The Essence of Administrative Prejudicial Effect as a Legal Phenomenon

One of the modern trends in the development of criminal legislation in Russia is manifested in an increase in the number of norms with administrative prejudicial effect. Such norms are enshrined in most chapters of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which emphasizes their importance for the legislator. In these conditions, there is no doubt that for the correct application of these norms it is necessary, first, to correctly interpret the essence of administrative prejudicial effect, to understand its main purpose and characteristics. Today in criminal law there is no legal interpretation of this term, which leads to the emergence of ever new approaches to the definition of administrative prejudice in criminal law. However, they do not fully reveal its essence, but only touch on its individual features. A particularly fundamental point that emphasizes the importance of identifying the legal nature of administrative prejudicial effect is that in science there are ongoing debates regarding the admissibility of such norms in criminal law in principle. In the absence of unity in the terminology used, the legislator also proposes different ways to consolidate administrative prejudicial effect in criminal law. The logical result of such an ambiguous approach to the formulation of crimes with administrative prejudicial effect is the difficulty in interpreting the elements of such crimes. At the same time, it is obvious that these criminal law norms, due to the unity of their legal purpose, must be established uniformly. Uniformity should be manifested both in the use of uniform terminology and in the application of the same approach to the construction of such crimes. In this regard, it is relevant to search for an integrated approach to establishing the essence of administrative prejudicial effect as a special criminal legal phenomenon.

1. Ananeva A. A. «Yuridicheskaya konstruktsiya»: k voprosu ob opredelenii ponyatiya // Izvestiya Baykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2016. — T. 26. — № 1. — S. 141–148.

2. Bezverkhov A. G. Administrativnaya preyuditsialnost v ugolovnom zakonodatelstve Rossii: istorii, realii, perspektivy // Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. Seriya «Pravo». — 2011. — № 2 (10). — S. 39–52.

3. Bogdanov A. V. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya v ugolovnom prave Rossii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2019. — 251 s.

4. Dobrov A. N., Baranova S. A. Institut administrativnoy preyuditsii: ponyatie, sushchnost, tekhnika // Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossii. — 2020. — № 2. — S. 202–208.

5. Gruntov I. O. Ugolovno-pravovye normy s administrativnoy preyuditsiey: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Minsk, 1985. — 22 s.

6. Ivanchin A. V. Kontseptualnye osnovy konstruirovaniya sostava prestupleniya: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — Ekaterinburg, 2015. — 50 s.

7. Kolosova V. I. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya kak sredstvo preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy i sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatelstva // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta imeni N.I. Lobachevskogo. — 2011. — № 5 (1). — S. 246–254.

8. Kruglikov L. L., Spiridonova O. E. Yuridicheskie konstruktsii i simvoly v ugolovnom prave: monografiya. — SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr-Press, 2005. — 344 s.

9. Kuznetsova N. F. Kodifikatsiya norm o khozyaystvennykh prestupleniyakh // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. — Seriya 11, Pravo. — 1993. — № 4. — S. 12–21.

10. Lopashenko N. A. Administrativnoy preyuditsii v ugolovnom prave — net! // Vestnik Akademii Generalnoy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii. — 2011. — № 3 (23). — S. 64–71.

11. Markuntsov S. A. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya kak osoboe sredstvo yuridicheskoy tekhniki i ee ispolzovanie v Ugolovnom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. — 2016. — № 4. — S. 31–42.

12. Miroshnichenko D. V., Kolesnik K. R. Ponyatie administrativnoy preyuditsii v ugolovnom prave Rossii // Uchenye trudy Rossiyskoy akademii advokatury i notariata. — 2018. — № 1. — S. 58–62.

13. Mustafaev Ch. F. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya v ugolovnom prave: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Baku, 1986. — 203 s.

14. Nekrasov A. P. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya kak preyuditsialnaya svyaz mezhdu pravonarusheniem i prestupleniem // Globus. — 2022. — T. 8. — № 2 (67). — S. 63–66.

15. Novikova Yu. S. Pravovoe sostoyanie kak kategoriya prava: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Ekaterinburg, 2005. — 28 s.

16. Odoev O. S. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya v ugolovnom prave Rossii i stran SNG: monografiya. — M.: Yurisprudentsiya, 2018. — 190 s.

17. Parfenov A. V. Ponyatie i sotsialno-yuridicheskaya priroda pravovogo sostoyaniya // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitelnaya praktika. — 2007. — № 2 (3). — S. 4–7.

18. Podolyan A. P. Prestupleniya s administrativnoy preyuditsiey // Epomen. — 2019. — № 34. — S. 231–235.

19. Prozumentov L. M. Osnovanie kriminalizatsii (dekriminalizatsii) deyaniy // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo. — 2014. — № 4 (14). — S. 81–91.

20. Pshenichnov I. M. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya: neobosnovannyy risk dlya ugolovnogo zakonodatelstva // Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. — 2019. — № 13. — S. 592–594.

21. Sapun V. A. Yuridicheskaya konstruktsiya kak pravovoe sredstvo yuridicheskoy tekhniki // Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. — 2013. — № 7 2. — S. 676–679.

22. Tarasova Yu. E. Formy mnozhestvennosti prestupleniy i konstruktsii mnozhestvennogo soversheniya deyaniy v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2019. — 31 s.

23. Tretyakovich E. V. Semanticheskaya neopredelennost v rossiyskom prave // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. — 2018. — № 5 2. — S. 285–290.

24. Khlestakova L. A., Redkov N. A. Institut administrativnoy preyuditsii v ugolovnom prave: ponyatie i funktsii // Suverennoe gosudarstvo i ego pravo: aktualnye problemy yuridicheskoy nauki i pravoprimenitelnoy praktiki v sovremennoy Rossii (k 370-letiyu so vremeni prinyatiya Sobornogo ulozheniya 1649 goda): sbornik trudov XVI Vserossiyskikh dekabrskikh yuridicheskikh chteniy v Kostrome, Kostroma, 12–13 dekabrya 2019 g.: v 2 t. / sost. N. V. Ganzha [i dr.] ; otv. red. G. G. Bril, V. V. Gruzdev. — Kostroma: Kostromskoy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2020. — S. 58–64.

25. Ergasheva Z. E. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya v ugolovnom prave: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2018. — 215 s.