Legal Regulation of Cloud Gaming
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.141.8.083-092
Abstract
The paper considers the problems of using cloud gaming technology. The author defines cloud gaming and explores three main models according to which remote access to games can be provided: software as a service, a platform as a service, and an infrastructure as a service. The author examines two blocks of issues that arise when using cloud services for games. In particular, taking several cloud gaming services as a case study, the author examines the following issues from the field of intellectual property: communicating to the public and reproducing computer games and contract law regulation of relations between a cloud services’ operator, a player and a rightholder. The paper highlights the legal nature of a relationship between the cloud services’ operator and the player and elements of the corresponding contract. It is concluded that the current legal regulation allows the parties involved to resolve most issues in this area.
About the Author
A. Yu. ChurilovRussian Federation
Aleksey Yu. Churilov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Civil Law
Moskovsky trakt, d. 8, Tomsk, Russia, 634050
References
1. Audit & komplaens: zakon, doktrina, praktika: monografiya / otv. red. I. V. Ershova. — M.: Prospekt, 2022. — 304 s.
2. Glandin S., Ivonina A. Komplaens: vmeste i vroz. Vydelyat li sanktsionnyy komplaens v otdelnoe podrazdelenie? // Vnutrenniy kontrol v kreditnoy organizatsii. — 2021. — № 2. — S. 106–108.
3. Glandin S., Primakov D. Sanktsionnyy komplaens v 2019 g.: tendentsii i novye veyaniya // Legal Insight. — 2019. — № 04 (80). — S. 36–39.
4. Daradonov K. V. Sanktsionnyy komplaens: voprosy dostatochnosti normativnogo obespecheniya // Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo. — 2021. — № 2 (55). — S. 263–268.
5. Dobrynina L. Yu., Gubareva A. V. Pravovoe obosnovanie otvetnykh mer Rossiyskoy Federatsii na ekonomicheskie sanktsii SShA, ES i ikh soyuznikov // Natsionalnaya bezopasnost. — 2020. — № 1. — S. 24–37.
6. Ershova I. V., Enkova E. E. Reforma audita & razvitie komplaensa: obzor nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii // Pravo i biznes. — 2022. — № 2. — S. 57–60.
7. Kvanina V. V. Ponyatie i vidy pravovykh rezhimov predprinimatelskoy deyatelnosti // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2017. — № 424. — S. 234–240.
8. Kosov M. E., Roshchin N. S., Lebedeva N. V. Sanktsionnyy komplaens (spetsialnye politiki i protsedury) // Alleya nauki. — 2019. — T. 2. — № 11 (38). — S. 595–608.
9. Sovremennye problemy razvitiya predprinimatelskogo i korporativnogo prava v Rossii i za rubezhom: monografiya / pod obshch. red. V. A. Vaypana, M. A. Egorovoy. — M.: Yustitsinform, 2021. — 672 s.
10. Tarasenko O. A. Formirovanie doktriny i zakonodatelstva o pravovykh rezhimakh bankovskoy deyatelnosti // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. — 2001. — Vyp. 51. — S. 105–132.
Review
For citations:
Churilov A.Yu. Legal Regulation of Cloud Gaming. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2022;17(8):83-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.141.8.083-092