Methodological Foundation of Civil Law Regulation of Remote Investment Transactions
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.137.4.065-075
Abstract
The author examines the risk of property losses for participants in remote investment transactions as a methodological basis for their civil law regulation. The author describes the risks inherent both to the recipients of investments and private investors when making these transactions in the info. The conclusion is substantiated that external and internal risks are characteristic of both credit institutions and other economic entities. If such a legal entity finds itself in the position of a recipient of investments, these risks in their actual implementation will prevent this entity from fulfilling its obligation to the investor in a timely and full manner. According to the author, all possible negative events eventually crystallize into a single risk that opposes the agreements with the investor that took place within the framework of the transaction — the risk of non-payment of the recipient of the investment. In this regard, the author presumes the property losses of the participants in the transaction and the avalanche-like reaction of conflict tension spreading along the chain of non-payments that can involve hundreds of subjects and destabilize not only the investment transactions, but also the transactions made under civil law as a whole. The methodology of civil law regulation of remote investment transactions should be based on the inevitability of the risk of property losses of participants in these transactions. The author of the paper makes proposals concerning formation and functioning of preventive legal mechanisms that minimize the negative impact of this risk.
About the Author
D. E. MatytsinRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Economics), Senior Researcher, Department of Civil and International Private Law;
Associate Professor, Department of Civil Law and Procedure,
prosp. Universitetskiy, d. 100, Volgograd, 400062
References
1. Agarkov M. M. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu. T. 1. — M., 2002.
2. Alekseev S. S. O sostave grazhdanskogo pravonarusheniya // Pravovedenie. — 1958. — № 1.
3. Bogatova V. P. Ponyatie i sostav ubytkov. Problemy teorii i praktiki // Nauchnyj almanah. — 2019. — № 11-1 (61).
4. Bolshoj tolkovyj slovar russkogo yazyka / pod red. S. A. Kuznecova. — SPb., 2000.
5. Braginskij M. I., Vitryanskij V. V. Dogovornoe pravo : Obshchie polozheniya. — M., 2020.
6. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Obshchaya chast / pod red. E. A. Suhanova. T. 1. — M., 2019.
7. Grazhdanskoe pravo : uchebnik / pod red. E. A. Suhanova. T. 1. — M., 1993.
8. Grazhdanskoe pravo : uchebnik. Ch. 1 / pod red. A. P. Sergeeva, Yu. K. Tolstogo. — M., 2013.
9. Dal V. I. Tolkovyj slovar zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka. — M., 1991.
10. Ioffe O. S. Obshchee uchenie ob obyazatelstvah. — SPb., 2004.
11. Karlash D. S. Elektronnyj dokumentooborot: voprosy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Pravo i ekonomika. — 2019. — № 8.
12. Kislicyna M. G. Otgranichenie ubytkov ot inyh kategorij grazhdanskogo prava // Centralnyj nauchnyj vestnik. Yurisprudenciya. — 2017. Oktyabr. — T. 2. — № 19.
13. Krasavchikov O. A. Yuridicheskie fakty v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave. — M., 1958.
14. Kurennoj A. M., Kostyan I. A. Cifrovaya ekonomika i trudovye otnosheniya (problemy vvedeniya elektronnogo dokumentooborota) // Sovremennye informacionnye tekhnologii i pravo : monografiya / Moskovskij gosuniversitet imeni M. V. Lomonosova, Yuridicheskij fakultet ; otv. red. E. B. Lauts. — M. : Statut, 2019.
15. Novickij I. B., Lunc L. A. Obshchee uchenie ob obyazatelstvah. — M., 1950.
16. Pobedonoscev K. P. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. T. 3. — M., 2003.
17. Rozhkova M. A. Yuridicheskie fakty grazhdanskogo i processualnogo prava: soglasheniya o zashchite prav i processualnye soglasheniya // URL: http://rozhkova.com/books_text/UFISOGLASH.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 26.03.2021).
18. Stukanova E. A. Nekotorye voprosy ponyatiya i yuridicheskoj harakteristiki ubytkov v grazhdanskom prave Rossijskoj Federacii // Aktualnye nauchnye issledovaniya v sovremennom mire. — 2020. — № 7-1 (63).
19. Shershenevich G. F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava. — M., 2019. 20. Rapp W. The Global Mortgage Crisis Litigation Fallout // After the Crisis: Rethinking Finance / T. LagoardeSegot (ed.). — Hauppauge, NY : Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2010. — P. 47–80.
Review
For citations:
Matytsin D.E. Methodological Foundation of Civil Law Regulation of Remote Investment Transactions. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2022;17(4):65-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.137.4.065-075