Significance of the Constitutional Category of Personal Dignity in Bioethics and Medicine
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.143.10.046-053
Abstract
The article raises the question of the dignity of the individual in the field of bioethics and medicine. The author notes that today the number of situations in medicine and law is increasing when it is necessary to make a difficult ethical choice, while relying on the priority of the value of human life. This scientific work focuses on the fact that, despite a number of contradictions, bioethics, law and medicine have common values — human life and dignity. The paper analyzes the works of domestic and foreign authors devoted to bioethics and its correlation with the rules of law. In particular, the terminological aspect is considered. Having conducted a comprehensive study of dogmatic sources, the author offers her own version of the definition of the dignity of the individual as a category in the field of somatic and bioethical rights. Since the relationship between bioethics, medicine and law is quite young for the Russian Federation, there are a number of gaps in our legal system. The author of the article talks about the prospects for the gradual development of legal regulation of relations related to bioethics and medicine, which will lead to the minimization of such gaps.
About the Author
I. Yu. KrylatovaRussian Federation
Irina Yu. Krylatova, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Constitutional Law; Director of the Center for Bioethics and Law, Leading Researcher, Research Laboratory of Legal Support for the Safe Use of Genetic and Genomic Information,
ul. Komsomolskaya, d. 21, Yekaterinburg, Russia, 620137
References
1. Avtonomov A. S. Sistemnost kategoriy konstitutsionnogo prava: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 1999. — 361 s.
2. Bondar N. S. Bukva i dukh rossiyskoy Konstitutsii: 20-letniy opyt garmonizatsii v svete konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2013. — № 11. — S. 5–17.
3. Bondar N. S. Konstitutsionnaya kategoriya dostoinstva lichnosti v tsennostnom izmerenii: teoriya i sudebnaya praktika // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2017. — № 4. — S. 19–31.
4. Dobrynin N. M. Konstitutsionnye popravki 2020 goda: k voprosu o deystvitelnom avtoritete i nezavisimosti sudebnoy vlasti kak klyuchevykh garantiyakh etiko-pravovogo obespecheniya dostoinstva lichnosti v Rossii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2021. — № 5. — S. 21–29.
5. Ivin A. A., Nikiforov A. L. Slovar po logike — M.: Vlados, 1997. — 384 s.
6. Kondakov N. I. Logicheskiy slovar. — M., 1971. — 721 s.
7. Kozlova E. I. Izbrannye trudy: sbornik statey, lektsiy, tezisov. — M., 2017. — 304 s.
8. Kozlova E. I., Kutafin O. E. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik. — 5-e izd. — M.: Prospekt, 2016. — 592 s.
9. Komarova V. V. Voprosy konstitutsionnogo razvitiya (v kontekste pozitsiy O. E. Kutafina) // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2016. — № 12. — S. 3–6.
10. Kommentariy k Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy). — 2-e izd., peresm. / pod red. V. D. Zorkina. — M.: Norma, Infra-M, 2011. — 1008 s.
11. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik / otv. red. A. N. Kokotov, M. I. Kukushkin. — M.: Norma: Infra-M, 2010. — 544 s.
12. Konstitutsionnyy i otraslevoy status lichnosti: teoriya i praktika transformatsii: uchebnoe posobie / pod obshch. red. V. A. Lebedeva. — M.: Prospekt, 2020. — 126 s.
13. Kravets I. A. Dignitatis Humanae, sovremennyy konstitutsionalizm i pravovaya ekzistentsiya: filosofskoantropologicheskie, konstitutsionnye, mezhdunarodno-pravovye i sotsialno-politicheskie aspekty (ch. 1) // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. — 2020. — № 5 — S. 38–52.
14. Kravets I. Konstitutsionnaya bioyurisprudentsiya i dostizhenie bioeticheskogo blagopoluchiya (ch. 1) // Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. — 2022. — № 2 (147). — S. 16–42.
15. Kravets I. A. «Chelovek dostoynyy» («Homo Dignus») v sovremennom konstitutsionalizme i v pravovom regulirovanii statusa lichnosti (otechestvennyy, sravnitelnyy i mezhdunarodnyy aspekty) // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2020. — № 459. — S. 242–255.
16. Kravets I. A. Dostoinstvo lichnosti: dialog teorii, konstitutsionnykh norm, mezhdunarodnykh regulyatorov i sotsialnoy realnosti // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2019. — № 1. — S. 112–128.
17. Kutafin O. E. Izbrannye trudy: v 7 t. T. 7: Rossiyskiy konstitutsionalizm: monografiya. — M.: Prospekt, 2011. — 541 s.
18. Lipchanskaya M. N. Konstitutsionnaya kategoriya «upravlenie delami gosudarstva»: problema opredeleniya i soderzhaniya // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo». — 2010. — T. 10. — Vyp. 2. — S. 66–71.
19. Narutto S. V. Realizatsiya konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina: uchebnoe posobie. — M.: Norma: Infra-M, 2022. — 360 s.
20. Nevinskiy V. V. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii i dostoinstvo cheloveka (vospominanie o budushchem) // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2013. — № 11. — S. 48–54.
21. Umnova I. A., Stalnova A. S. Konstitutsionnyy printsip uvazheniya dostoinstva cheloveka: obshchie podkhody v pravoponimanii i rossiyskaya konstitutsionnaya praktika // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2016. — № 10. — S. 15–20.
22. Yudin B. G. Chelovek: vykhod za predely. — M.: Progress-traditsiya, 2018. — 472 s.
23. Potter Van Rensselaer. Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. — Englewood Cliffs-N.J., 1971. — 196 p.
Review
For citations:
Krylatova I.Yu. Significance of the Constitutional Category of Personal Dignity in Bioethics and Medicine. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2022;17(10):46-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.143.10.046-053