Constitutional Law Provision of Physical Inviolability of a Person in the Conditions of Genetic Diagnostics Application in the Russian Federation

In the article, the author analyzes the difficulties of normative regulation of the issue of protection of the human body in terms of the impact on its genetic characteristics in the implementation of genetic diagnostics technology. In this regard, in order to characterize the object of influence within the framework of this manipulation, the paper considers the features of the justification of the category «human genome» in the scientific literature, the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights — a document adopted to regulate relations related to impacts on human genetic information. Attention is focused on the problems of legislative regulation of these relations in Russia. The conclusion is formulated about the need to perceive the human genome as an element of its physical autonomy. The problems of non-interference in the integrity of the human body in the conditions of the implementation of the technology of genetic diagnostics are investigated. The author makes proposals aimed at creating conditions that exclude illegal encroachments on the genetic characteristics of the human body during the application of the above-mentioned technology. Thus, a number of restrictions are proposed, in the conditions of which the use of genetic diagnostic technology is not allowed.

1. Alimov E. V., Leshchenkov F. A. Pravovye osnovy provedeniya genomnykh issledovaniy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i stranakh anglosaksonskoy pravovoy semi // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2019. — № 11. — S. 43–57.

2. Vasilev S. A., Osavelyuk A. M., Shirokov A. Yu. K voprosu o zakonodatelnom opredelenii predelov osushchestvleniya genomnoy meditsiny // Problemy prava. — 2022. — № 1 (84). — S. 57–63.

3. Gromova A. A. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na okhranu zdorovya i meditsinskuyu pomoshch v usloviyakh primeneniya biomeditsinskikh tekhnologiy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ponyatie i soderzhanie // Problemy prava. — 2022. — № 2 (85). — S. 84–88.

4. Drgonets Ya., Khollender P. Sovremennaya meditsina i pravo: per. so slovats. — M.: Yurid. lit., 1991. — 336 s.

5. Ksenofontova D. S. Pravovye osnovy gennoy terapii: v poiskakh balansa interesov // Lex russica. — 2019. — № 6. — S. 143–152.

6. Lebedev V. A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy ogranicheniy prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina // Lex russica. — 2017. — № 1 (22). — S. 130–138.

7. Maleina M. N. Rol pravovykh printsipov v ustranenii i minimizatsii riskov primeneniya genomnykh tekhnologiy // Lex russica. — 2019. — № 8. — S. 121–128.

8. Montgomeri Dzh. Modifikatsiya genoma cheloveka: vyzovy so storony sfery prav cheloveka, obuslovlennye nauchno-tekhnicheskimi dostizheniyami // Pretsedenty Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. — 2018. — № 3. — S. 42–56.

9. Nechkin A. V., Voronina L. I. Pravovoe regulirovanie skrininga na nasledstvennye zabolevaniya: otechestvennyy i zarubezhnyy opyt // Sovremennoe pravo. — 2019. — № 7–8. — S. 99–105.

10. Rassolov I. M., Chubukova S. G., Baygarin R. T., Stukalov A. S. Teoreticheskie problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya ispolzovaniya geneticheskoy informatsii v Rossii i Evrosoyuze // Zakon i pravo. — 2019. — № 9. — S. 24–29.

11. Romanovskaya O. V., Ryzhova A. A. Konstitutsionnaya pravosubektnost grazhdan v usloviyakh razvitiya biomeditsinskikh tekhnologiy: monografiya. — M.: Prospekt, 2019. — 144 s.

12. Romanovskiy G. B. Pravovoe regulirovanie geneticheskikh issledovaniy v Rossii i Germanii // Pravozashchitnik. — 2016. — № 2.

13. Trikoz E. N. Zashchita prav cheloveka v kontekste razvitiya bioetiki i genomiki (obzor mezhdunarodnogo kruglogo stola) // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki». — 2019. — T. 23. — № 1. — S. 141–154.

14. Yantseva L. I. Bolshoy slovar meditsinskikh terminov. — M.: Tsentrpoligraf, 2007. — 959 s.

15. Curren L., Kaye J., Boddington P., Melham K. et al. Identifiability, Genomics and UK Data Protection Law // European Journal of Health Law. — 2010. — Vol. 17. — Iss. 4. — P. 329–344.