Protection of the Family as a Subject of Joint Jurisdiction of the Russian Federation and the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation

The paper is devoted to the analysis of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation passe in 2020 concerning protection of the family, motherhood, fatherhood and childhood as a subject of joint jurisdiction of the Russian Federation and constituent entities of the Russian Federation. It is proved that this legal norm does not relate to the declarative norms of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. It defines only the joint jurisdiction issue between the Russian Federation and constituent entities of the Russian Federation that is subject to differentiation between federal and regional state authorities. The purpose of the adopted amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation was to raise to the constitutional level protection of traditional family values — family, motherhood, fatherhood, childhood, parental care. Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation regarding protection of the family have an impact on other branches of law concerning family relations and traditional values. The paper analyzes the latest versions of constitutions and charters of constituent entities of the Russian Federation regarding the protection of the family. It is concluded that by amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the State sought to build a comprehensive system of family protection in the Russian Federation and make it a priority in state policy engaging all levels of public authority in this process. Our country has not concentrated family policy issues at the federal level, centralizing the entire social sphere here, but has transferred it to the joint jurisdiction of the federal center and the regions.

1. Azarova E. G. Deti kak prioritet gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya sotsialnogo obespecheniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2021. — № 5. — S. 106–119.

2. Eskina L. B. Popravki k Konstitutsii RF: obnovlenie soderzhaniya ili vozvrat k sovetskoy modeli // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2022. — № 2. — S. 11–15.

3. Kondrashev A. A. Tendentsii konstitutsionnogo razvitiya Rossii v kontekste konstitutsionnoy reformy 2020 goda // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2021. — № 11. — S. 15–25.

4. Krasheninnikov P. V., Badulina E. V. Podderzhka instituta semi: konstitutsionnye popravki // Semeynoe i zhilishchnoe pravo. — 2020. — № 4. — S. 19–24.

5. Lebedev V. A. Organy gosudarstvennoy vlasti subektov RF kak element edinoy sistemy publichnoy vlasti sovremennoy Rossii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2021. — № 8. — S. 40–43.

6. Maslennikova S. V., Matveeva M. V. Traditsionnye semeynye tsennosti: konstitutsionno-pravovaya interpretatsiya // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2020. — № 12. — S. 23–29.

7. Matulov B. N. Mestnoe samoupravlenie kak znachimyy uroven osushchestvleniya sotsialnoy kompetentsii publichnoy vlasti // Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2022. — № 2. — S. 20–25.

8. Narutto S. V. Semya kak konstitutsionnaya tsennost // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2017. — № 5. — S. 21–30.

9. Rudman D. S., Slyshalov I. V., Tsvilii-Buklanova A. A. Ukreplenie instituta semi kak osnova bezopasnosti sovremennogo rossiyskogo obshchestva // Semeynoe i zhilishchnoe pravo. — 2021. — № 3. — S. 22–25.

10. Sadovnikova G. D. Konstitutsionalizatsiya sotsialno-ekonomicheskoy sfery i sotsialnoe blagopoluchie cheloveka // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2022. — № 7. — S. 30–33.

11. Smyshlyaeva O. V. Pravo na sozdanie semi i «traditsionnaya» model rossiyskoy semi: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Permskiy yuridicheskiy almanakh. — 2018. — № 1. — S. 301–306.

12. Turkovich K. Prodvizhenie i obespechenie raznoobraziya form semeynoy zhizni // Byulleten Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. — 2021. — № 2. — S. 8–13.

13. Khabrieva T. Ya., Chirkin V. E. Teoriya sovremennoy konstitutsii. — M.: Norma, 2005. — 319 s.

14. Shishenina I. V., Konev F. F. Mezhdunarodnye mekhanizma zashchity prava cheloveka na semyu // Notarius. — 2019. — № 4. — S. 46–48.