International Family Law: Quo Vadis?

The paper discusses the evolution of private international law analyzing the rules governing crossborder family relations in order to identify the factors influencing the development of international family law at the present stage, and the trends that accompany it. The author concludes that private international law from an apolitical field of legal knowledge about ways to overcome the conflict is turning into a tool of legal policy that can provide an impact on cross-border relations. In the European Union countries, whose international private law has changed beyond recognition over several decades, this influence is especially noticeable. Attention is drawn to the consistent approach of European institutions, which has already significantly expanded the normative structure of international family law. Although international family law in the Russian Federation is subject to change, it is not so dynamic. Nevertheless, the author believes that a change in the status quo is inevitable and cannot but take into account objective factors that lie outside its limits. The transformation of interstate communities requires clarification of the list of the participants, the powers of their institutions to develop the norms of international family law, the territory of such norms; determining the legal outline of the state family policy — an adequate reflection of traditional family values in the rules of conflict law; development of information technologies — improvement of mechanisms for resolving cross-border family disputes.

1. Anichkin E. S. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo nachala XXI veka: universalnye vektory razvitiya // Izvestiya AltGU. — 2015. — № 2‑1 (86). — S. 19–23.

2. Voytovich E. P. Avtonomiya voli v regulirovanii imushchestvennykh otnosheniy suprugov, oslozhnennykh inostrannym elementom, v Rossiyskoy Federatsii// Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2019. — № 2. (266). — S. 72–81.

3. Voytovich E. P. Razreshenie transgranichnykh semeynykh sporov v praktike rossiyskikh sudov // Pravo i pravoprimenenie v sovremennoy Rossii: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. — Novosibirsk, 2020. — S. 175–176.

4. Voytovich E. P. Semeynye soglasheniya v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave // Lex russica. — 2022. — T. 75. — № 5 (186). — S. 45–52.

5. Popondopulo V. F. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: priroda i tendentsii razvitiya // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. — 2018. — № 2 (119). — S. 91–99.

6. Ternovaya O. A. Reglamenty Evropeyskogo Soyuza ob imushchestve supruzheskikh par i razvitie sudebnogo sotrudnichestva po grazhdanskim delam // Sudya. — 2019. — № 11 (107). — S. 48–53.

7. Trigubovich N. V. Roditelskaya opeka i otvetstvennost: konventsionnoe tolkovanie Gaagskoy konferentsii po mezhdunarodnomu chastnomu pravu i rossiyskoe zakonodatelstvo // Zakon. — 2018. — № 6. — S. 69–78.

8. Shakhnazarov B. A. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava i ego mesto v sisteme prava // Lex russica. — 2021. — T. 74. — № 7. — S. 44–60.

9. Boele-Woelki K. What comparative family law should entail // Utrecht Law Review. — 2008. — Vol. 4. — № 2. — P. 1–24.

10. Eeckhout V. Communitarization of Private International Law: Tendencies to «liberalise» International Family Law. — 2004. — P. 52–70.

11. Eeckhout V. Private International Law Questions that Arise in the Relation between Migration Law (in the Broad Sense of the Word) and Family Law: Subjection of PIL to Policies of Migration Law? — 2013.

12. Meeusen J. Instrumentalisation of Private International Law in the European Union: Towards a European Conflicts Revolution? // European Journal of Migration and Law. — 2007. — № 9. — P. 287–305.

13. Muir Watt H. Fundamental rights and recognition in private international law // Journal européen des droits de l’homme. — 2013. — № 3. — P. 411–434.

14. Schmitz A. J., Wing L. Veneficial and ethical odr for family issues // Family court review. — 2021. — Vol. 59. — № 2. — P. 250–267.