Election Commissions in the Mechanism of Protection of Political Competition in the Russian Federation

The paper analyzes the status of election commissions as safeguards of ensuring and protecting political competition in the Russian Federation. Political competition is considered in the context of elections as a mechanism for implementing constitutional principles of alternation of power and ensuring political rights of participants in electoral relations. The paper describes a specific place of election commissions (primarily, the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation — CEC) in the political system, which determines their potential in protecting political competition. The key characteristics of election commissions due to which they can protect political competition involve their remoteness from the political market, lack of interest in the results of competition, and impartiality and independence in making decisions involving public power. The leading role of the CEC of the Russian Federation in protection of political competition is determined taking into account its status as the agency heading the system of election commissions in Russia, as well as taking into account the fixed scope of powers in relation to participants of the electoral process. The author determines some problems limiting the potential of election commissions in protecting political competition. These include, in particular, issues of election commissions formation, problems of ensuring their independence, insufficient powers to regulate electoral relations, etc. It is concluded that it is impossible to increase transparency and competitiveness of the political system without comprehensive institutionalization of election commissions at all levels of public authority. This implies expanding capabilities of election commissions to regulate the political market and implementation of guarantees of their independence. At the same time, it is noted that protection of political competition, despite a significant role of election commissions in political competition, cannot be reduced exclusively to their activities, since it also requires an adequate level of judicial protection of political rights and strengthening public control over electoral procedures.

1. Alisova L. N., Goncharov L. A. Institut mezhpartiynoy konkurentsii v strukture sovremennogo parlamentarizma // Nauka. Kultura. Obshchestvo. — 2019. — 1. — S. 59–66.

2. Aminova G. G. Partii-spoylery kak ugroza razvitiyu politicheskoy konkurentsii // Problemnyy analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie. Nauchnye soobshcheniya. — 2015. — № 2. — S. 127–132

3. Aseev S. Yu., Shashkova Ya. Yu. Novye rossiyskie partii v politicheskom protsesse: problemy effektivnosti uchastiya // Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2015. — Tom 1, № 2 (86). — S. 207–214.

4. Afontsev S. A. Politicheskie rynki i ekonomicheskaya politika. — Izd. 2-e. — M.: Leland, 2015. — 384 s.

5. Belous Yu. S. Predvybornaya agitatsiya i informatsionnoe obespechenie vyborov vo vzaimosvyazi stadiy izbiratelnogo protsessa // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. — 2007. — № 4. — S. 36–40.

6. Viskulova V. V. Pravotvorchestvo izbiratelnykh komissiy kak garantiya izbiratelnykh prav grazhdan // Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2012. — № 12. — S. 37–41.

7. Vishnevskiy B. L. Politicheskaya konkurentsiya v Rossii: khronika snizheniya // Politicheskaya ekspertiza: Politeks. — 2007. — T. 3, № 2. — S. 287–295.

8. Volodina S. V. Institutsionalnye faktory vliyaniya na politicheskuyu konkurentsiyu: osnovnye podkhody k izucheniyu i sovremennaya rossiyskaya praktika // Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. — 2014. — № 4 (101). — S. 27–36.

9. Volchik V. V. Mezhdistsiplinarnost v ekonomicheskoy nauke: mezhdu imperializmom i plyuralizmom // Terra Economicus. — 2015. — № 13 (4). — S. 52–64.

10. Ergonova E. G. Elektoralnyy marketing politicheskikh partiy // Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. — 2010. — № 6. — S. 212–216.

11. Zorin V. A. Konkurentnost munitsipalnykh vyborov v Chelyabinskoy oblasti v 2005–2007 gg. // Trudy kafedry noveyshey istorii Rossii Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta / pod red. S. A. Bakanova, G. A. Goncharova. T. 2. — Chelyabinsk: Rekpol, 2008. — S. 69–78.

12. Isobchuk M. V. Fragmentatsiya regionalizma kak faktor ego dinamiki // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya «Politologiya». — 2020. — № 14 (3). — S. 35–45.

