Freedom of Conscience in Civil Society: Legal and Moral Dimensions

Freedom of conscience, by virtue of its nature, exists simultaneously in a legal and moral dimensions. The analysis of the doctrine, legislation and law enforcement practice suggests the existence of legal (formal) and moral (substantive) problems associated with it. The formal problem of freedom of conscience is associated with identification of this freedom with a much narrower freedom of religion. The analysis of approaches existing in Russian legal science regarding the concept of freedom of conscience allows us to group them in two main approaches, namely, the restrictive approach and the expanding approach. In legislation and the law enforcement practice, the restrictive approach to freedom of conscience prevails. It entails a violation of the rights and freedoms of citizens in this area. The separation of legal definitions of freedom of conscience and freedom of religion can help to solve the problem at the legislative level. In relation to the category of freedom of conscience, there is also a substantial problem based on the fact that the low level of legal culture of Russian citizens, complicating the formation of civil society, affects the perception of freedom of conscience and the permissibility of its necessary restrictions. In other words, citizens, exercising this freedom, often interpret it broadly. The solution of this problem requires an increase in the level of legal and general culture of citizens, the formation of moral principles necessary for every member of civil society, including the activities of religious associations and educational organizations.

1. Antonov M. V. Normativnost i faktichnost v zashchite religioznykh svobod // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. — 2018. — № 3. — S. 24–49.

2. Baburin S. N. Pravovye i dukhovno-nravstvennye osnovy tsifrovogo budushchego chelovechestva v epokhu narastayushchey ekologicheskoy katastrofy // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta imeni S.Yu. Vitte. Seriya 2, Yuridicheskie nauki. — 2019. — № 4 (22). — S. 6–12. — DOI: 10.21777/2587-9472-2019-4-6-12.

3. Bredikhin A. L. Svoboda sovesti i veroispovedaniya kak printsipy demokraticheskogo gosudarstva // Vestnik Instituta prava Bashkirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2020. — № 4 (8). — S. 34–39.

4. Bulavina M. A. Svoboda sovesti i svoboda veroispovedaniya: konstitutsionno-pravovoy aspekt // Vestnik Instituta mirovykh tsivilizatsiy. — 2019. — T. 10. — № 3 (24). — S. 104–108.

5. Vorobev S. S. Yuridicheskie aspekty svobody sovesti kak prava vybora subektov pravootnosheniy // Srednerusskiy vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk. — 2015. — T. 10. — № 6. — S. 185–189.

6. Vystuplenie Svyateyshego Patriarkha Aleksiya na ocherednoy sessii PASE // URL: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/301775.html (data obrashcheniya: 27.09.2022).

7. Dimitrov N. N., Semenov A. V. Pravovaya okhrana svobody sovesti i svobody veroispovedaniya v Rossii v sisteme gosudarstvenno-konfessionalnykh otnosheniy // Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo imeni V.B. Bobkova filiala Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. — 2017. — № 1 (61). — S. 68–72.

8. Drobot S. E. Konstitutsionalizatsiya mirovozzrencheskoy svobody v kontekste svetskogo gosudarstva i svobody sovesti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika. — 2020. — T. 16. — № 3. — S. 28–39.

9. Kondzharyan A. A. Sootnoshenie ponyatiy: svoboda sovesti i svoboda veroispovedaniya i granitsy zakonodatelnogo regulirovaniya // Nauchno-prakticheskie issledovaniya. — 2019. — № 8‑7 (23). — S. 31–33.

10. Lebedinets I. N. Svoboda sovesti — absolyutnoe pravo kazhdogo individa (kak svoboda sovesti podmenyaetsya svobodoy manipulyatsii soznaniem) // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2017. — № 10 (83). — S. 168–174.

11. Lisovskaya T. V. Ogranichenie svobody sovesti: podkhody i printsipy // Sektovedenie. — 2018. — № 7. — S. 43–51.

12. Nikitina A. E. Konstitutsionno-pravovye garantii prava na svobodu sovesti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ponyatie, soderzhanie, sushchnost // Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. — 2021. — № 1 (42). — S. 139–143.

13. Osipov R. A. Pravovaya kultura i ee rol v pravovom gosudarstve // Uchenye zapiski Tambovskogo otdeleniya RoSMU. — 2021. — № 21. — S. 114–120.

14. Osnovy ucheniya Russkoy pravoslavnoy tserkvi o dostoinstve, svobode i pravakh cheloveka // Tserkovnyy vestnik. — 2008. — Iyul.

15. Rybak S. V. Svoboda sovesti kak pravo cheloveka na samoopredelenie po otnosheniyu k religii // Filosofiya prava. — 2015. — № 6 (73). — S. 53–58.

16. Skorokhodov S. S. Svoboda sovesti i svoboda veroispovedaniya: doktrinalnye i formalnye grani // Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatelstvo; pravo i upravlenie. — 2019. — № 7 (110). — S. 61–63.

17. Fominskaya M. D. Ideya dostoinstva lichnosti i prav cheloveka v khristianskoy pravovoy mysli: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — Rostov n/D, 2021. — 480 s.

18. Yatsenko O. V. Konstitutsionnaya konstruktsiya printsipa svobody sovesti v yuridicheskoy praktike // Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta upravleniya i ekonomiki. — 2021. — № 1 (33). — S. 108–111.