Prospects for the Development of Open Public Administration and Public Control: Constitutional and Legal View

In the study, the author proceeds from the fact that open state and municipal administration as a concept and practice with huge potential is systematically associated with the development of effective mechanisms of public control. A number of conclusions and proposals are suggested for discussion, including the following:
1) implementation of the formats of open state and municipal governance in combination with the evolution of control and supervisory activities, public control gives a synergetic effect and significantly increases the confidence of society, citizens, business in the system of public authorities and their activities;
2) an extremely important role in achieving positive effects and practical results is played by the comprehensive digitalization of control and supervisory activities, state and municipal management in general, which is why this trend needs to be continued, making the relevant technologies and services even more understandable, accessible and convenient;
3) the new philosophy of state and municipal management currently being formed and improved should include effective open administration and organization of control and supervisory activities based on building a full-fledged partner and service model of such activities; this new philosophy should fully embody the evolving ideas of clientcentricity and the key principles of the concept of the «State for the People.»
A number of specific proposals have been formulated, including normative ones, aimed at further development of digitalization of public control, including a proposal to study the issue of creating and developing a single portal of public control in the Russian Federation.

1. Goncharov I. V. Sovremennye podkhody k realizatsii prav cheloveka v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii obshchestvennykh otnosheniy // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). — 2019. — № 9.

2. Grib V. V. Obshchestvennye obedineniya i inye negosudarstvennye nekommercheskie organizatsii kak uchastniki obshchestvennogo kontrolya: rossiyskiy i zarubezhnyy opyt // Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii i za rubezhom. — 2015. — № 4.

3. Grib V. V. Pravovye voprosy institutsionalizatsii vzaimodeystviya grazhdanskogo obshchestva i organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2011. — № 3.

4. Grib V. V. Pravovye problemy institualizatsii grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. — 2010. — № 7.

5. Dzidzoev R. M. K voprosu ob otkrytom pravitelstve v Rossii // Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2013. — № 7.

6. Dzidzoev R. M., Tamaev A. M. Obshchestvennoe (publichnoe) obsuzhdenie proektov zakonodatelnykh i inykh normativnykh pravovykh aktov v formate otkrytogo pravitelstva // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2015. — № 8.

7. Didikin A. B. «Otkrytoe pravitelstvo» v mekhanizme vzaimodeystviya grazhdanskogo obshchestva i gosudarstva: formirovanie pravovoy modeli i ee protivorechiya // Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii i za rubezhom. — 2013. — № 1.

8. Evsikov K. S., Spiridonov A. A. Povyshenie urovnya zashchity konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod cheloveka v svete reformy gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) i munitsipalnogo kontrolya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. — 2018. — № 3‑2.

9. Zubarev S. M., Sladkova A. V. O ponyatii i sushchnosti tsifrovykh tekhnologiy kontrolya v sfere gosudarstvennogo upravleniya // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2019. — № 9.

10. Kiryanov A. Yu. Problemy realizatsii obshchestvennogo kontrolya v usloviyakh tsifrovoy ekonomiki // Pravo i tsifrovaya ekonomika. — 2021. — № 4 (14).

11. Lisina N. S. Perspektivy sozdaniya edinoy tsifrovoy platformy obshchestvennogo kontrolya: normativnopravovoy aspekt // Molodoy uchenyy. — 2022. — № 43 (438).

12. Lisina N. S. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya i obshchestvennyy kontrol: perspektivy vliyaniya // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2022. — T. 17. — № 6.

13. Likhtin A. A. Transformatsiya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii // Upravlencheskoe konsultirovanie. — 2021. — № 4.

14. Martynov A. V. Sistema «Otkrytoe pravitelstvo» kak odin iz glavnykh mekhanizmov otkrytogo gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v Rossii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2014. — № 1.

15. Nesterov A. V. Obsuzhdaem standart (kontseptsiyu) otkrytosti «otkrytogo pravitelstva» // Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2015. — № 8.

16. Spiridonov A. A. Sistemnoe edinstvo gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) i obshchestvennogo kontrolya kak konstitutsionno-pravovoy printsip // Lex russica. — 2022. — T. 75. — № 6.

17. Stepashin S. V. Obshchestvennyy kontrol: novaya forma gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva: tezisy vystupleniya na konferentsii 20 sentyabrya 2012 g. // Gosudarstvennyy audit. Pravo. Ekonomika. — 2012. — № 4.

18. Stepashin S. V., Dvurechenskikh V. A., Chegrinets E. A., Chernavin Yu. A. Vlast — demokratiya — kontrol. — M., 2005.

19. Titova E. V. Obshchestvennoe uchastie kak konstitutsionnoe pravomernoe povedenie // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2021. — № 7.