13. Kurochkin A. V. Prichiny ogranichennoy elektoralnoy konkurentsii rossiyskikh politicheskikh partiy // Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Politologiya. Religiovedenie». — 2019. — T. 29. — S. 19–27.

14. Lukyanova E. A. Konkurentsiya v politike = konkurentsiya v biznese? // Sovremennaya konkurentsiya. — 2007. — № 3. — S. 61–69.

15. Lyubarev A. E. Korrelyatsionnyy analiz itogov golosovaniya na Rossiyskikh Federalnykh i regionalnykh vyborakh 2011–2018 gg. // Politicheskaya nauka. — 2021. — № 1. — S. 205–225.

16. Maslennikova S. V. Politicheskaya konkurentsiya kak prioritetnaya sfera konstitutsionnoy regulyatsii // Razvitie Rossii i konstitutsionnoe stroitelstvo: teoriya, metodologiya, proektirovanie: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii. — M., 2011. — S. 260–266.

17. Nezhdanov D. V., Rusakova O. F. «Politicheskiy rynok» kak sistemoobrazuyushchaya metafora sovremennogo politologicheskogo diskursa // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. — 2011. — № 4. — S. 158–170.

18. Obukhov D. V. Politicheskaya konkurentsiya i politicheskiy rynok v prostranstve sotsialnoy realnosti // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. — 2011. — № 4. — S. 38–40.

19. Osipova E. A. Marketingovaya ekspansiya v prostranstvo politicheskogo // Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya». — 2015. — № 11 (154). — S. 9–17.

20. Pravovye pozitsii izbiratelnykh komissiy Rossii / pod red. S. V. Kabysheva. — M.: Formula prava, 2016. — 376 s.

21. Troitskaya T. V. Problemy obespecheniya nezavisimosti v rabote izbiratelnykh komissiy Rossii // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. — 2014. — № 1 (96). — S. 111–115.

22. Turovskiy R. F. Prezidentskie vybory v Rossii: vozmozhnosti i predely elektoralnoy konsolidatsii // Zhurnal politicheskoy filosofii i sotsiologii politiki «Politiya. Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz». — 2018. — № 2 (89). — S. 23–50.

23. Shalashova O. N. Institutsionalnyy analiz rossiyskoy izbiratelnoy sistemy // Upravlencheskoe konsultirovanie. — 2020. — № 3. — S. 99–109.

24. Shilov V. N., Rylkina A. P. Politicheskaya konkurentsiya: termin, ponyatie, forma deyatelnosti // Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya «Istoriya. Politologiya. Ekonomika. Informatika». — 2011. — № 13 (108). — S. 176– 184.

25. Fedorkin N. S. Upravlenie riskami v izbiratelnoy kampanii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12, Politicheskie nauki. — 2016. — № 3. — S. 23–37.

26. Ananyev M., Poyker M. Do dictators signal strength with electoral fraud? // European Journal of Political Economy. — 2022. — Vol. 71 (C). — 15 p. — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102075.

27. Bader M. The Role of Precinct Commissions in Electoral Manipulation in Russia: Does Party Affiliation Matter? // Russian Politics. — 2017. — Vol. 2. — Iss. 4. — P. 434–453. — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/24518921-00204003.

28. Forrat N. Shock-Resistant Authoritarianism: Schoolteachers and Infrastructural State Capacity in Putin’s Russia // Comparative Politics. — 2018. — Vol. 50, № 3. — P. 417–449. — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5129/001041518822704908.

29. Rochlitz M., Mitrokhina E., Nizovkina I. Bureaucratic discrimination in electoral authoritarian regimes: Experimental evidence from Russia // European Journal of Political Economy. — 2021. — № 66, Article 101957. — 20 p. — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101957.

30. Ross C. Regional elections in Russia: instruments of authoritarian legitimacy or instability? // Palgrave Communications. — 2018. — № 4 (75). — 9 p. — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0137-1.

31. State Duma Elections 19 September 2021, Russian Federation. ODIHR Needs Assessment Mission Report, 31 May — 4 June 2021 // The OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). — 14 p. — URL: https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/0/f/491066_0.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.06.2022).