, Department of Court, Prosecutorial and Investigative Activities
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Baturov G. P. Organizaciya sudebnoj deyatel’nosti. — M. : Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1977. — 173 s.
2. Bibilo V. N. Sudebnye sistemy zarubezhnyh gosudarstv : uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. — Minsk, 2012. — 93 s.
3. Golunskij S. A. Osnovy sudoustrojstva Soyuza SSR i soyuznyh respublik: postanovlenie CIK SSSR ot 29.10.1924 (SZ. 1924. № 23. St. 203) // Istoriya zakonodatel’stva SSSR i RSFSR po ugolovnomu processu i organizacii suda i prokuratury 1917–1954 gg. : sbornik dokumentov / sost. doc. L. N. Gusev ; pod red. chl.-kor. Akad. nauk SSSR S. A. Golunskogo. — M., 1955.
4. Lenin V. I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij. — 3-e izd. — T. 19. — L. : Partizdat CK VKP(b), 1935.
5. Nekroshyus V. Reforma sudebnoj vlasti v Litovskoj Respublike: osnovnye rezul’taty i perspektivy // Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo v notarial’noj i sudebnoj sfere. — SPb., 2006. — S. 141–149.
6. Petruhin I. L. Sudebnaya vlast’. — M. : TK Velbi, 2003. — 720 s.
7. Pravovye itogi — 2018 / P. V. Krasheninnikov, Yu. G. Tolstoj [i dr.] // Zakon. — 2019. — № 1. — S. 18–37.
8. Savinov K. A. Institut gosudarstvennoj poshliny pri obrashchenii v sud: aktual’nye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya // Rossijskaya yusticiya. — 2020. — № 1. — S. 66–70.
9. Sudebnye sistemy zarubezhnyh stran : uchebnoe posobie dlya magistratury / A. T. Gol’cov, A. L. Osipov [i dr.]. — M. : Norma, Infra-M, 2019. — 160 s.
10. Temushkin O. P. Organizacionno-pravovye formy proverki zakonnosti i obosnovannosti prigovorov. — M. : Nauka, 1978. — 240 s.
11. Fojnickij I. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. — T. 1. — SPb. : Al’fa, 1996. — 607 s.
12. Yakovlev V. F. Izbrannye trudy. T. 3 : Arbitrazhnye sudy: stanovlenie i razvitie. — M. : Statut, 2013. — 749 s.
Review
For citations:
Shtefan D.I. On Judicial Administration in the Russian Federation: Foreign Experience Case Study. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2022;17(3):127-136. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.136.3.127-136
Views:
522
Email this article 