Types, Nature and Defects of System Connections of the Legislative Norms on Administrative Offenses

The relevance of the problem under consideration is predetermined by a large number of changes in the legislation on administrative offenses, which has become one of the factors of the appearance of contradictions, negative assessments by the legal community of the state of the current legislation on administrative offenses and the ongoing process of reforming the legislation on administrative offenses. The purpose of the study is to determine the types and nature of systemic relationships between the norms of legislation on administrative offenses. The object of the study is the system of administrative offenses legislation. The subject of the study is the interrelated norms of law, the types, nature and defects of some relationships. The study used a combination of general scientific, special and private scientific methods of cognition of legal phenomena, a special role is given to the systematic approach. In the course of the study, it is noted that violations of the interrelationships of the norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation on administrative offenses (defects) generate uncertainty in the legal regulation of administrative responsibility and contribute to the appearance of errors in the practice of implementing the norms of law. The paper provides the classification of interrelations of norms and examines defects in them (collisions, unjustified competition and duplication of norms, legal gaps). The author proposes possible ways of eliminating some defects. It is concluded that the introduction of amendments (additions) to the administrative and tort legislation, the development and adoption of a new one should be analyzed and the nature of the interrelationship of its normative content should be considered.

1. Avdeyko A. G., Gazizov D. A. Reformirovanie zakonodatelstva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie. — 2019. — № 4. — S. 454–457.

2. Alekseev S. S. Struktura sovetskogo prava. — M.: Yurid. lit., 1975. — 264 s.

3. Vitruk N. V. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti: monografiya / Rossiyskaya akad. pravosudiya. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. — M.: Norma, 2009. — 304 s.

4. Goncharov D. Yu. Mezhotraslevye vzaimosvyazi v zakonodatelstve o protivodeystvii prestupnosti: monografiya. — M.: Yurlitinform, 2014. — 318 s.

5. Zyryanov S. M. Perspektivy razvitiya zakonodatelstva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnaya deyatelnost pravookhranitelnykh organov RF i zarubezhnykh stran: sbornik materialov Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Ryazan, 20 aprelya 2017 g. / pod obshch. red. L. V. Pavlovoy. — Ryazan: Akademiya prava i upravleniya Federalnoy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy, 2017. — S. 24–27.

6. Zyryanov S. M. Problemy konstruirovaniya sostavov administrativnykh pravonarusheniy v statyakh Osobennoy chasti KoAP RF // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2020. — № 8. — S. 105–126.

7. Kisin V. R., Khadisov G. Kh. Kollizii subinstituta administrativnoy otvetstvennosti sobstvennikov transportnykh sredstv // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. — 2020. — № 6. — S. 247–252.

8. Kommentariy k Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii / pod red. prof. V. D. Zorkina — 3-e izd., peresmotr. — M.: Norma: Infra-M, 2013. — 1040 s.

9. Nikulin M. I., Rerikh L. A. Problemy pravovoy reglamentatsii poryadka privlecheniya k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narushenie rezhima povyshennoy gotovnosti v usloviyakh pandemii novoy koronavirusnoy infektsii (COVID-19) // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2020. — № 12. — S. 32–35.

10. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 t. T. 3. — 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. — M.: Mysl, 2010. — 692 s.

11. Popugaev Yu. I. Sushchnost i klassifikatsiya kollizii (konkurentsii) administrativno-deliktnykh norm // Aktualnye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-protsessualnogo prava: sbornik statey po materialam ezhegodnoy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 70-letiyu doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora, zasluzhennogo deyatelya nauki Rossiyskoy Federatsii, zasluzhennogo yurista Rossiyskoy Federatsii Avrutina Yuriya Efremovicha, Sankt-Peterburg, 24 marta 2017 goda: v 3 ch. — SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD RF, 2017. — S. 21–25.

12. Pravoprimenitelnaya deyatelnost v oblasti bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya v 2020 godu: informatsionnoanaliticheskiy obzor. — M.: FKU «NTs BDD MVD Rossii», 2021. — 76 s.

13. Salishcheva N. G. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya instituta administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2014. — № 9. — S. 9–22.

14. Starostin S. A. O kontseptualnykh osnovakh zakonodatelstva ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). — 2014. — № 2. — S. 18–25.

15. Syrykh V. M. Materialisticheskaya teoriya prava: Izbrannoe. — M.: RAP, 2011. — 1259 s.

16. Cherdantsev A. F. Osnovnye problemy teorii tolkovaniya sovetskogo prava: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. Sverdlovsk, 1972. — 35 s.