Machine-Readable Law, a Statute and a Human-Readable (Russian) Language

The paper defines the role played by the human-readable, namely Russian, language in the technologies of machine reading of law and statutes. The author analyzes the complexity factor of interpretation according to the rules of formal logic of conceptual units and terminology of law and statutes, which may be an obstacle to the processes of machine-reading of law, as well as the formation of machine-readable law. The author draws a number of conclusions regarding the methodology of machine-reading technologies and machine-drafting technologies, in particular that these processes should be formed and implemented in a single legal-ideological, legal-aesthetic, ethical, stylistic, methodological, technological, etc. paradigm and in the context of processes common to law and statutes: «the formation of law — lawmaking — implementation of law.» If, in the presence of all critical assessments of the «quantum theory of consciousness», we assume that there are features of quantum laws in the human psyche, then it should be stated that human thinking, world perception, and therefore legal perception are not limited to formal logical, computational frameworks, but include some «non-computational,» irrational mechanisms. Anyway, it seems obvious that the activity of human consciousness goes beyond purely algorithmic actions. Trying to «fit» the mechanisms of human perception of law and statutes into some logically consistent schemes means a priori incorrect reflection of law and statutes in such «schemes.» Among other things, the author comes to the conclusion that machine-reading processes should be carried out on the basis of the widest possible semiotic paradigm and based on the super-task of constructing a holographic, «quantum-like» model of law. At the same time, the Russian language, as the language of the synthetic system, is quite acceptable for use in machine-reading technologies and, perhaps, even more preferable than the analytical languages.

1. Agatstsi E. Vliyanie Gedelya na filosofiyu matematiki // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. — 2010. — T. 25. — № 3. — S. 16–41.

2. Begishev I. R., Khisamova Z. I. Iskusstvennyy intellekt i robototekhnika: glossariy ponyatiy. — M.: Prospekt, 2021. — 64 s.

3. Bingi V. N. Fizicheskie effekty soznaniya: zakon vosproizvodimosti. — M.: Infra‑M, 2021. — 560 s.

4. Bukalov A. V. Myshlenie i kvantovaya fizika: teoremy Gedelya, Tarskogo i printsip neopredelennosti // Fizika soznaniya i zhizni, kosmologiya i astrofizika. — 2001. — № 2. — S. 5–8.

5. Bukalov A. V. Psikhika, zhiznennye protsessy i kvantovaya mekhanika — fenomenologicheskiy podkhod // Fizika soznaniya i zhizni, kosmologiya i astrofizika. — 2001. — № 1. — S. 22–32.

6. Vashkevich A. M. Avtomatizatsiya prava: pravo kak elektrichestvo. — M.: Simploer, 2019. — 256 s.

7. Gavrilov S. N. Mashinochtenie prava i «prostranstvennye postroeniya v zhivopisi»: poisk metodologii mashinnogo pravovospriyatiya // Lex russica. — 2022. — T. 75. — № 9. — S. 66–78.

8. Dubrovskiy D. I. Epistemologiya i kognitivnye nauki // Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki. — 2017. — T. 22. — № 1. — S. 125–136.

9. Zakharov V. D. R. Penrouz o soznanii: apofaticheskiy podkhod? // Metafizika. — 2013. — № 3 (9). — S. 199– 207.

10. Zotov A. F., Melvil Yu. K. Zapadnaya filosofiya XX veka: uchebnoe posobie. — M.: Prospekt, 1998. — 432 s.

11. Ivanskiy V. P. Informatsionno-kognitivnoe (kvantovoe) pravoponimanie: ponyatie i kriterii // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. — 2014. — № 4 (315). — S. 44–60.

12. Ivanskiy V. P. O novoy pravovoy paradigme: informatsionno-kvantovaya (kognitivnaya) teoriya prava // Sovremennoe pravo. — 2014. — № 2. — S. 4–11.

13. Karamyshev I. S. Smert matematika? // Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 7, Filosofiya. — 2019. — № 1. — S. 95–108.

14. Karsavin L. P. O lichnosti // URL: https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=176812&p=40 (data obrashcheniya: 28.09.2022).

15. Klishina I. V., Kazaryan V. P. Idei Brauera v kontekste filosofii // Rossiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal. — 2018. — T. 7. — № 2. — S. 85–96.

