Criteria and Methods of Punishment Individualization in Administrative Cases

The paper examines the concept and essence of punishment individualization as a principle of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses. This principle is implemented by consolidating in the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses of the ordinary rules for imposing administrative punishment applicable to any administrative offense, and special rules applied to individual administrative offenses and those who committed them. On the basis of a systematic analysis of ordinary and special rules of sentencing, law upholders use such methods of individualization as determining the rules for punishment imposition within the limits of the sanction provided for under the relevant article of the Special Part of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation and under the laws of constituent entities of the Russian Federation on administrative offenses or the possibility of imposing administrative punishment, the type or size of which is not provided for by sanctions of the relevant provisions. The paper explains the system and content of the criteria of individualization taken into account for the imposition of administrative punishment and the practice of their application. The author considers safeguards for implementation of the principle of individualization of punishment.

1. Bazhanov A. A. Sorazmernost kak printsip prava: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2019. — 193 s.

2. Burlakov V. N. Ugolovnoe pravo i lichnost prestupnika. — SPb., 2006. — 240 s.

3. Veselov E. G., Chugaev A. P. Naznachenie nakazaniya: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. — M.: Yurlitinform, 2008. — 328 s.

4. Voronin V. N. Individualizatsiya nakazaniya: ponyatie, kriterii, znachenie: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2015. — 252 s.

5. Galagan I. A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost v SSSR: gosudarstvennoe i materialno-pravovoe issledovanie: monografiya. — Voronezh: Izdatelstvo Voronezhskogo gosuniversiteta, 1970. — 252 s.

6. Galaktionov S. A. Printsip spravedlivosti: ugolovno-pravovoy aspekt: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Ryazan, 2004. — 169 s.

7. Gorodnova O. N. Ideya spravedlivosti kak kriteriy otsenki i sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatelstva: teoreticheskiy i prikladnoy aspekty: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Cheboksary, 2014. — 227 s.

8. Dzhukha O. V. Printsipy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnogo protsessa: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Rostov n/D, 2011. — 199 s.

9. Dugenets A. S. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost v rossiyskom prave: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M.: RPA Minyusta RF, 2005. — 373 s.

10. Zhadanova E. I. Obshchie pravila naznacheniya administrativnykh nakazaniy k yuridicheskim litsam za narushenie zakonodatelstva o zashchite prav potrebiteley // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya «Yurisprudentsiya». — 2014. — № 1. — S. 70–77.

11. Zhidkikh I. V. Realizatsiya printsipov ugolovnogo prava v obshchikh nachalakh naznacheniya nakazaniya: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Rostov n/D, 2007. — 189 s.

12. Karpets I. I. Individualizatsiya nakazaniya v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. — M., 1961. — 152 s.

13. Kelina S. G., Kudryavtsev V. N. Printsipy sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava. — M., 1988. — 176 s.

14. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka: 80 000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy / Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk. Institut russkogo yazyka imeni V.V. Vinogradova. — 4-e izd., dop. — M.: A Temp, 2006. — 944 s.

15. Romanov V. M. Printsipy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti i ikh realizatsiya v deyatelnosti organov vnutrennikh del: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2000. — 24 s.

16. Sabitov T. R. Ugolovno-pravovye printsipy: ponyatie, sistema, vidy: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — Ekaterinburg, 2019. — 421 s.

17. Fefelov P. A. Ponyatie i sistema printsipov sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava. — Sverdlovsk, 1970. — 144 s.

18. Filimonov V. D. Printsipy ugolovnogo prava. — M.: Tsentr YurInfoR, 2002. — 139 s.