Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Dualism in the Institution of Marriage Regulation System in the State of Israel

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.137.4.136-147

Abstract

The paper discusses one of the most interesting institutions of Israeli family law, namely, the institution of judicial dissolution of marriage. The specificity of this institution lies in the fact that divorce proceedings are carried out by religious courts that have been operating for more than one century. In the State of Israel, along with the system of religious courts, a special, non-denominational court of general jurisdiction, called the Family Court, has been established and operated. The jurisdiction of this Court includes consideration and resolution of issues related to guardianship of minors and incapacitated individuals, that is, all those cases that arise as a result of the dissolution of marriage. At the same time, the issues of confirming the existence of marital relations and their termination are assigned to the exclusive jurisdiction of religious courts. If the spouses, by their religion, belong to Judaism or Islam, dissolution of a marriage is only possible by a decision of a religious court. The dissolution of a marriage between spouses belonging to Christianity is carried out in the general civil Family Court that operates under a specially developed law with respect to cases that are deemed special for Israel. Family matters, including the dissolution of marriages, in the Druze religious community are dealt with by a special judicial instance, the Druze court that differs from the courts of general jurisdiction. 

About the Author

N. M. Liviev
MGIMO; Natan Liviev Law and Notary Office
Israel

Postgraduate Student, S.N. Lebedev Department of International Private and Civil Law, Faculty of International Law, pr. Vernadskogo, d. 76, Moscow, 119454;

Hadera



References

1. Kanevskij A. A. Mesto galahi (iudejskogo prava) v nacionalnyh sistemah pravovogo regulirovaniya : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2015. — 184 s.

2. Koen M., Dalumi R. Semya, lichnyj status, nasledovanie. — Ierusalim, 2018. — 305 s.

3. Sharshevski B., Korinaldi M. Semejnoe pravo. Novaya, obnovlennaya, kompleksnaya redakciya. — Ierusalim, 2016. — 1296 s.

4. Shifman P. Semejnoe pravo v Izraile. — Evrejskij universitet Ierusalima, 1995. — 444 s.

5. Blecher-Prigat A. A Basic Right to Marry: Israeli Style // Israel Law Review, pub. by Cambridge University Press. — 2014. — Vol. 74. — P. 433–460.

6. Dana N. The Druze in the Middle East: Their Faith, Leadership, Identity and Status // Middle East Studies Association Bulletin. — 2008. — Vol. 31 (2). — P. 237–239.

7. Elon M. Jewish Law. History, Sources, Principles : 4-volume set : Reprint edition. — The Jewish Publication Society, 2003. — 2500 p.

8. Freedman E. Family law in Israel: Overview // International Family Law. — 2018. — January.

9. Freedman E. Religious Divorce in Israel // International Family Law. — 2000. — April. — P. 19–21.

10. Friedman I. British Pan-Arab Policy 1915–1922. — 1st ed. — Routledge, 2010. — 420 p.

11. Frimer D. I. Israel Civil Courts and Rabbinical Courts Under One Roof // Israel Law Review, pub. by Cambridge University Press. — 1990. — Vol. 24. — P. 553–559.

12. Hillel N. A Digest of Selected Judgments of the Supreme Court of Israel. — Cambridge University Press ; The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1990.

13. Levy A. The Jews of the Ottoman Empire. — Princeston, NJ : Darwin Press, 1994. — 784 p.

14. Mendell L. Jewish law. An Introduction. — Northvale, NJ : Publ. by Jason Aronson, 1994. — 298 p.

15. Quint E. Jewish Jurisprudence: Its Sources & Modern Applications. — Routledge, 1986. — 256 p.

16. Ramadan H. M. Understanding Islamic Law: From Classical to Contemporary. — Rowman Altamira, 2006. — 219 p.

17. Schellekens J., Gliksberg D. The Decline in Marriage in Israel, 1960–2007: Period or Cohort Effect? // European Journal of Population. — 2018. — P. 119–142.

18. Scolnicov A. Religious law, religious Courts and human rights within Israeli constitutional structure. — Oxford University Press ; New York University School of Law, 2006.


Review

For citations:


Liviev N.M. Dualism in the Institution of Marriage Regulation System in the State of Israel. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2022;17(4):136-147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.137.4.136-147

Views: 434


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)