Territorial Public Self-Government in Municipal Entities of the Constituent Entities of the Siberian Federal District
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.154.9.021-037
Abstract
Today, the issues of involving citizens in decision-making process of public authorities have become the main vector determining development of democratic countries of the world. Most of all, this trend is felt at the level of the power closest to the population — at the level of local self-government that often uses the institute of territorial public self-government (TPSG) in Russia. The paper defines the state of the legal institution under consideration in Russia using the Siberian Federal District as the case study. Based on the results of the analysis of legislation, the collected material on TPSG (concerning the number, forms of TPSG work, forms of interaction between TPSG and public authorities, etc.), identified TPSG‘s organizational and operational problems, the author concludes that in the state conditions have been created that promote TPSG formation. Consistent resolution of the tasks will allow us to move to a new level of engaging the population in participation in local government.
About the Author
M. A. ChekrygaRussian Federation
Marina A. Chekryga, Consultant, Legal Department,
Krasnyi prosp., d. 18, Novosibirsk, 630007
References
1. Batchaev Sh. Kh. Territorialnoe obshchestvennoe samoupravlenie kak mekhanizm razvitiya territorii v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Aktualnye voprosy sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya: sbornik statey III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: v 2 ch. — Penza, 2020. — S. 209–211.
2. Brattseva E. A. Territorialnoe obshchestvennoe samoupravlenie — samostoyatelnyy i avtonomnyy obshchestvennyy institut // Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2019. — № 5. — S. 40–44.
3. Vasilev S. A. Vzaimootnoshenie organov vlasti s territorialnymi obshchestvennymi samoupravleniyami v gorode Sevastopole po voprosam ustanovleniya ikh granits // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2019. — № 5. — S. 44–50.
4. Glinkin E. G. Aktualnost territorialnogo obshchestvennogo samoupravleniya v sovremennoy Rossii i ego osnovnye problemy // Akademicheskaya publitsistika. — 2020. — № 10. — S. 210–215.
5. Goncharov V. V. Voprosy sootnosheniya obshchestvennogo kontrolya vlasti i narodovlastiya (konstitutsionnopravovoy analiz) // Yurist. — 2019. — № 9. — S. 45–52.
6. Davydov A. A. Munitsipalno-pravovaya priroda, ponyatie i osobennosti territorialnogo obshchestvennogo samoupravleniya // Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2021. — № 8. — S. 23–27.
7. Keshchyan N. A. Tekhnologii dlya razvitiya deyatelnosti territorialnogo obshchestvennogo samoupravleniya // Sochi journal of economy. — 2020. — № 2 (14). — S. 182–188. 8. Kozodubov A. A. Realizatsiya form neposredstvennoy demokratii pri osushchestvlenii mestnogo samoupravleniya // Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2019. — № 6. — S. 27–31.
8. Kokotova M. A. Pravovoe regulirovanie sostava, struktury i poryadka raboty TOS (RF), sovetov kvartalov i sovetov grazhdan (Frantsiya): sravnitelnyy analiz // Rossiyskoe pravo: obrazovanie, praktika, nauka. — 2022. — № 1. — S. 81–87.
9. Larkina A. P. Potentsial munitsipalnoy demokratii v obespechenii sotsialnogo blagopoluchiya grazhdan // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2019. — № 6. — S. 57–60.
10. Lomova N. G., Milodanova O. I. O nekotorykh problemakh razvitiya territorialnogo obshchestvennogo samoupravleniya v Altayskom krae // Altayskiy vestnik gosudarstvennoy i munitsipalnoy sluzhby. — 2020. — № 18 (18). — S. 4–7.
11. Mikheeva T. N. Territorialnoe obshchestvennoe samoupravlenie kak subekt obshchestvennogo kontrolya na munitsipalnom urovne // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2019. — № 6. — S. 61–65.
12. Novokreshchenov A. V. Razvitie gorodskoy territorii i territorialnoe obshchestvennoe samoupravlenie // Vlast i upravlenie na vostoke Rossii. — 2020. — № 3 (92). — S. 153–160.
13. Okutina N. N., Amosova O. S. K voprosu o razvitii territorialnogo obshchestvennogo samoupravleniya // Simbirskiy nauchnyy vestnik. — 2022. — T. 45. — № 1. — S. 91–95.
14. Privalov N. G., Privalova S. G. Territorialnoe obshchestvennoe samoupravlenie v zhilishchno-kommunalnom khozyaystve: istoriya, printsipy, opyt raboty // Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. — 2020. — № 2 (79). — S. 239–251.
15. Sbornik informatsionno-metodicheskikh materialov «Formy uchastiya grazhdan v osushchestvlenii mestnogo samoupravleniya: starosty selskikh naselennykh punktov, territorialnoe obshchestvennoe samoupravlenie, obshchestvennyy kontrol v munitsipalnykh obrazovaniyakh» / avt.-sost. M. A. Chekryga. — Novosibirsk: Arsenal, 2020. — 108 s.
16. Kryukova T. A., Sologub K. V. Territorialnoe obshchestvennoe samoupravlenie (TOS) kak forma razvitiya obshchestvennoy aktivnosti zhiteley goroda Irkutska // Tsivilizatsionnye sdvigi v razvitii sovremennogo goroda: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. — Irkutsk, 2021. — S. 252–295.
17. Territorialnoe obshchestvennoe samoupravlenie v Novosibirskoy oblasti: pravovye osnovy organizatsii i deyatelnosti, opyt raboty / avt.-razrab. S. N. Martynov, L. I. Oberderfer, M. A. Chekryga. — Novosibirsk, 2018. — 112 s.
18. Timofeev N. S. Sobornost i obshchinnost v razvitii mestnogo samoupravleniya // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2019. — № 8. — S. 59–65.
19. Shaykhullin M. S. Kollizionnye voprosy pravovogo regulirovaniya territorialnogo obshchestvennogo samoupravleniya // Matritsa nauchnogo poznaniya. — 2021. — № 3 1. — S. 184–186.
20. Sharonov S. A., Korovin N. A. Grazhdansko-pravovye aspekty pravootnosheniy, skladyvayushchikhsya po povodu deyatelnosti territorialnogo obshchestvennogo samoupravleniya // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. — 2020. — № 5 1 (10). — S. 104–113.
21. Shugrina E. S., Ivanova K. A. O sostoyanii territorialnogo obshchestvennogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (k 30-letiyu pervykh rossiyskikh TOS). Spetsdoklad. — M.: Prospekt, 2018. — 160 s.
22. Bensus V. Improving local governance with citizen engagement? // URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13604813.2021.1885913?scroll=top&needAccess=true&, URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2021.1885913 (data obrashcheniya: 20.02.2023).
23. Cervia S., Citizen Engagement and the Challenge of Democratizing Health: An Italian Case Study Critical Review of Social Sciences, 117, 2018 // URL: http://journals.openedition.org/rccs/8309 (data obrashcheniya: 20.02.2023).
24. Zanbar L. Sense of Belonging and Commitment as Mediators of the Effect of Community Features on Active Involvement in the Community // URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cico.12420?journalCode=ctya (data obrashcheniya: 20.02.2023).
Review
For citations:
Chekryga M.A. Territorial Public Self-Government in Municipal Entities of the Constituent Entities of the Siberian Federal District. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2023;18(9):21-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.154.9.021-037