16. Kolesov V. V. Osnovy kontseptologii. — SPb.: Zlatoust, 2019. — 776 s.

17. Kolesov V. V. Russkaya mentalnost v yazyke i tekste. — SPb., 2006. — 624 s.

18. Losev A. F., Takho-Godi A. A. Platon. Aristotel. — M., 2005. — 395 s.

19. Losskiy N. O. Mir kak osushchestvlenie krasoty. Osnovy estetiki // URL: https://thelib.ru/books/nikolay_losskiy/mir_kak_osuschestvlenie_krasoty_osnovy_estetiki-read.html (data obrashcheniya: 28.09.2022).

20. Losskiy N. O. Usloviya absolyutnogo dobra; Osnovy etiki; Kharakter russkogo naroda. — M.: Politizdat, 1991. — 368 s.

21. Lotman Yu. M. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov // Razvitie lichnosti. — 2017. — № 1. — S. 17. — S. 13–59.

22. Manin Yu. I. Teorema Gedelya // Priroda. — 1975. — № 12. — S. 80–87.

23. Nikolaeva T. V. Ikona-skladen 1412 g. mastera Lukiana // Sovetskaya arkheologiya. — 1968. — № 1. — S. 89–102.

24. Penrouz R. Novyy um korolya. O kompyuterakh, myshlenii i zakonakh fiziki / R. Penrouz. — M.: URSS, 2003.

25. Pimenova M. V. Kontseptualizatsiya chuvstva v russkoy yazykovoy kartine mira // Mir cheloveka i mir yazyka. — Kemerovo: Grafika, 2003. — S. 58–120.

26. Podnieks K. M. Vokrug teoremy Gedelya. — Riga: Zinatne, 1992. — 191 s.

27. Ponkin I. V. Kontsept mashinochitaemogo i mashinoispolnyaemogo prava: aktualnost, naznachenie, mesto v PerTexe, soderzhanie, ontologiya i perspektivy // International journal of open information technologies. — 2020. — T. 8. — № 10. — S. 59–69.

28. Pukhova T. B. Esteticheskie osnovaniya prava: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Vladimir, 2008. — 27 s.

29. Puchkov V. O. Ponyatiyno-terminologicheskiy apparat pravovedeniya i perspektiva «mashinizatsii» prava: vozmozhno li predstavlenie pravovykh konstruktsiy sredstvami λ-ischisleniya? // Yuridicheskiy vestnik DGU. — 2021. — T. 40. — № 4. — S. 36–42.

30. Radbil T. B. Osnovy izucheniya yazykovogo mentaliteta: ucheb. posobie. — M.: Flinta: Nauka, 2013. — 328 s.

31. Raushenbakh B. V. Prostranstvennye postroeniya v zhivopisi: ocherk osnovnykh metodov. — M.: Nauka, 1980. — 289 s.

32. Smeyl S. Matematicheskie problemy sleduyushchego stoletiya // Simo K., Smeyl S., Shensine A. [i dr.] Sovremennye problemy khaosa i nelineynosti. — Izhevsk: Institut kompyuternykh issledovaniy, 2002. — S. 280–303.

33. Terkulov V. I. Antropotsentricheskaya paradigma: Chto bylo? Chto budet? // Kognitsiya, kommunikatsiya, diskurs. — 2012. — № 5. — S. 83. — S. 74–84. — URL: http://sites.google.com/site/cognitiondiscourse/ (data obrashcheniya 20.11.2022).

34. Cheyf U. Na puti k lingvistike, osnovannoy na myshlenii // Yazyk i mysl: Sovremennaya kognitivnaya lingvistika / sost. A. A. Kibrik, A. D. Koshelev. — M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury, 2015. — S. 60–88.

35. Chestnov I. L. Postklassicheskaya teoriya prava: monografiya. — SPb.: Alef-Press, 2012. — URL: https://litresp.ru/chitat/ru/%D0%A7/chestnov-iljya-ljvovich/postklassicheskaya-teoriya-prava-monografiya/4 (data obrashcheniya: 08.11.2022).

36. Epshteyn M. N. Myslit po-russki: vzglyad iz-za rubezha // Nezavisimaya gazeta. Ex Libris. — 2008. 24 apr. — URL: https://www.ng.ru/ng_exlibris/2008-04-24/4_filosophy.html (data obrashcheniya 13.11.2022).

37. Yazykovye osnovy russkoy mentalnosti: ucheb. posobie / V. V. Kolesov, M. V. Pimenova. — 5‑e izd., ster. — M., 2017. — 248 s.