The Essence of the Principle of Free Speech in Administrative Proceedings and its Elements
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.148.3.032-039
Abstract
The paper elucidates the concept of publicity as a principle of proceedings in administrative offenses The essence of the principle of publicity is expressed in the requirements to ensure public consideration of an administrative offense and guarantee access to information concerning it. Based on a systematic analysis of the provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, international law, the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation and legal standings of the highest judicial authorities, the paper explains elements of the principle of publicity characterizing its content in administrative proceedings. The paper examines existing exceptions and limitations regarding the requirements of openness in administrative proceedings as well as statutory gaps and contradictions in implementation of the principle of publicity. On the ground of decisions in specific cases, the paper highlights the importance of legislative guarantees of the principle of transparency in administrative proceedings.
Keywords
principles,
system of principles,
concept of principles,
principle of publicity,
procedural principles,
guarantees of implementation of principles,
administrative process,
proceedings in cases of administrative offenses,
administrative responsibility,
administrative offense,
legislation on administrative offenses
About the Author
A. R. Nobel
Volga‑Vyatka Institute (branch), Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Artem R. Nobel, Cand. sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of State Law Disciplines
610000, Kirov, ul. Moskovskaya, d. 30
References
1. Anosova L. S. Sootnoshenie ponyatiy glasnosti, otkrytosti i transparentnosti sudoproizvodstva: konstitutsionno-pravovye aspekty // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2009. — № 21. — S. 25–29.
2. Batishchev O. V. Binarnaya pravovaya priroda obshchego nachala glasnosti ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Obshchestvo. Zakon. Pravosudie. — 2020. — № 2 (47). — S. 20–23.
3. Bezrukov S. S. Printsipy ugolovnogo protsessa: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 2016. — 513 s.
4. Volodina A. N. Glasnost ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: pravovaya priroda, soderzhanie i problemy realizatsii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2009. — 267 s.
5. Grinenko A. V. Sistema printsipov ugolovnogo protsessa i ee realizatsiya na dosudebnykh stadiyakh: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — Voronezh, 2001. — 471 s.
6. Dobrovolskaya T. N. Printsipy sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. — M., 1971. — 199 s.
7. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka: 80 000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy / Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk. Institut russkogo yazyka imeni V.V. Vinogradova. — 4-e izd., dop. — M.: A Temp, 2006. — 944 s.
8. Polieva O. M. Glasnost i informatsionnaya otkrytost v deyatelnosti sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Rostov n/D, 2014. — 28 s.
9. Stakhov A. I. O neobkhodimosti privedeniya v sootvetstvie s Konstitutsiey Rossiyskoy Federatsii vnesudebnogo i sudebnogo poryadkov razresheniya del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie. — 2019. — № 4. — S. 493–497.
10. Strebkova E. G. Printsip transparentnosti sudebnoy vlasti: konstitutsionno-pravovye voprosy: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Saratov, 2012. — 223 s.
11. Foynitskiy I. Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. T. 1 / obshch. red., poslesl., prim. A. V. Smirnova. — SPb.: Alfa, 1996. — 552 s.
12. Yakovlev D. Yu. Predely glasnosti sudoproizvodstva (zapiski kriminologa) // Rossiyskiy sudya. — 2020. — № 7. — S. 54–59.
Review
For citations:
Nobel A.R. The Essence of the Principle of Free Speech in Administrative Proceedings and its Elements. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2023;18(3):32-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.148.3.032-039
Views:
586
Email this article 