Control and Supervision Comprehensive Reform: Domestic Experience through Constitutional Law Dimension

. In the paper, the author applies constitutional law positions in order to study key aspects of a number of stages of the comprehensive reform of state control (supervision), municipal control and public control in their systemic unity in the Russian Federation. The author makes the following conclusions and proposals: 1) the next stage of the reform of control and supervisory activities has now begun and its main direction may become the reduction in the number of unnecessary inspections and the expansion of preventive measures, which can be reflected in the Concept of the reform of control and supervisory activities being prepared in 2022–2024; 2) the development and further implementation of information technologies, electronic platforms and services that are convenient for operational communication of all parties involved in the process of control and supervision activities should become an important mechanism, which will contribute to solving the fundamental task of putting the rights and legitimate interests of citizens and organizations in the spotlight, the needs and expectations of people in accordance with the constitutional imperative about the person as the highest value; 3) given the priority of developing effective communication mechanisms within a single system of public authority, regulatory authorities’ assistance to local governments is very important, which can be expressed in educational and methodological assistance, advising on topical issues of control and supervisory activities, etc.; 4) the conceptual result of a comprehensive reform of the sphere under consideration should be the formation of a new constitutional and legal philosophy of the future control and supervision activities in the context of improving state and municipal government and the actively developing concept «the state for citizens».

1. Agamagomedova S. A. Administrativnye barery dlya biznesa: minimizatsiya v usloviyakh reformy gosudarstvennogo kontrolya i nadzora // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2021. — № 2. — S. 6–9.

2. Aktualnye problemy garmonizatsii sudebnoy reformy s reformoy gosudarstvennogo kontrolya i nadzora: sbornik nauchnykh statey / R. Yu. Batrshin, N. I. Burmakina, N. D. But [i dr.]; otv. za vypusk A. I. Stakhov. — M.: RGUP, 2018. — 164 s.

3. Genprokuror Rossii zayavil ob osvobozhdenii predprinimateley ot 60 % vneplanovykh proverok // TASS. — 07.09.2022. — URL: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/15672891 (data obrashcheniya: 10.09.2022).

4. Grib V. V. Razvitie regionalnogo zakonodatelstva v sfere obshchestvennogo kontrolya // Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2015. — № 11. — S. 3–6.

5. Grishkovets A. A. Nuzhen li Rossii spetsialnyy federalnyy zakon o kontrolno-nadzornoy deyatelnosti? // Administrativnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2016. — № 7 (103). — S. 585–592.

6. Dmitriy Grigorenko: Tsel nadzora — pomoch biznesu, a ne nakazat // Sayt Pravitelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. — 17.06.2022. — URL: http://government.ru/news/45755/. (data obrashcheniya: 10.09.2022).

7. Evdokimov A. S. Federalnyy zakon «O gosudarstvennom kontrole (nadzore) i munitsipalnom kontrole v Rossiyskoy Federatsii»: organizatsionno-pravovoy analiz // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2022. — № 2. — S. 34–40.

8. Kvanina V. V. Reforma kontrolno-nadzornoy deyatelnosti i voprosy pravovogo regulirovaniya antimonopolnogo kontrolya za soblyudeniem khozyaystvuyushchimi subektami antimonopolnogo zakonodatelstva // Konkurentnoe pravo. — 2020. — № 2. — S. 37–41.

9. Krasnov zayavil, chto Genprokuratura i Minekonomiki mogut otmenit chast proverok dlya biznesa navsegda // Kommersant. — 07.09.2022. — URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5548197 (data obrashcheniya: 10.09.2022).

10. Mochievskiy S. V., Akinina N. Yu., Anisimov V. F., Grib V. V. Problemy osushchestvleniya kontrolno-nadzornoy deyatelnosti v usloviyakh pandemii COVID-19 i vozmozhnye puti resheniya (na primere federalnogo gosudarstvennogo pozharnogo nadzora v Khanty-Mansiyskom avtonomnom okruge — Yugre) // Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2021. — № 12. — S. 3–7.

11. Nozdrachev A. F. Kontrol: pravovye novelly i nereshennye problemy // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2012. — № 6. — S. 18–28.

12. Nozdrachev A. F., Zyryanov S. M., Kalmykova A. V. Reforma gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) i munitsipalnogo kontrolya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2017. — № 9. — S. 34–46.

13. Saidov Z. A. K voprosu ob uporyadochenii kontrolno-nadzornoy deyatelnosti v sfere ekonomiki // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2017. — № 1. — S. 65–67.

14. Soboleva Yu. V. K voprosu o ponyatii administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya v usloviyakh reformy kontrolya i nadzora // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2020. — № 11. — S. 49–51.

15. Spiridonov A. A. Novaya filosofiya upravleniya: opyt Tulskoy oblasti // Vestnik Tulskogo filiala Finuniversiteta. — 2014. — № 1. — S. 160–163.

16. Spiridonov A. A. Sistemnoe edinstvo gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) i obshchestvennogo kontrolya kak konstitutsionno-pravovoy printsip // Lex russica. — 2022. — T. 75. — № 6 (187). — S. 48–58.

17. Stenogramma vystupleniya Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii V. V. Putina na plenarnom zasedanii XXV Peterburgskogo mezhdunarodnogo ekonomicheskogo foruma // Sayt Prezidenta RF. — URL: http:// kremlin.ru/events/president/news/68669 (data obrashcheniya: 10.09.2022).

18. Tereshchenko L. K. Protsedury i garantii, obespechivayushchie uchastie fizicheskikh i yuridicheskikh lits v ikh otnosheniyakh s organami publichnoy administratsii // Administrativnye protsedury i kontrol v svete evropeyskogo opyta / pod red. T. Ya. Khabrievoy, Zh. Marku. — M.: Statut, 2011. — S. 243–266.

19. Tikhomirova L. A. Reforma kontrolno-nadzornoy deyatelnosti («regulyatornaya gilotina») v sfere promyshlennoy bezopasnosti // SPS «KonsultantPlyus». — 2021.

20. Shugrina E. S. Gosudarstvennyy kontrol (nadzor) za mestnym samoupravleniem: novye-starye osobennosti vzaimootnosheniy // Munitsipalnoe imushchestvo: ekonomika, pravo, upravlenie. — 2019. — № 4. — S. 3–9.